incriminating
简明释义
英[ɪnˈkrɪmɪneɪtɪŋ]美[ɪnˈkrɪmɪneɪtɪŋ]
adj. 显示有罪的
v. 使负罪;连累(incriminate 的现在分词)
英英释义
Tending to suggest that someone has committed a crime or done something wrong. | 倾向于暗示某人犯了罪或做错了事。 |
单词用法
提供有罪证据 | |
做出有罪陈述 | |
有罪信息 | |
有罪情形 |
同义词
妨碍的,危害的 | 妨碍的证据在法庭上被提出。 | ||
暗示有罪的 | The implicating documents revealed the suspect's involvement. | 那些暗示有罪的文件揭示了嫌疑人的参与。 | |
指控的 | 报告的指控语气引起了担忧。 | ||
致命的,令人无法辩解的 | 致命的证词毫无疑问地证明了他的罪行。 |
反义词
免罪的 | The evidence was exonerating, proving the defendant's innocence. | 证据是免罪的,证明了被告的清白。 | |
赦免的 | The judge issued an absolving statement after reviewing the new evidence. | 法官在审查新证据后发布了赦免声明。 |
例句
1.Lockdown Follows a police officer who returns to duty after recovering from a gun shot wound to discover incriminating evidence of illegal activities against those closest to him.
锁定跟随一名警察谁恢复从枪伤发现对那些最接近他的非法活动的罪证后,返回到责任。
2.Frank was convicted, despite evidence incriminating a janitor at the factory, but his death sentence was commuted when further evidence called his guilt into question.
尽管证据证明工厂的一个门卫也有罪,弗兰克还是被判有罪,但进一步的证据又对他的判决提出了疑问,于是他的死刑被减刑了。
3.Some enforcers are already stirring up trouble, threatening employees of online companies in one jurisdiction to get their employers based in another to fork over incriminating data for instance.
一些执法者已经挑起麻烦,他们威胁所在司法辖区在线公司的雇员,让身在其他辖区的雇主提供可作罪证的数据。
4.They were afraid of answering the questions and incriminating themselves.
他们担心因回答这些问题而受到牵连。
5.Many lawsuits require extensive “discovery”, which can mean sifting through nearly every e-mail your opponent has ever sent in search of one that sounds incriminating.
大多数的诉讼都需要广泛地进行“证据探索”,这意味这要从所有你的对手发出的邮件中筛选出一个可能有罪的证据。
6.Of those who admitted cheating, 65 percent had been caught out by their mobile, with a third saying their partner had read incriminating text messages.
在那些承认欺骗伴侣的人中,65%被手机上的内容被出卖,其中三分之一的人说伴侣看见了他们发送的“有罪”短信。
7.Police had reportedly searched his house and found incriminating evidence.
据报道,警察搜查了他的房子,并且发现了罪证。
8.Some enforcers are already stirring up trouble, threatening employees of online companies in one jurisdiction to get their employers based in another to fork over incriminating data for instance.
一些执法者已经挑起麻烦,他们威胁所在司法辖区在线公司的雇员,让身在其他辖区的雇主提供可作罪证的数据。
9.The incriminating substances are commonly used as antibiotics in treating inflammatory illnesses such as asthma and can be either ingested or injected.
被指控的物质其实是一种普通的用于治疗身体炎症的抗生素,用于治疗哮喘一类的疾病。可以口服或者注射。
10.She was worried that her text messages might contain incriminating details.
她担心她的短信可能包含有罪的细节。
11.The detective found incriminating evidence at the crime scene.
侦探在犯罪现场发现了有罪的证据。
12.He tried to destroy incriminating documents before the police arrived.
他试图在警方到达之前销毁有罪的文件。
13.The suspect's fingerprints were incriminating enough to lead to an arrest.
嫌疑人的指纹足以有罪,导致逮捕。
14.The lawyer argued that the incriminating video should be dismissed as evidence.
律师辩称该有罪的视频应被驳回作为证据。
作文
In the realm of criminal justice, the term incriminating refers to any evidence or information that can establish a person's involvement in a crime. This concept is crucial as it underpins the entire legal system, influencing how cases are prosecuted and defended. The implications of incriminating evidence can be profound, affecting not only the outcome of trials but also the lives of those involved. Consider a scenario where a suspect is arrested for a robbery. The police may gather various forms of evidence, such as fingerprints found at the crime scene, eyewitness testimonies, or surveillance footage. Each piece of evidence contributes to building a case against the suspect. If any of this evidence is deemed incriminating, it can significantly strengthen the prosecution's argument. However, the presence of incriminating evidence does not automatically guarantee a conviction. The defense has the right to challenge the validity of such evidence, arguing that it was obtained unlawfully or is circumstantial rather than direct. For instance, if the fingerprints were collected without a warrant, the defense could argue that they should be excluded from the trial. This highlights the delicate balance between law enforcement's need to secure incriminating evidence and the rights of the accused to a fair trial. Furthermore, the concept of incriminating evidence extends beyond physical proof. Statements made by a suspect can also be considered incriminating. For example, if a suspect admits to being at the crime scene during the time of the robbery, this admission can serve as powerful evidence against them. However, it is essential to note that confessions must be obtained legally, as coerced confessions can lead to wrongful convictions. The role of incriminating evidence raises ethical questions as well. In some cases, individuals may feel pressured to provide self-incriminating statements or evidence, fearing harsher penalties if they remain silent. This situation can create a moral dilemma for law enforcement, who must navigate the line between obtaining necessary evidence and ensuring the rights of suspects are upheld. Moreover, the media often plays a significant role in shaping public perception of incriminating evidence. High-profile cases frequently attract media attention, and the portrayal of evidence can influence public opinion before a trial even begins. This phenomenon can put additional pressure on the judicial system, as jurors may enter the courtroom with preconceived notions based on what they have seen or read in the news. Ultimately, the concept of incriminating evidence is a double-edged sword. While it serves as a vital tool for law enforcement in pursuing justice, it also poses risks to the rights of individuals and the integrity of the legal process. As society continues to grapple with these complexities, it is essential to ensure that the principles of justice and fairness remain at the forefront of legal proceedings. Understanding the nuances of incriminating evidence is crucial for anyone involved in the criminal justice system, whether as a legal professional, a defendant, or a member of the public. In conclusion, incriminating evidence plays a pivotal role in the legal landscape, shaping the outcomes of trials and influencing the lives of many. It is a term that embodies the intricate relationship between law enforcement, the judiciary, and the rights of individuals, reminding us of the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
在刑事司法领域,术语incriminating指的是可以证明一个人参与犯罪的任何证据或信息。这个概念至关重要,因为它支撑着整个法律系统,影响着案件的起诉和辩护。incriminating证据的影响可能深远,不仅影响审判的结果,还影响到相关人员的生活。考虑一个场景,一个嫌疑人因抢劫被逮捕。警方可能会收集各种形式的证据,例如在犯罪现场发现的指纹、目击者的证词或监控录像。每一条证据都有助于建立对嫌疑人的案件。如果这些证据被视为incriminating,它可以显著增强检方的论点。然而,incriminating证据的存在并不自动保证定罪。辩方有权质疑此类证据的有效性,辩称其是非法获得的,或者是间接而非直接的。例如,如果指纹是在没有搜查令的情况下收集的,辩方可以主张它们应被排除在审判之外。这突显了执法部门在获取incriminating证据与被告享有公正审判权之间的微妙平衡。此外,incriminating证据的概念不仅限于物理证据。嫌疑人所作的陈述也可以被视为incriminating。例如,如果嫌疑人承认在抢劫发生时在犯罪现场,这一承认可以作为对他们有力的证据。然而,必须注意的是,供词必须合法获得,因为强迫供词可能导致错误定罪。incriminating证据的角色还引发了伦理问题。在某些情况下,个人可能感到被迫提供自我incriminating的陈述或证据,担心如果保持沉默会面临更严厉的处罚。这种情况可能给执法部门带来道德困境,他们必须在获取必要证据和确保嫌疑人权利之间找到平衡。此外,媒体往往在塑造公众对incriminating证据的看法方面发挥重要作用。高调案件通常吸引媒体关注,而证据的呈现可能在审判开始之前就影响公众舆论。这种现象可能给司法系统施加额外压力,因为陪审员在进入法庭时可能已经带着基于他们在新闻中看到或阅读的内容的先入之见。最终,incriminating证据的概念是一把双刃剑。虽然它作为执法追求正义的重要工具,但它也对个人的权利和法律程序的完整性构成风险。随着社会继续应对这些复杂性,确保正义和公平原则始终处于法律程序的前沿至关重要。理解incriminating证据的细微差别对任何参与刑事司法系统的人都至关重要,无论是作为法律专业人士、被告还是公众成员。总之,incriminating证据在法律环境中发挥着关键作用,塑造着审判的结果并影响许多人的生活。这个术语体现了执法、司法和个人权利之间复杂的关系,提醒我们在被证明有罪之前,遵循正当程序和推定无罪的重要性。