dichotomization

简明释义

英[/daɪˌkɒtəmaɪˈzeɪʃən/]美[/daɪˌkɒtəmaɪˈzeɪʃən/]

n. 二分

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Other problems included dichotomization of the gold standard scale and inappropriate analysis of the equivalence of two diagnostic tests.

其它问题包括金标准的划分和对两个诊断试验等价的不适当的分析。

2.Other problems included dichotomization of the gold standard scale and inappropriate analysis of the equivalence of two diagnostic tests.

其它问题包括金标准的划分和对两个诊断试验等价的不适当的分析。

3.The dichotomization of the population into 'rural' and 'urban' can overlook important nuances.

将人口进行二分法划分为“农村”和“城市”可能会忽视重要的细微差别。

4.In environmental studies, dichotomization can create false binaries between conservation and development.

在环境研究中，二分法可能会在保护与发展之间制造虚假的二元对立。

5.The study highlighted the dangers of dichotomization in social research, as it oversimplifies complex issues.

这项研究强调了在社会研究中二分法的危险，因为它简化了复杂的问题。

6.In psychology, dichotomization can lead to misinterpretations of behavior by categorizing traits too rigidly.

在心理学中，二分法可能会导致对行为的误解，因为将特征过于严格地分类。

7.Critics argue that the dichotomization of gender into male and female is overly simplistic.

批评者认为，将性别进行二分法划分为男性和女性过于简单化。

作文

In the realm of social sciences, the concept of dichotomization is frequently employed to simplify complex phenomena into two distinct categories. This process can be beneficial in various contexts, especially when researchers seek to analyze data or draw conclusions from multifaceted issues. However, it is crucial to recognize that dichotomization (二分法) can also lead to oversimplifications, which may obscure the nuances of the subject matter at hand.For instance, consider the classification of individuals based on their political beliefs. Researchers often categorize people as either 'liberal' or 'conservative.' While this dichotomization (二分法) allows for easier analysis and communication of findings, it fails to capture the spectrum of beliefs that exist between these two extremes. Many individuals hold views that may align with both sides, or they might identify with neither category. By relying solely on a binary classification, researchers risk losing sight of the complexity of human thought and behavior.Moreover, dichotomization (二分法) can have significant implications in fields such as psychology and health. For example, mental health diagnoses are often categorized into 'mental illness' and 'no mental illness.' This binary approach may overlook the gray areas where individuals experience varying degrees of distress or dysfunction. Such simplification can result in inadequate treatment options and stigmatization of those who fall into the 'mental illness' category, disregarding the spectrum of mental health experiences.Another area where dichotomization (二分法) plays a critical role is in education. Students are frequently divided into groups based on their academic performance, often labeled as 'gifted' or 'struggling.' While this categorization aims to tailor educational approaches to meet diverse needs, it can inadvertently create a fixed mindset among students. Those labeled as 'struggling' may internalize this identity, leading to decreased motivation and self-esteem. Conversely, 'gifted' students may feel pressure to constantly perform at high levels, potentially resulting in anxiety and burnout. Here, dichotomization (二分法) not only simplifies the educational landscape but also perpetuates stereotypes and limits the potential for personal growth.In conclusion, while dichotomization (二分法) serves as a useful tool for organizing information and facilitating analysis, it is essential to approach this method with caution. Researchers and practitioners must remain aware of the limitations inherent in binary classifications. Embracing a more nuanced understanding of complex phenomena can lead to richer insights and more effective solutions. It is vital to acknowledge that reality often exists on a continuum rather than within rigid categories. Therefore, while dichotomization (二分法) may simplify our understanding, we must strive to appreciate the complexities that lie beyond the binary framework.

在社会科学领域，dichotomization（二分法）这一概念常被用来将复杂现象简化为两个不同的类别。这一过程在多种情况下都能带来好处，尤其是当研究者试图分析数据或从多面向的问题中得出结论时。然而，必须认识到，dichotomization（二分法）也可能导致过度简化，从而掩盖了所研究主题的细微差别。例如，考虑基于个人政治信仰对个体进行分类。研究者通常将人们分为“自由派”或“保守派”。虽然这种dichotomization（二分法）使得分析和传播研究结果变得更加容易，但它未能捕捉到这两种极端之间存在的信仰光谱。许多人持有可能与两方都有所契合的观点，或者他们可能都不认同这两个类别。仅仅依赖于二元分类，研究者就可能忽视人类思想和行为的复杂性。此外，dichotomization（二分法）在心理学和健康等领域也可能产生重大影响。例如，心理健康诊断通常被分为“心理疾病”和“非心理疾病”。这种二元方法可能忽视了那些经历不同程度痛苦或功能障碍的灰色地带。这种简化可能导致治疗选项不足，并使那些被归类为“心理疾病”的人受到污名化，忽视了心理健康体验的光谱。另一个dichotomization（二分法）发挥关键作用的领域是教育。学生经常根据学业表现被分为不同的群体，通常被标记为“优秀”或“困难”。虽然这种分类旨在针对多样化需求量身定制教育方法，但它也可能无意中在学生中创造一种固定心态。被标记为“困难”的学生可能会内化这一身份，从而导致动机和自尊心的下降。相反，“优秀”的学生可能感受到持续高水平表现的压力，这可能导致焦虑和倦怠。在这里，dichotomization（二分法）不仅简化了教育环境，还延续了刻板印象，限制了个人成长的潜力。总之，尽管dichotomization（二分法）作为组织信息和促进分析的有用工具，但在使用这一方法时必须谨慎。研究者和从业者必须始终意识到二元分类固有的局限性。接受对复杂现象更细致的理解可以带来更丰富的见解和更有效的解决方案。我们必须承认，现实往往存在于一个连续体中，而不是在严格的类别之内。因此，虽然dichotomization（二分法）可能简化我们的理解，但我们必须努力欣赏超越二元框架的复杂性。