over design

简明释义

保守设计

英英释义

例句

1.The architect was criticized for his tendency to over design 过度设计 the buildings, making them unnecessarily complex.

这位建筑师因其倾向于过度设计 过度设计建筑而受到批评，使得建筑不必要地复杂。

2.He learned the hard way that to over design 过度设计 a solution can lead to increased costs and delays.

他通过艰难的经历学到，过度设计 过度设计一个解决方案可能导致成本和延误增加。

3.The software team decided to simplify the interface instead of over design 过度设计 it with too many options.

软件团队决定简化界面，而不是通过过多选项来过度设计 过度设计它。

4.The marketing campaign was a failure because they tried to over design 过度设计 every aspect instead of focusing on the core message.

这个营销活动失败了，因为他们试图过度设计 过度设计每一个方面，而不是专注于核心信息。

5.In product development, it's important not to over design 过度设计 features that customers may not need.

在产品开发中，重要的是不要过度设计 过度设计客户可能不需要的功能。

作文

In the world of design, the concept of over design (过度设计) often emerges as a double-edged sword. On one hand, designers strive for perfection and innovation, pushing the boundaries of creativity to deliver products that not only meet but exceed user expectations. However, this pursuit can sometimes lead to over design (过度设计), where the final product becomes overly complicated or excessive in features, ultimately detracting from its usability and functionality.Take, for instance, the realm of consumer electronics. Many companies aim to create devices that are not just functional but also visually stunning. In their quest to achieve this, they may incorporate an array of features that, while impressive on paper, confuse the user experience. A perfect example is a smartphone that includes numerous camera modes, filters, and editing tools. While these features may appeal to tech enthusiasts, the average user might find themselves overwhelmed by the choices, leading to frustration rather than satisfaction. This is a classic case of over design (过度设计) where the intention to impress has resulted in a product that is difficult to use.Moreover, over design (过度设计) can manifest in architecture as well. Buildings that boast intricate facades and elaborate interiors can sometimes lose sight of practicality. For instance, a building designed with too many open spaces and large glass windows may look aesthetically pleasing, but it could lead to issues such as poor insulation and increased energy costs. In this scenario, the focus on design overshadows the essential principles of functionality and efficiency, highlighting the pitfalls of over design (过度设计).In contrast, effective design strikes a balance between aesthetics and usability. The best designs are those that enhance the user experience without overwhelming the individual. Minimalism has become a popular trend in recent years, emphasizing simplicity and clarity over complexity. Designers who adopt this approach understand that sometimes less is more, allowing users to engage with a product intuitively rather than feeling burdened by unnecessary features.Furthermore, the impact of over design (过度设计) extends beyond individual products. In branding and marketing, companies must be cautious not to overload their messaging. A brand that tries to communicate too much at once risks diluting its message and alienating potential customers. Clear, concise communication is often more effective than a barrage of information, reinforcing the idea that over design (过度设计) can occur not just in physical products but also in the way brands present themselves.In conclusion, while the desire to innovate and impress is a natural part of the design process, it is crucial for designers to remain mindful of the risks associated with over design (过度设计). By focusing on the needs and experiences of users, designers can create products that are not only beautiful but also functional and accessible. Ultimately, the goal should be to enhance the user experience rather than complicate it, ensuring that design serves its true purpose: to improve lives through thoughtful and effective solutions.

在设计的世界中，过度设计（over design）这一概念常常是把双刃剑。一方面，设计师们追求完美和创新，推动创造力的边界，以提供不仅满足用户期望而且超越其期望的产品。然而，这种追求有时会导致过度设计（over design），最终使得最终产品变得过于复杂或功能过剩，从而削弱了其可用性和功能性。以消费电子产品为例。许多公司旨在创造不仅功能强大而且视觉上令人惊叹的设备。在实现这一目标的过程中，他们可能会融入大量的功能，这些功能虽然在纸面上看起来令人印象深刻，但却使用户体验变得混乱。一个完美的例子是一款包含众多相机模式、滤镜和编辑工具的智能手机。虽然这些功能可能吸引科技爱好者，但普通用户可能会因选择过多而感到不知所措，导致沮丧而非满意。这是过度设计（over design）的经典案例，意图令人印象深刻的结果却导致了产品使用困难。此外，过度设计（over design）在建筑领域也可以表现出来。那些拥有复杂外立面和华丽内部的建筑，有时可能会失去实用性。例如，一座设计有太多开放空间和大型玻璃窗的建筑，虽然在美学上令人愉悦，但可能会导致隔热差和能源成本增加等问题。在这种情况下，设计的关注点掩盖了功能和效率的基本原则，突显了过度设计（over design）的陷阱。相比之下，有效的设计则在美学与可用性之间取得平衡。最佳的设计是那些增强用户体验而不让人感到压倒性的设计。近年来，极简主义已成为一种流行趋势，强调简单性和清晰性而非复杂性。采用这种方法的设计师明白，有时少即是多，让用户能够直观地与产品互动，而不是被不必要的功能所困扰。此外，过度设计（over design）的影响超越了单个产品。在品牌和营销中，公司必须谨慎，不要过载其信息传播。试图一次传达过多内容的品牌往往会稀释其信息，并疏远潜在客户。清晰、简洁的沟通通常比一系列信息更有效，进一步强调了过度设计（over design）不仅可能出现在实体产品中，也可能出现在品牌展示自身的方式中。总之，尽管创新和给人留下深刻印象的愿望是设计过程中的自然部分，但设计师必须时刻注意与过度设计（over design）相关的风险。通过关注用户的需求和体验，设计师可以创建不仅美观而且功能强大、易于接触的产品。最终，目标应该是增强用户体验，而不是使其复杂化，确保设计服务于其真正的目的：通过周到和有效的解决方案改善生活。