bureaucratize

简明释义

英[bjʊəˈrɒkrətaɪz]美[bjʊˈrɑːkrəˈtaɪz]

vi. 使官僚化；发展成为官僚主义

第 三 人 称 单 数 b u r e a u c r a t i z e s

现 在 分 词 b u r e a u c r a t i z i n g

过 去 式 b u r e a u c r a t i z e d

过 去 分 词 b u r e a u c r a t i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.If they are not big enough and we bureaucratize them, we can often extend the length of time and money it takes by orders of magnitude.

如果项目看上去不够大，我们就把它交给相关机构去慢慢研究，常常以此来使其获得好几倍额外的时间和资金投入。

2.If they are not big enough and we bureaucratize them, we can often extend the length of time and money it takes by orders of magnitude.

如果项目看上去不够大，我们就把它交给相关机构去慢慢研究，常常以此来使其获得好几倍额外的时间和资金投入。

3.Some argue that we should avoid bureaucratizing 官僚化 creative processes to foster innovation.

一些人认为我们应该避免<品>官僚化创造性过程，以促进创新。

4.The new management policy might bureaucratize 官僚化 the workflow, slowing down productivity.

新的管理政策可能会<品>官僚化工作流程，从而降低生产力。

5.If we continue to bureaucratize 官僚化 our operations, we risk losing our competitive edge.

如果我们继续<品>官僚化我们的运营，我们将面临失去竞争优势的风险。

6.The attempt to bureaucratize 官僚化 the school system has met with significant resistance from teachers.

试图<品>官僚化学校系统遭到了教师们的强烈反对。

7.Many organizations tend to bureaucratize 官僚化 their processes, making it harder for employees to make quick decisions.

许多组织倾向于<品>官僚化他们的流程，使员工更难做出快速决策。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, organizations often face the challenge of maintaining efficiency while ensuring that their processes are compliant with regulations. As a result, many institutions tend to bureaucratize their operations. To bureaucratize (使官僚化) means to implement rigid procedures and formalities that can sometimes hinder creativity and flexibility. This essay will explore the implications of bureaucratizing an organization and how it can affect overall productivity.When an organization decides to bureaucratize, it usually starts by establishing a clear hierarchy and defining roles and responsibilities. While this structure can provide clarity, it can also create bottlenecks in decision-making processes. For instance, if every small decision requires approval from multiple levels of management, the time taken to execute even simple tasks can increase significantly. Employees may feel frustrated as they are forced to navigate through layers of bureaucracy to get their work done.Moreover, bureaucratizing can lead to a culture of compliance rather than innovation. When employees are more focused on following procedures than on generating new ideas, the organization's ability to adapt to changes in the market diminishes. In industries where creativity is essential, such as technology or marketing, a bureaucratic approach can stifle innovation and lead to a decline in competitiveness.Another consequence of bureaucratizing is the potential for decreased employee morale. When individuals feel that their autonomy is limited by excessive regulations, they may become disengaged. This disengagement can manifest in lower productivity and higher turnover rates. Employees thrive in environments where they feel empowered to make decisions and contribute to the organization's goals. Therefore, it is crucial for leaders to strike a balance between necessary procedures and allowing flexibility.On the other hand, some level of bureaucracy is necessary for large organizations to function effectively. Policies and procedures help ensure consistency and fairness, especially in areas like human resources and finance. The key is to find a way to bureaucratize without suffocating the creative spirit of the workforce. One approach could be to implement a more agile framework that allows for quick decision-making while still adhering to essential guidelines.In conclusion, while bureaucratizing can bring structure and order to an organization, it is vital to be aware of its potential drawbacks. Leaders must carefully evaluate which processes are necessary and which may be hindering progress. By fostering an environment that encourages both compliance and innovation, organizations can reap the benefits of a well-structured system without sacrificing creativity. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a workplace where employees feel valued and empowered, leading to greater overall success for the organization.

在当今快节奏的世界中，组织通常面临在确保流程符合规定的同时保持效率的挑战。因此，许多机构往往倾向于使其运营官僚化。官僚化（使官僚化）意味着实施严格的程序和形式，这有时会阻碍创造力和灵活性。本文将探讨官僚化组织的影响以及它如何影响整体生产力。当一个组织决定官僚化时，通常会首先建立明确的层级结构并定义角色和责任。虽然这种结构可以提供清晰度，但也可能在决策过程中造成瓶颈。例如，如果每个小决策都需要经过多个管理层的批准，那么即使是简单任务的执行所需时间也会显著增加。当员工被迫通过层层官僚体系来完成工作时，他们可能会感到沮丧。此外，官僚化还可能导致合规文化而非创新文化。当员工更多地关注遵循程序而不是产生新想法时，组织适应市场变化的能力就会减弱。在创造力至关重要的行业，如技术或市场营销，官僚主义的方法可能会扼杀创新，导致竞争力下降。官僚化的另一个后果是员工士气可能下降。当个人感到他们的自主权受到过多规章制度的限制时，他们可能会变得不再投入。这种不投入可能表现为生产力下降和员工流失率上升。员工在感到有权做出决策并为组织目标做出贡献的环境中茁壮成长。因此，领导者必须在必要的程序和允许灵活性之间找到平衡。另一方面，某种程度的官僚主义对于大型组织有效运作是必要的。政策和程序有助于确保一致性和公平性，特别是在人力资源和财务等领域。关键在于找到一种方法，使官僚化不会窒息员工的创造精神。一种方法可能是实施更敏捷的框架，允许快速决策，同时仍然遵循基本准则。总之，虽然官僚化可以为组织带来结构和秩序，但认识到其潜在缺点至关重要。领导者必须仔细评估哪些流程是必要的，哪些可能在阻碍进步。通过营造一个鼓励合规和创新的环境，组织可以在不牺牲创造力的情况下收获良好结构系统的好处。最终，目标应该是创造一个员工感到被重视和赋权的工作场所，从而为组织带来更大的整体成功。