retributory

简明释义

英[/rɪˈtrɪb.jə.tɔːr.i/]美[/rɪˈtrɪb.jə.tɔːr.i/]

adj. 报应的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It is not only a retributory and destructive fire, but a disciplinary and creative process, whose aim is the salvation, through unification, of the entire planet.

这不只是一种反扑毁灭性的火焰，也是重整纪律再新创造的过程。目的是借由团结一致拯救整个地球。

2.It is not only a retributory and destructive fire, but a disciplinary and creative process, whose aim is the salvation, through unification, of the entire planet.

这不只是一种反扑毁灭性的火焰，也是重整纪律再新创造的过程。目的是借由团结一致拯救整个地球。

3.The philosopher argued against retributory 报应性的 justice, advocating instead for rehabilitation.

这位哲学家反对retributory 报应性的司法，主张应优先考虑康复。

4.The court decided that the punishment should be retributory 报应性的, aimed at ensuring justice for the victim.

法庭决定惩罚应是retributory 报应性的，旨在为受害者确保公正。

5.Many believe that a retributory 报应性的 approach to crime is necessary to deter future offenses.

许多人认为采取retributory 报应性的犯罪处理方式是必要的，以威慑未来的犯罪。

6.In some cultures, retributory 报应性的 justice is seen as a moral obligation to restore balance.

在某些文化中，retributory 报应性的司法被视为恢复平衡的道德义务。

7.The retributory 报应性的 nature of the law aims to provide closure for victims and their families.

法律的retributory 报应性的特性旨在为受害者及其家人提供结束感。

作文

In the realm of justice and morality, the concept of punishment often evokes a myriad of emotions and opinions. One particular term that encapsulates a specific approach to punishment is retributory. The retributory justice model posits that individuals who commit crimes deserve to be punished in a manner proportionate to their offenses. This idea has been a cornerstone of many legal systems around the world, emphasizing the need for accountability and moral responsibility. To understand the implications of retributory justice, it is essential to explore its philosophical underpinnings. The theory is rooted in the belief that crime is a violation of the social contract, and thus, society has the right to impose penalties on offenders. The primary goal of retributory justice is not to rehabilitate the offender or deter future crimes, but rather to ensure that justice is served by delivering punishment that reflects the severity of the wrongdoing. This perspective raises several questions about fairness and equality within the justice system. Critics of the retributory approach argue that it can lead to excessive punishments that do not necessarily contribute to societal safety or the rehabilitation of the offender. For instance, mandatory minimum sentences often result in lengthy prison terms for non-violent offenses, which some believe is an unjust application of retributory principles. Furthermore, there is a growing discourse surrounding restorative justice, which seeks to repair the harm caused by criminal behavior through reconciliation between victims and offenders, rather than focusing solely on punishment. Despite these criticisms, the retributory model remains influential in shaping public perceptions of justice. Many individuals feel a sense of satisfaction when they witness offenders receiving punishment commensurate with their crimes. This emotional response underscores the deep-seated belief in fairness and retribution that permeates society. For example, high-profile cases of violent crime often lead to public outcry for harsher penalties, reflecting a collective desire for retributory justice that resonates with the notion of 'an eye for an eye.' Moreover, the retributory justice model can sometimes serve as a deterrent to potential offenders. The fear of facing consequences that are proportionate to their actions may dissuade individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. However, the effectiveness of this deterrence is often debated, as some studies suggest that the certainty of punishment is more impactful than the severity of the penalty itself. In conclusion, the concept of retributory justice plays a significant role in our understanding of crime and punishment. While it emphasizes the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions, it also raises critical questions about the nature of justice and the balance between punishment and rehabilitation. As society continues to evolve, so too will the discussions surrounding retributory justice and its place within our legal systems. Ultimately, finding a harmonious balance between retribution and restoration may be key to fostering a more just and equitable society.

在正义和道德的领域中，惩罚的概念常常引发各种情感和观点。一个特别的术语，具体描述了一种惩罚方式，就是retributory。retributory司法模式认为，犯罪者应当受到与其罪行相称的惩罚。这一理念已成为世界许多法律体系的基石，强调责任和道德的重要性。要理解retributory司法的含义，必须探讨其哲学基础。这一理论植根于犯罪是对社会契约的侵犯，因此，社会有权对违法者施加惩罚。retributory司法的主要目标不是改造犯罪者或威慑未来的犯罪，而是通过给予与错误行为严重程度相符的惩罚来确保正义得到伸张。这一观点引发了关于公正和平等的问题。retributory方法的批评者认为，这可能导致过度的惩罚，而这些惩罚未必能为社会安全或犯罪者的改造做出贡献。例如，强制最低刑期往往会导致非暴力犯罪者被判处漫长的监禁，这被一些人视为对retributory原则的不公正应用。此外，围绕恢复性司法的讨论日益增多，该司法模式旨在通过受害者与犯罪者之间的和解来修复因犯罪行为造成的伤害，而不是仅仅关注惩罚。尽管存在这些批评，但retributory模式在塑造公众对正义的看法方面仍然具有重要影响。许多人在目睹犯罪者受到与其罪行相称的惩罚时感到一种满足感。这种情感反应突显了公平和报应的深层信念，这种信念渗透于社会之中。例如，暴力犯罪的高调案件往往引发公众对更严厉惩罚的呼声，反映出一种与“以眼还眼”的观念共鸣的集体愿望。此外，retributory司法模式有时可以作为潜在犯罪者的威慑。面对与其行为相称的后果的恐惧，可能会使个人不愿从事犯罪行为。然而，这种威慑的有效性常常受到争议，因为一些研究表明，惩罚的确定性比惩罚的严厉程度更具影响力。总之，retributory司法的概念在我们对犯罪和惩罚的理解中扮演着重要角色。虽然它强调追究个人行为责任的重要性，但也提出了关于正义性质和惩罚与改造之间平衡的重要问题。随着社会的不断发展，围绕retributory司法及其在我们法律体系中的位置的讨论也将继续演变。最终，在报应与修复之间找到和谐的平衡，可能是促进一个更公正和公平社会的关键。