navigability test

简明释义

适航性试验

英英释义

例句

1.During the usability evaluation, the navigability test revealed that the menu structure was confusing.

在可用性评估中，可导航性测试显示菜单结构令人困惑。

2.The website failed the navigability test, as many users reported difficulty locating key information.

该网站未通过可导航性测试，因为许多用户报告说很难找到关键信息。

3.The app's navigability test showed that users preferred a bottom navigation bar over a hamburger menu.

应用程序的可导航性测试显示用户更喜欢底部导航栏而不是汉堡菜单。

4.To improve user experience, the team revised the layout after the navigability test indicated several issues.

为了改善用户体验，团队在可导航性测试指出几个问题后修订了布局。

5.Before launching the new software, the development team conducted a navigability test to ensure users could easily find their way around the interface.

在发布新软件之前，开发团队进行了可导航性测试，以确保用户能够轻松找到界面中的各个部分。

作文

In the realm of law and environmental studies, the term navigability test holds significant importance. This concept is primarily used to determine whether a body of water can be considered navigable under legal standards. The navigability test essentially assesses whether a river, stream, or other waterway can support commercial navigation. This determination is crucial for several reasons, including regulatory jurisdiction, environmental protections, and economic development. To better understand the navigability test, one must first recognize the criteria that are typically employed in its application. Generally, the test examines two main factors: the physical characteristics of the waterway and its historical usage. Physically, the waterway must be deep and wide enough to accommodate various types of vessels. If a waterway is too shallow or narrow, it may not meet the requirements set forth by the navigability test. Historically, the use of the waterway also plays a pivotal role in this assessment. If a body of water has been used for commercial shipping or transport in the past, it strengthens the argument for its navigability. Conversely, if a waterway has never been utilized for such purposes, it may fail the navigability test. This aspect highlights the intersection of law and history, as judges often rely on historical documentation and evidence to make their determinations. The implications of the navigability test extend beyond just legal definitions; they touch upon environmental concerns as well. When a waterway is deemed navigable, it often comes under federal jurisdiction, which can lead to stricter environmental regulations. This is particularly important in the context of protecting wetlands and ecosystems. For instance, when a river is classified as navigable, any projects that might affect its flow or quality may require federal oversight, ensuring that ecological considerations are taken into account. Moreover, the navigability test can influence economic activities in the region. Navigable waterways are vital for trade and transportation, providing routes for goods to reach markets efficiently. Therefore, when a waterway is declared navigable, it can attract investments and stimulate local economies. On the other hand, if a waterway is not recognized as navigable, it may limit economic opportunities for communities that rely on water transport. In conclusion, the navigability test serves as a critical tool in determining the status of waterways within the legal framework. By evaluating both the physical attributes and historical usage of a body of water, this test helps establish whether it qualifies as navigable. The outcomes of this determination carry significant implications for environmental protection, legal jurisdiction, and economic development. As society continues to grapple with the balance between progress and preservation, understanding the navigability test becomes increasingly important. It not only shapes our waterways' future but also influences the communities that depend on them for their livelihoods and well-being.

在法律和环境研究领域，术语可航性测试具有重要意义。这个概念主要用于确定一个水体是否可以根据法律标准被视为可航行的。可航性测试本质上评估一条河流、溪流或其他水道是否能够支持商业航运。这一判定对于多个方面至关重要，包括监管管辖权、环境保护和经济发展。要更好地理解可航性测试，首先必须认识到通常在其应用中使用的标准。一般来说，该测试考察两个主要因素：水道的物理特征和历史使用情况。在物理上，水道必须足够深且宽，以容纳各种类型的船只。如果水道太浅或太窄，可能无法满足可航性测试所设定的要求。历史上，水道的使用也在这一评估中发挥着关键作用。如果一个水体曾被用于商业运输或航运，这将增强其可航性的论据。相反，如果一个水道从未被用于此类目的，它可能会未通过可航性测试。这一方面突显了法律与历史的交集，因为法官往往依赖历史文献和证据来做出判断。可航性测试的影响超越了法律定义；它还涉及环境问题。当一个水道被认为是可航行的时，它通常会受到联邦管辖，这可能导致更严格的环境法规。这在保护湿地和生态系统的背景下尤为重要。例如，当一条河流被归类为可航行时，任何可能影响其流动或质量的项目都可能需要联邦监督，从而确保生态考虑被纳入。此外，可航性测试还会影响该地区的经济活动。可航行水道对贸易和运输至关重要，为货物高效到达市场提供了路线。因此，当一条水道被宣布为可航行时，它可以吸引投资并刺激地方经济。另一方面，如果一条水道未被认可为可航行，它可能会限制依赖水路运输的社区的经济机会。总之，可航性测试作为确定水道在法律框架内状态的重要工具。通过评估水体的物理特征和历史使用情况，这一测试帮助确定它是否符合可航行的资格。这一判定的结果对环境保护、法律管辖权和经济发展具有重要影响。随着社会继续努力在进步与保护之间取得平衡，理解可航性测试变得愈发重要。它不仅塑造着我们水道的未来，还影响着依赖这些水道谋生和福祉的社区。