maritime hegemony

简明释义

海上霸权

英英释义

例句

1.The rise of China has led to increased discussions about its aspirations for maritime hegemony 海洋霸权 in the South China Sea.

中国的崛起引发了关于其在南中国海追求海洋霸权 maritime hegemony 的讨论。

2.The concept of maritime hegemony 海洋霸权 is crucial for understanding international relations in coastal regions.

理解沿海地区国际关系时，海洋霸权 maritime hegemony 的概念至关重要。

3.The competition for maritime hegemony 海洋霸权 has intensified among major powers in recent years.

近年来，各大国之间对海洋霸权 maritime hegemony 的竞争加剧。

4.Historically, the British Empire was known for its maritime hegemony 海洋霸权 during the 19th century.

历史上，英国帝国因其在19世纪的海洋霸权 maritime hegemony 而闻名。

5.Naval exercises are often conducted to demonstrate a nation's commitment to maintaining maritime hegemony 海洋霸权.

海军演习通常是为了展示一个国家维护海洋霸权 maritime hegemony 的承诺。

作文

The concept of maritime hegemony has been a significant aspect of international relations and geopolitics throughout history. It refers to the dominance of a state over the seas, allowing it to control trade routes, establish naval bases, and project military power across vast oceanic expanses. This idea is not merely about having a powerful navy; it encompasses economic, political, and cultural influence that a nation can exert through its maritime capabilities.Historically, nations such as Britain and Spain exemplified maritime hegemony during their respective imperial periods. The British Empire, often referred to as the empire on which the sun never sets, established an extensive network of colonies and trade routes that spanned the globe. This dominance was facilitated by a formidable navy, enabling Britain to protect its interests and suppress rival powers. Similarly, Spain's control over the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans allowed it to amass great wealth and influence in the 16th and 17th centuries.In contemporary times, the notion of maritime hegemony has evolved with the rise of new powers. The United States, for instance, has maintained a significant presence in global waters since World War II, positioning itself as a leader in maritime security and freedom of navigation. The U.S. Navy's ability to operate freely in international waters has been a cornerstone of its foreign policy, deterring potential adversaries and ensuring the flow of trade.However, the dynamics of maritime hegemony are shifting with the emergence of China as a formidable maritime power. China's aggressive expansion in the South China Sea, characterized by the construction of artificial islands and militarization of disputed territories, poses challenges to existing maritime orders. This has sparked tensions with neighboring countries and the United States, leading to a complex interplay of diplomacy and military posturing.The competition for maritime hegemony raises important questions about global governance and the rules-based international order. As nations vie for control over critical sea lanes, the potential for conflict increases, necessitating cooperative frameworks to manage disputes. International treaties and agreements, such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), play crucial roles in defining maritime boundaries and rights, but enforcement remains a challenge.Moreover, the implications of maritime hegemony extend beyond military might. Economic interests are deeply intertwined with maritime dominance, as control over shipping routes directly impacts global trade. Nations that can secure these routes gain significant advantages in terms of economic growth and resource access. This interconnectedness underscores the importance of maintaining open and secure seas for all nations.In conclusion, maritime hegemony is a multifaceted concept that encompasses military, economic, and political dimensions. As the global landscape continues to evolve, understanding the implications of maritime dominance is crucial for policymakers and scholars alike. The competition for control over the seas will undoubtedly shape the future of international relations, making it imperative to foster dialogue and cooperation among nations to ensure stability and peace on the high seas.

“海洋霸权”这一概念在历史上一直是国际关系和地缘政治的重要方面。它指的是一个国家对海洋的主导地位，使其能够控制贸易路线、建立海军基地，并在广阔的海洋上投射军事力量。这个概念不仅仅关乎拥有强大的海军；它还包括一个国家通过其海洋能力所能施加的经济、政治和文化影响。历史上，英国和西班牙等国家在各自的帝国时期体现了“海洋霸权”。大英帝国常被称为“日不落帝国”，建立了一个遍布全球的殖民地和贸易网络。这种主导地位得益于强大的海军，使英国能够保护其利益并压制对手的力量。同样，西班牙对大西洋和太平洋的控制使其在16世纪和17世纪积累了巨大的财富和影响力。在当代，“海洋霸权”的概念随着新兴大国的崛起而演变。例如，自第二次世界大战以来，美国在全球水域保持了显著的存在，将自己定位为海洋安全和航行自由的领导者。美国海军能够在国际水域自由行动，这一直是其外交政策的基石，威慑潜在对手并确保贸易流动。然而，随着中国作为强大的海洋大国的崛起，“海洋霸权”的动态正发生变化。中国在南海的激进扩张，以建设人工岛屿和军事化争议领土为特征，对现有的海洋秩序构成了挑战。这引发了与邻国及美国之间的紧张关系，导致外交和军事姿态之间复杂的互动。对“海洋霸权”的竞争提出了关于全球治理和基于规则的国际秩序的重要问题。当各国争夺关键海路的控制权时，冲突的潜力增加，这就需要合作框架来管理争端。国际条约和协议，如《联合国海洋法公约》（UNCLOS），在界定海洋边界和权利方面发挥着至关重要的作用，但执行仍然是一个挑战。此外，“海洋霸权”的影响超越了军事力量。经济利益与海洋主导地位深度交织，因为对航运路线的控制直接影响全球贸易。能够确保这些航线的国家在经济增长和资源获取方面获得了显著优势。这种相互关联性强调了维护所有国家开放和安全海洋的重要性。总之，“海洋霸权”是一个多维概念，涵盖了军事、经济和政治层面。随着全球格局的不断演变，理解海洋主导地位的影响对于政策制定者和学者来说至关重要。对海洋控制权的竞争无疑将塑造国际关系的未来，因此，各国必须加强对话与合作，以确保高海洋上的稳定与和平。