despot

简明释义

英[ˈdespɒt]美[ˈdespɑːt]

n. 专制君主，暴君；独裁者

n. （Despot）人名；（塞、罗）德斯波特

复 数 d e s p o t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Challenges despot sector questioned why the number of mortgage loans will spend money?

挑战霸王部门质疑按揭贷款房贷将花多少冤枉钱?。

2.Give your inner despot a breather and locate the magnanimous lover instead. It's time to give him or her a good workout.

给你内心的暴君一次段时间的休息，让位于宽宏大量的情人。

3.What had made pen at home such a dandy and such a despot? the women had spoiled him .

究竟是什么使潘在家中变成这么一个花花公子，这么一个独夫暴君呢？根源还是那些女人宠坏了他。

4.As Despot of the Morea, Constantine had been one of the few Byzantine generals to meet some success against the Turks.

在摩里亚的君主时，君士坦丁就已经率领拜占庭将军进行抗击土耳其人的斗争，并取得了一些胜利。

5.She indignantly condemns the despot for his towering crimes, which evoke the great wrath of the soldiers and the people.

她愤怒地控诉了南霸天的滔天罪行，激起军民怒火万丈。

6.And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.

如果那是一个你们想要废黜的暴君，先看看他竖立在你们心中的宝座是否已被摧毁。

7.Fashion is a despot whom the wise ridicule... and obey.

流行是一个会愚弄并且听从智者的暴君。

8.The despot, 独裁者 of the regime, ruled with an iron fist.

该政权的独裁者以铁腕手段统治。

9.In history, many famous leaders have been labeled as a despot, 专制君主 due to their oppressive rule.

在历史上，许多著名领导人因其压迫统治而被贴上专制君主的标签。

10.The country was ruled by a despot, 暴君 who suppressed any form of dissent.

这个国家由一位暴君统治，他压制任何形式的异议。

11.The citizens revolted against the despot, 暴君 who had violated their rights.

公民们反抗了侵犯他们权利的暴君。

12.Many people fled the nation to escape the tyranny of the despot, 专制者.

许多人逃离这个国家，以逃避专制者的暴政。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of a despot (专制者) has been a recurring theme in the narrative of power and governance. A despot is typically characterized as a ruler who wields absolute power, often in a cruel and oppressive manner. This form of leadership can be traced back to ancient civilizations where emperors and kings exerted their authority without any checks or balances. The actions of a despot often lead to significant consequences for their subjects, ranging from severe repression to widespread fear and unrest.One of the most infamous examples of a despot in modern history is Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953. Stalin's regime was marked by extreme authoritarianism, where dissent was not tolerated, and millions were purged or sent to labor camps. His reign exemplifies how a despot can manipulate power for personal gain and instill a culture of fear among the populace. The consequences of such leadership are often catastrophic, leading to loss of life and human rights violations.In contrast, democratic systems are designed to prevent the rise of a despot. By establishing checks and balances through various branches of government, democracies aim to ensure that no single entity can wield unchecked power. However, even in democratic societies, there are instances where leaders may exhibit despotic tendencies. For example, when elected officials begin to circumvent laws or undermine institutions meant to limit their power, they risk transitioning into a despot like figure.The rise of social media and the internet has also changed the dynamics of power in contemporary society. While these platforms can serve as tools for democracy, they can equally empower despots by enabling propaganda and censorship. In countries where freedom of speech is suppressed, leaders can utilize technology to maintain their grip on power, further blurring the lines between legitimate governance and despotic rule.Understanding the characteristics of a despot is crucial for recognizing potential threats to freedom and democracy. Common traits of a despot include a lack of tolerance for opposition, manipulation of legal systems to consolidate power, and the use of violence or intimidation to silence critics. Educating citizens about these traits can foster a more vigilant society that resists the allure of authoritarianism.Moreover, the legacy of despots serves as a cautionary tale for future generations. By studying the rise and fall of despotic regimes, individuals can learn the importance of safeguarding democratic values and institutions. History demonstrates that the absence of accountability and transparency can pave the way for tyranny.In conclusion, the term despot (专制者) encapsulates a significant aspect of political discourse, highlighting the dangers of unchecked power. As societies continue to evolve, it remains essential to remain vigilant against the emergence of despotic leaders. By fostering a culture of accountability and encouraging active participation in governance, we can work towards a future that honors freedom and democracy, steering clear of the dark shadows cast by despots throughout history.