majority decision

简明释义

多数判决

英英释义

例句

1.The board reached a majority decision on the new budget proposal.

董事会就新预算提案达成了多数决定。

2.After much debate, the council arrived at a majority decision to build a new park.

经过激烈的辩论，市议会达成了建设新公园的多数决定。

3.The committee's majority decision favored the implementation of new policies.

委员会的多数决定支持实施新政策。

4.In the meeting, a majority decision was made to extend the project deadline.

在会议上，做出了将项目截止日期延长的多数决定。

5.The majority decision to change the venue for the event was unexpected.

改变活动地点的多数决定令人意外。

作文

In a democratic society, the concept of decision-making is fundamental to governance and social order. One of the most prevalent methods through which decisions are made is via a majority decision. A majority decision refers to a choice or conclusion reached when more than half of the participants or voters agree on a particular issue. This principle is essential in various contexts, including political elections, organizational meetings, and even casual group discussions. Understanding how a majority decision works can provide insights into the dynamics of collective decision-making and its implications for society.To illustrate the importance of a majority decision, consider a local community meeting where residents gather to discuss the construction of a new park. If the majority of attendees support the project, their collective agreement leads to a majority decision that will guide the local government’s actions. This process not only reflects the will of the people but also fosters a sense of community involvement and ownership over local issues.However, while a majority decision is a powerful tool for achieving consensus, it is not without its challenges. One significant concern is the potential for the 'tyranny of the majority,' where the preferences of the majority may overshadow or disregard the rights and needs of minority groups. For instance, if a majority decision is made to build a facility that benefits the majority but negatively impacts a minority community, ethical dilemmas arise. This highlights the importance of protecting minority rights in any decision-making process, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered.In political settings, the majority decision is often used to pass legislation or elect representatives. For example, in many parliamentary systems, a bill must receive a majority decision from the members present to become law. This system promotes accountability, as elected officials must align their policies with the preferences of their constituents to secure the necessary votes. However, it can also lead to polarization, where parties focus on rallying their base rather than seeking common ground with opposing views.Moreover, the reliance on a majority decision can sometimes lead to hasty conclusions without thorough deliberation. In fast-paced environments, groups may rush to a decision to meet deadlines, potentially overlooking critical factors or alternative solutions. Such scenarios underline the need for balance between efficiency and comprehensive analysis in decision-making processes.In conclusion, a majority decision serves as a cornerstone of democratic governance and collective action. It embodies the principle of majority rule, allowing groups to reach conclusions that reflect the preferences of the larger population. However, it is crucial to approach majority decisions with caution, ensuring that the rights of minorities are protected and that decisions are made thoughtfully. By fostering an inclusive environment where all voices are valued, societies can enhance the effectiveness of majority decisions while promoting harmony and understanding among diverse groups. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a decision-making framework that respects both the majority's will and the minority's rights, leading to a more equitable and just society.

在一个民主社会中，决策的概念对治理和社会秩序至关重要。决策最常见的方法之一是通过多数决策。多数决策是指当超过一半的参与者或选民就某个特定问题达成一致时所做出的选择或结论。这一原则在各种场合中都很重要，包括政治选举、组织会议，甚至是随意的团体讨论。理解多数决策的运作方式可以为我们提供有关集体决策动态及其对社会影响的深刻见解。为了说明多数决策的重要性，考虑一个地方社区会议，居民聚集在一起讨论建设一个新公园的问题。如果大多数与会者支持这个项目，他们的集体同意将导致一个多数决策，这将指导地方政府的行动。这一过程不仅反映了人民的意愿，还促进了社区参与和对地方事务的归属感。然而，虽然多数决策是实现共识的强大工具，但它并非没有挑战。一个重要的担忧是“多数人的暴政”，即多数人的偏好可能会压倒或无视少数群体的权利和需求。例如，如果做出一个多数决策来建造一个惠及多数人的设施，但对少数社区产生负面影响，那么就会出现伦理困境。这突显了在任何决策过程中保护少数群体权利的重要性，确保所有声音都被听到和考虑。在政治环境中，多数决策通常用于通过立法或选举代表。例如，在许多议会制国家中，一项法案必须得到出席成员的多数决策才能成为法律。这一制度促进了问责制，因为当选官员必须使他们的政策与选民的偏好保持一致，以获得必要的投票。然而，这也可能导致两极化，政党专注于动员他们的基础，而不是寻求与对立观点的共同点。此外，依赖多数决策有时可能导致在缺乏充分审议的情况下得出草率的结论。在快速变化的环境中，团体可能会急于做出决定以满足截止日期，可能会忽视关键因素或替代解决方案。这种情况强调了在决策过程中在效率和全面分析之间取得平衡的必要性。总之，多数决策作为民主治理和集体行动的基石，体现了多数规则的原则，使团体能够达成反映更大人口偏好的结论。然而，谨慎地处理多数决策至关重要，确保保护少数人的权利，并且决策是经过深思熟虑的。通过营造一个包容的环境，让所有声音都被重视，社会可以增强多数决策的有效性，同时促进不同群体之间的和谐与理解。最终，目标应该是创建一个尊重多数意愿和少数人权利的决策框架，从而导致一个更加公平和公正的社会。