militarised

简明释义

英[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪzd]美[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪzd]

v. （使）军事化；（使）作战争准备；（使）适合于军事用途（militarise 的过去式及过去分词，militarise 等于 malitarize）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Some 3, 000 police and semi-militarised Carabinieri, armed with more than 300 arrest warrants, executed this week's raids.

大约3000名警察和半军事化的宪兵，携带超过300份逮捕令，执行本周的突击行动。

2.A ceasefire was eventually agreed in 1953, but a peace treaty has never been signed and the Demilitarised Zone is one of the most heavily militarised places in the world.

双方最终在1953年达成停火协议，但一直没有签订和平条约；南北朝边境地区的非军事化区是世界上军事化程度最高的地区之一。

3.Yet he continued to condemn overly militarised policies for the rest of his life.

而乔治·凯南终其余生都在谴责过度军事化的政策。

4.A ceasefire was eventually agreed in 1953, but a peace treaty has never been signed and the Demilitarised Zone is one of the most heavily militarised places in the world.

双方最终在1953年达成停火协议，但一直没有签订和平条约；南北朝边境地区的非军事化区是世界上军事化程度最高的地区之一。

5.Some of the characters in the movie have also militarised their dreamscapes, to protect themselves against the invasive dream snatchers.

电影中的某些角色还能在梦境中构筑防御，防止自己的梦境被其他捕梦者入侵。

6.The area is heavily militarised and not a place to wander around in with your trousers stuffed into your socks clutching a copy of the Real Ale Pub Guide.

这里是军事重地，并不适合你把裤管塞进袜子，手里拿着一本酒吧指南到处闲逛。

7.Space is highly militarised but for the moment nobody has placed weapons there, not openly at least.

太空已经军事化，不过迄今还没有人在那里部署武器，至少没有公开部署。

8.The region has become increasingly militarised, with troops stationed at every border.

这个地区变得越来越军事化，每个边界都有驻扎的部队。

9.The militarised response to protests raised concerns about human rights violations.

对抗议活动的军事化回应引发了对人权侵犯的担忧。

10.In a militarised environment, civilian life often becomes overshadowed by military presence.

在一个军事化的环境中，平民生活往往被军事存在所掩盖。

11.After the conflict, the government militarised the police to maintain order.

冲突之后，政府将警察军事化以维持秩序。

12.Many activists argue that a militarised society is detrimental to civil liberties.

许多活动家认为，军事化的社会对公民自由是有害的。

作文

In recent years, the concept of a militarised society has become increasingly prevalent in discussions about global politics and security. A militarised society is one where military values, norms, and institutions dominate public life and influence civilian affairs. This phenomenon can be observed in various countries, where the military plays a significant role not only in defense but also in shaping national identity and policy. One of the most striking examples of a militarised society is found in nations that have experienced prolonged conflict or war. In these contexts, the military often becomes a symbol of strength and unity, leading to its integration into everyday life. For instance, in places like Israel, military service is mandatory for citizens, creating a culture where the military is revered and its influence permeates various aspects of society, from education to politics.The implications of living in a militarised society are profound. On one hand, proponents argue that a strong military presence can enhance national security and deter potential threats. They believe that a militarised approach fosters discipline and order, which can be beneficial in times of crisis. However, critics highlight the dangers of such an environment, warning that it can lead to the erosion of democratic values and civil liberties. When military perspectives dominate, there is a risk that civilian voices may be marginalized, and dissent may be suppressed in the name of security.Moreover, the militarised mindset can extend beyond national borders, influencing international relations. Countries with a strong military focus may adopt aggressive foreign policies, prioritizing military solutions over diplomatic ones. This can escalate tensions and lead to conflicts, as seen in various geopolitical hotspots around the world. The arms race between nations is often fueled by a militarised mentality, where each country feels compelled to enhance its military capabilities in response to perceived threats from others.In addition to these political and social dimensions, the militarised nature of a society can also affect its economy. Defense spending often takes precedence over other critical areas such as education and healthcare. Resources that could be allocated to improve the quality of life for citizens are diverted to maintain and expand military capabilities. This creates a paradox where a nation may appear strong on the outside due to its military prowess, yet its citizens may suffer from inadequate social services and infrastructure.As we reflect on the implications of a militarised society, it is crucial to consider alternative approaches to security and governance. Emphasizing diplomacy, dialogue, and cooperation can lead to a more peaceful and stable world. Societies that prioritize human development and address the root causes of conflict tend to foster resilience and harmony among their citizens. Ultimately, while a militarised society may offer a sense of security, it is essential to balance this with respect for human rights, democratic principles, and the well-being of all individuals. As we navigate the complexities of modern geopolitics, understanding the consequences of a militarised approach will be vital in shaping a future that promotes peace rather than conflict.

近年来，军事化社会的概念在全球政治和安全讨论中变得越来越突出。军事化社会是指军事价值观、规范和制度主导公共生活并影响民事事务的社会现象。这一现象可以在多个国家观察到，在这些国家，军方不仅在国防中发挥重要作用，还在塑造国家认同和政策方面产生影响。军事化社会最引人注目的例子之一是在经历了长期冲突或战争的国家。在这些背景下，军队往往成为力量和团结的象征，导致其融入日常生活。例如，在以色列这样的地方，服兵役是公民的义务，创造了一种文化，在这种文化中，军队受到崇敬，其影响渗透到社会的各个方面，从教育到政治。生活在军事化社会中的影响深远。一方面，支持者认为强大的军事存在可以增强国家安全，威慑潜在威胁。他们相信，军事化的方法可以培养纪律和秩序，这在危机时期是有益的。然而，批评者则强调这种环境的危险，警告说这可能导致民主价值观和公民自由的侵蚀。当军事观点占主导地位时，边缘化民声和压制异议的风险就会增加，以安全为名。此外，军事化心态还可以超越国界，影响国际关系。具有强大军事重点的国家可能会采取激进的外交政策，优先考虑军事解决方案而非外交手段。这可能加剧紧张局势，导致冲突，正如世界各地的各种地缘政治热点所示。国家之间的军备竞赛往往是由军事化心态推动的，每个国家都感到有必要增强其军事能力，以应对来自其他国家的潜在威胁。除了这些政治和社会层面外，军事化社会的特性也可能影响其经济。国防支出通常优先于教育和医疗等其他关键领域。原本可以用于改善公民生活质量的资源被转移到维持和扩展军事能力上。这造成了一个悖论，一个国家可能因其军事强大而在外表上显得强大，但其公民可能因社会服务和基础设施不足而遭受困扰。在我们反思军事化社会的影响时，考虑安全和治理的替代方法至关重要。强调外交、对话和合作可以导致一个更加和平与稳定的世界。优先考虑人类发展并解决冲突根源的社会往往能够培养公民之间的韧性与和谐。最终，尽管军事化社会可能提供一种安全感，但平衡这一点与对人权、民主原则和所有个体福祉的尊重是至关重要的。在我们应对现代地缘政治的复杂性时，理解军事化方法的后果将对塑造促进和平而非冲突的未来至关重要。