Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision
简明释义
船舶碰撞间接损失
英英释义
Loss or damage that occurs as a secondary effect of a collision, rather than as a direct result of the impact itself. | 由于碰撞而间接造成的损失或损害,而不是碰撞本身直接导致的结果。 |
例句
1.Due to the Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision, the repair costs exceeded the initial estimates.
由于因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害,修理费用超过了最初的估算。
2.After the car accident, the driver realized that the Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision included the damage to the streetlight.
在车祸后,司机意识到因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害包括路灯的损坏。
3.The company was held responsible for the Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision when their truck hit a parked vehicle, leading to property damage.
当他们的卡车撞上停放的车辆,导致财产损失时,公司被追究了因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害的责任。
4.The policy explicitly states that Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision is not covered under standard terms.
该政策明确指出,标准条款下不涵盖因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害。
5.The insurance policy does not cover Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision, which means you won't be compensated for any secondary damages.
保险政策不包括因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害,这意味着您不会获得任何次要损害的赔偿。
作文
In the realm of insurance and liability, certain terms often surface that encapsulate complex scenarios. One such phrase is Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision. This term refers to the consequences that arise not directly from a collision itself, but rather as a secondary effect of that event. Understanding this concept is crucial for both policyholders and insurers alike. To illustrate, consider a scenario where two vehicles collide on a busy highway. The immediate damage might involve the vehicles themselves, leading to repairs and medical expenses for the parties involved. However, the repercussions can extend far beyond this initial incident. For instance, if the collision causes a traffic jam, the resulting delays could lead to missed appointments, lost wages, or even additional fuel costs for other drivers stuck in the congestion. These are examples of Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision, as they stem from the collision but are not the direct result of it.Moreover, businesses can also suffer from such indirect losses. Imagine a delivery truck involved in a collision that blocks a major intersection. The disruption might prevent other delivery vehicles from reaching their destinations on time, leading to customer dissatisfaction and potential loss of business. In this case, the business could argue that they have experienced Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision due to the unforeseen consequences of the initial accident.This concept also plays a significant role in legal disputes. When determining liability, courts may need to assess whether the indirect losses were foreseeable at the time of the collision. If a driver caused an accident, they might be held accountable not only for the direct damages but also for any subsequent losses incurred by others affected by the incident. This adds layers of complexity to legal cases and insurance claims, making it essential for all parties involved to understand the implications of Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision.From an insurance perspective, policies may vary in their coverage of indirect losses. Some policies might explicitly include provisions for such damages, while others may limit or exclude them entirely. This discrepancy highlights the importance of thoroughly reading and understanding insurance contracts before signing. Policyholders should be aware of what is covered under their plans, particularly regarding Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision, to avoid unpleasant surprises when filing a claim.In conclusion, the phrase Loss or Damage Indirectly Caused by Collision encapsulates a range of potential consequences that can arise from vehicular accidents. By recognizing the broader implications of collisions, individuals and businesses can better prepare for the financial and logistical challenges that may follow. Whether through careful insurance planning or legal consideration, understanding this concept is vital in navigating the complexities of road incidents and their aftermath.
在保险和责任的领域中,某些术语经常出现,概括了复杂的情境。其中一个短语是因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害。这个术语指的是由于碰撞本身而产生的后果,而不是直接由该事件引起的后果。理解这个概念对投保人和保险公司都至关重要。举个例子,考虑一种情况,两辆车辆在繁忙的高速公路上相撞。直接的损坏可能涉及车辆本身,导致维修和相关方的医疗费用。然而,后果可能远远超出这一初始事件。例如,如果碰撞导致交通堵塞,随之而来的延误可能导致错过约会、工资损失,甚至其他被困在拥堵中的司机额外的燃料费用。这些都是因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害的例子,因为它们源于碰撞,但并不是直接结果。此外,企业也可能遭受此类间接损失。想象一下,一辆送货卡车发生碰撞,阻塞了主要交叉口。干扰可能会阻止其他送货车辆准时到达目的地,导致客户不满和潜在的业务损失。在这种情况下,企业可以辩称,他们因初始事故的不可预见后果而经历了因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害。这一概念在法律争议中也发挥着重要作用。在确定责任时,法院可能需要评估间接损失在碰撞发生时是否可预见。如果一名驾驶员造成了一起事故,他们可能不仅要对直接损害负责,还要对因事故影响的其他人所遭受的后续损失承担责任。这为法律案件和保险索赔增加了复杂性,因此所有相关方都必须理解因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害的影响。从保险的角度来看,保单在对间接损失的覆盖范围上可能会有所不同。有些保单可能明确包括此类损失的条款,而其他保单则可能完全限制或排除这些损失。这种差异突显了在签署之前仔细阅读和理解保险合同的重要性。投保人应了解其计划下的保障内容,特别是关于因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害,以避免在提出索赔时出现意外情况。总之,短语因碰撞间接造成的损失或损害概括了可能因机动车事故而产生的一系列潜在后果。通过认识到碰撞的更广泛影响,个人和企业可以更好地为随之而来的财务和后勤挑战做好准备。无论是通过谨慎的保险规划还是法律考量,理解这一概念对于驾驭道路事件及其后果的复杂性至关重要。
相关单词