adjudicative

简明释义

英[əˈdʒuːdɪkətɪv]美[əˈdʒʊdɪˌketɪv]

adj. 判决的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Wang Hongcheng thinks, compensating for a standard is adjudicative difficulty all the time surely really.

王宏丞则认为，赔偿标准的确定一直是判决难点。

2.The passivity of adjudicative power is capable of preventing a judges peremptoriness effectively and ensuring fair adjudications.

司法权的被动性能有效防止审判权的专横擅断，确保裁判公正。

3.The adjudicative fact is different from the objective fact , is only a relative fact, and concerns the question of the truth or falsehood.

裁判事实不同于这种意义上的绝对事实，它只是一种相对事实，而且作为事实命题存在真假问题。

4.Judicial experience and wisdom is the soul of a judicial adjudicative document.

司法经验与智慧是裁判文书的灵魂。

5.The self-admission in civil proceeding can confine adjudicative power and free the litigant of burden of proof.

民事诉讼中的自认，具有拘束审判权力和免除一方当事人举证责任的功能。

6.This standard won't produce any effects to judicatory adjudgement, also won't control adjudicative outcome.

这个标准不会对司法审判产生任何影响，也不会左右判决结果。

7.The administrative board has adjudicative 裁决的 authority to settle complaints.

行政委员会有< span>裁决的权力来解决投诉。

8.The court's role is primarily adjudicative 裁决的, resolving disputes between parties.

法院的角色主要是< span>裁决的，解决当事人之间的争议。

9.The adjudicative 裁决的 functions of the tribunal are crucial for maintaining order.

法庭的< span>裁决的职能对维护秩序至关重要。

10.In a legal context, an adjudicative 裁决的 process is essential for fair outcomes.

在法律背景下，裁决的过程对公平结果至关重要。

11.An adjudicative 裁决的 approach can help clarify the rules in a competition.

一种< span>裁决的方法可以帮助澄清比赛中的规则。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the term adjudicative refers to processes or actions that involve making a formal judgment or decision regarding a dispute or legal matter. This concept is essential in various fields, including judicial systems, arbitration, and administrative procedures. The adjudicative functions are critical as they ensure that conflicts are resolved fairly and justly, adhering to established laws and regulations.One of the primary roles of an adjudicative body, such as a court or tribunal, is to interpret the law and apply it to specific cases. This involves examining evidence, hearing testimonies, and considering legal arguments presented by both parties involved in a dispute. The adjudicative process culminates in a ruling or verdict, which not only resolves the immediate conflict but also sets precedents for future cases. This aspect of the legal system underscores the importance of having a structured approach to conflict resolution, ensuring that all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case.Moreover, the adjudicative nature of legal proceedings helps maintain social order and trust in the system. When individuals believe that their disputes will be handled impartially, they are more likely to engage in lawful behavior and seek resolution through appropriate channels rather than resorting to violence or self-help. Thus, the adjudicative function serves a broader societal purpose, reinforcing the rule of law and promoting stability within communities.In addition to traditional courts, there are various forms of adjudicative mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation. These alternative dispute resolution methods provide parties with options outside of the conventional court system. While arbitration typically involves a neutral third party making a binding decision, mediation focuses on facilitating communication between disputants to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Both methods retain the adjudicative essence of resolving conflicts, albeit through different approaches.The significance of adjudicative processes extends beyond individual cases. They play a crucial role in shaping laws and policies. Judicial decisions often influence legislative actions, prompting lawmakers to amend existing laws or create new statutes in response to court rulings. This dynamic relationship between the adjudicative system and the legislative framework highlights how legal interpretations can lead to societal changes, reflecting evolving values and norms.Furthermore, the adjudicative process is not without its challenges. Issues such as bias, access to justice, and procedural fairness can undermine the integrity of legal decisions. It is imperative for adjudicative bodies to uphold principles of transparency and accountability to foster public confidence in the system. Continuous reforms and training for judges and arbitrators are essential to address these challenges and enhance the effectiveness of adjudicative mechanisms.In conclusion, the term adjudicative encapsulates a vital component of our legal system, representing the processes through which disputes are resolved and justice is served. Whether in a courtroom or through alternative dispute resolution, the adjudicative functions play a pivotal role in maintaining order, ensuring fairness, and influencing the development of laws. As society evolves, so too must our adjudicative practices, adapting to new challenges while remaining steadfast in their commitment to justice.

在法律和治理的领域中，术语adjudicative指的是涉及对争端或法律事务作出正式判断或决定的过程或行动。这个概念在包括司法系统、仲裁和行政程序等多个领域中至关重要。adjudicative功能是关键，因为它们确保冲突得到公正合理的解决，遵循既定的法律和规定。一个adjudicative机构（如法院或法庭）的主要角色之一是解释法律并将其应用于具体案件。这涉及审查证据、听取证词以及考虑双方提出的法律论点。adjudicative过程以裁决或判决为结尾，不仅解决了眼前的冲突，还为未来的案件设定了先例。法律系统的这一方面强调了采用结构化冲突解决方法的重要性，确保所有各方都有公平的机会陈述他们的案件。此外，法律程序的adjudicative特性有助于维护社会秩序和对系统的信任。当个人相信他们的争端将被公正处理时，他们更有可能遵守法律行为，并通过适当渠道寻求解决，而不是诉诸暴力或自我救助。因此，adjudicative功能服务于更广泛的社会目的，强化法治并促进社区的稳定。除了传统法院，还有各种形式的adjudicative机制，如仲裁和调解。这些替代争端解决方法为各方提供了超越传统法院系统的选择。虽然仲裁通常涉及中立第三方作出具有约束力的决定，但调解则侧重于促进争端方之间的沟通，以帮助他们达成双方都能接受的协议。这两种方法保留了adjudicative解决冲突的本质，尽管采用了不同的方法。adjudicative过程的重要性超越了个别案件。它们在塑造法律和政策方面发挥着关键作用。司法决定往往影响立法行动，促使立法者根据法院裁决修改现有法律或制定新法规。这种adjudicative系统与立法框架之间的动态关系突显了法律解释如何导致社会变化，反映不断发展的价值观和规范。此外，adjudicative过程并非没有挑战。偏见、获得正义的机会和程序公正等问题可能会削弱法律决定的完整性。adjudicative机构必须坚持透明和问责原则，以增强公众对系统的信心。持续的改革和对法官及仲裁员的培训对于应对这些挑战和提高adjudicative机制的有效性至关重要。总之，术语adjudicative概括了我们法律系统的重要组成部分，代表着通过这些过程解决争端和实现正义的方式。无论是在法庭上还是通过替代争端解决方式，adjudicative功能在维护秩序、确保公正和影响法律的发展中发挥着关键作用。随着社会的演变，我们的adjudicative实践也必须不断适应新挑战，同时坚守对正义的承诺。