blaspheme
简明释义
vt. 亵渎;咒骂,辱骂
vi. 说亵渎的话;口出恶言
第 三 人 称 单 数 b l a s p h e m e s
现 在 分 词 b l a s p h e m i n g
过 去 式 b l a s p h e m e d
过 去 分 词 b l a s p h e m e d
英英释义
单词用法
对...进行亵渎 | |
亵渎上帝 | |
在公众场合亵渎 | |
被指控亵渎 |
同义词
亵渎的 | 他在布道期间被指控使用亵渎的语言。 | ||
亵渎神明 | 这个行为被当地社区视为亵渎神明。 | ||
不敬 | 她对传统价值观的不敬让许多人感到震惊。 | ||
不虔诚 | His impiety was evident in his disregard for religious practices. | 他的不虔诚在于他对宗教习俗的漠视。 |
反义词
尊敬 | 许多人尊敬他们的宗教领袖。 | ||
崇敬 | The community venerated the traditions passed down through generations. | 社区崇敬代代相传的传统。 |
例句
1.To blaspheme the earth is now the dreadfulest sin, and to rate the heart of the unknowable higher than the meaning of the earth!
现在最可怕的罪过是亵渎大地,将‘不可知’的心置于高于大地的意义的位置!
2.Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.
只是你行这事,叫耶和华的仇敌大得亵渎的机会,故此,你所得的孩子必定要死。
3.Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander, whom I have delivered up to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.
其中有依默纳约和亚历山大,我已把他们交给撒殚,为叫他们学习不再亵渎。
4.Does not let the common custom blaspheme. My all properties 90% will donate gives Vienna the Stephen church. Asks Father Luo Sefu the agent to receive and sign.
我的所有财产90%将捐赠给维也纳斯蒂芬教堂,请罗瑟夫神父代理签收。
5.Shall the enemy blaspheme thy name for ever?
仇敌亵渎你的名,要到永远吗。
6.Is it not they who blaspheme the honorable name by which you are called?
他们不是亵渎那在你们身上被称呼的尊名么?
7."Don't blaspheme," my mother said.
“不要亵渎神明,”我妈妈说。
8.Did we miss a few heretical texts? Blaspheme us in the comments section.
遗漏了一些离经叛道文本?可上评语栏亵渎我们。
9.The comedian's jokes were seen as an attempt to blaspheme the faith of millions.
这位喜剧演员的笑话被视为试图亵渎数百万人的信仰。
10.Some argue that art should be free to blaspheme established norms.
有人认为艺术应该自由地亵渎既定规范。
11.He was accused of trying to blaspheme the sacred traditions of the church.
他被指控试图亵渎教会的神圣传统。
12.In many cultures, it is considered a crime to blaspheme against religious beliefs.
在许多文化中,亵渎宗教信仰被视为犯罪。
13.The book was banned for its content that was deemed to blaspheme religious figures.
这本书因其内容被认为亵渎宗教人物而被禁。
作文
In today's society, the concept of freedom of speech is often debated, particularly when it comes to topics that may offend certain groups. One such topic is religion, where the act of using language that is disrespectful or irreverent can lead to serious consequences. The term blaspheme refers to the act of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; it is an offense that has been taken seriously in many cultures throughout history. This essay will explore the implications of blaspheme in modern society, its historical context, and the balance between free expression and respect for religious beliefs.Historically, blaspheme has been a punishable offense in various societies. In ancient times, individuals who were accused of blaspheming often faced severe penalties, including imprisonment or even death. For example, in medieval Europe, the church wielded significant power, and any form of blasphemy could result in excommunication or execution. These harsh measures were intended to maintain the sanctity of religious beliefs and protect the community from what was perceived as dangerous ideas.In contemporary society, the definition of blaspheme has evolved, but the tensions surrounding it remain. With the rise of social media and digital communication, people can express their opinions more freely than ever before. However, this freedom comes with the risk of offending others, particularly when discussing religious matters. Many individuals and groups have taken to the internet to voice their opinions, leading to heated debates and, in some cases, violent reactions. The Charlie Hebdo attack in France serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of blaspheming against religious figures or symbols.The challenge lies in finding a balance between protecting free speech and respecting the beliefs of others. On one hand, individuals should have the right to express their thoughts and opinions without fear of retribution. This principle is foundational to democratic societies and encourages open dialogue and debate. On the other hand, the act of blaspheming can deeply hurt those who hold their beliefs sacred. When someone mocks or disrespects a religion, it can create divisions and escalate tensions within communities.To navigate this complex issue, it is essential to foster an environment of mutual respect and understanding. Education plays a crucial role in this process. By teaching individuals about different religions and their significance, we can cultivate empathy and reduce the likelihood of blaspheming inadvertently. Furthermore, encouraging critical thinking allows individuals to engage with differing viewpoints while still maintaining respect for others' beliefs.In conclusion, the act of blaspheme carries significant weight in both historical and modern contexts. As we continue to grapple with the implications of free speech, it is vital to recognize the importance of respectful dialogue. While it is essential to protect the right to express oneself, we must also be aware of the impact our words can have on others. Striking a balance between these two ideals is crucial for fostering a harmonious society where diverse beliefs can coexist peacefully.
在当今社会,自由言论的概念经常受到辩论,特别是涉及可能冒犯某些群体的话题。其中一个话题是宗教,使用不尊重或不敬的语言的行为可能会导致严重后果。术语blaspheme指的是对上帝或神圣事物说亵渎性言论的行为;这是许多文化历史上被严肃对待的冒犯。本文将探讨blaspheme在现代社会中的影响、其历史背景,以及自由表达与尊重宗教信仰之间的平衡。历史上,blaspheme在各种社会中都是一种可惩罚的罪行。在古代,被指控blaspheming的人往往面临严厉的惩罚,包括监禁甚至死亡。例如,在中世纪的欧洲,教会拥有巨大的权力,任何形式的blasphemy都可能导致逐出教会或处决。这些严厉的措施旨在维护宗教信仰的神圣性,并保护社区免受被视为危险思想的侵害。在当代社会,blaspheme的定义已经演变,但围绕它的紧张关系依然存在。随着社交媒体和数字通信的兴起,人们可以比以往任何时候都更自由地表达自己的观点。然而,这种自由伴随着冒犯他人的风险,特别是在讨论宗教问题时。许多个人和团体已开始利用互联网表达他们的观点,导致激烈的辩论,有时甚至引发暴力反应。法国的查理周刊袭击事件就是一个严峻的提醒,表明对宗教人物或符号进行blaspheming可能产生的后果。挑战在于找到保护言论自由与尊重他人信仰之间的平衡。一方面,个人应该有权在不怕报复的情况下表达自己的想法和意见。这一原则是民主社会的基础,鼓励开放的对话和辩论。另一方面,blaspheming的行为可能会深深伤害那些视其信仰为神圣的人。当有人嘲笑或不尊重一种宗教时,可能会在社区内造成分裂并加剧紧张局势。为了应对这一复杂问题,培养相互尊重和理解的环境至关重要。教育在这个过程中发挥着关键作用。通过教授人们不同宗教及其重要性,我们可以培养同理心,减少无意中blaspheming的可能性。此外,鼓励批判性思维使个人能够在保持对他人信仰的尊重的同时参与不同观点的讨论。总之,blaspheme的行为在历史和现代背景中都具有重要意义。随着我们继续努力解决言论自由的影响,认识到尊重对话的重要性至关重要。虽然保护自我表达的权利是必要的,但我们也必须意识到我们的言辞对他人的影响。在这两个理想之间取得平衡,对于促进一个多元信仰能够和谐共存的社会至关重要。