legalising

简明释义

英[ˈliːɡəlaɪzɪŋ]美[ˈliɡəˌlaɪzɪŋ]

v. 使合法化（legalise 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Catholic church has been angered by clauses which could be interpreted as legalising abortion and gay marriage.

新宪中有些条款可以被解释成允许堕胎和同行恋结婚，这也让天主教会盛怒不已。

2.The Catholic church has been angered by clauses which could be interpreted as legalising abortion and gay marriage.

新宪中有些条款可以被解释成允许堕胎和同行恋结婚，这也让天主教会盛怒不已。

3.The city council voted in favor of legalising 合法化 street vending.

市议会投票支持合法化街头小贩。

4.The government is considering legalising 合法化 marijuana for recreational use.

政府正在考虑将大麻用于娱乐目的的合法化。

5.Activists are pushing for legalising 合法化 assisted dying.

活动家们正在推动合法化安乐死。

6.Many countries are legalising 合法化 same-sex marriage to promote equality.

许多国家正在合法化同性婚姻以促进平等。

7.They are debating the impact of legalising 合法化 online gambling.

他们正在讨论合法化在线赌博的影响。

作文

In recent years, the debate surrounding the issue of drug use has intensified, with many advocating for the legalising of certain substances. The movement towards legalising drugs such as marijuana has gained significant traction in various countries and states. Proponents argue that legalising these drugs can lead to numerous benefits, including increased tax revenue, reduced crime rates, and improved public health outcomes. On the other hand, opponents express concerns about the potential dangers associated with legalising drugs, fearing it may lead to higher addiction rates and societal harm.One of the primary arguments in favor of legalising drugs is the potential for increased tax revenue. By bringing the sale of certain substances into the legal market, governments can impose taxes on these products. This revenue can then be allocated to public services, such as education and healthcare. For instance, in places where marijuana has been legalising, states have reported millions of dollars in tax revenue, which has been used to fund various community programs.Moreover, legalising drugs can significantly reduce crime rates. The illegal drug trade often leads to violent crime, as rival gangs compete for territory and control over the market. By legalising drugs, the government can regulate the market, reducing the power of criminal organizations. Additionally, law enforcement resources can be redirected towards more pressing issues, rather than focusing on non-violent drug offenses.Public health is another critical aspect of the legalising debate. Advocates argue that legalising drugs would allow for better regulation and quality control, reducing the risks associated with drug use. For example, when marijuana is legalising, consumers can be assured of its safety and dosage. Furthermore, legalising drugs can open up avenues for education and treatment, allowing individuals struggling with addiction to seek help without fear of criminal repercussions.However, the opposition raises valid concerns regarding the legalising of drugs. Critics argue that making drugs more accessible could lead to an increase in usage and addiction rates. They fear that legalising substances may send a message that drug use is acceptable, particularly to younger populations. This concern is not unfounded, as studies have shown that increased availability often correlates with higher usage rates.Another argument against legalising drugs centers around the potential societal impact. Opponents suggest that legalising drugs could lead to a normalization of substance use, creating an environment where drug use becomes more prevalent and socially acceptable. This shift could have long-term consequences for public health and safety.In conclusion, the issue of legalising drugs is complex and multifaceted. While there are compelling arguments for legalising certain substances, including economic benefits and reduced crime, it is essential to consider the potential risks involved. Ultimately, any decision regarding legalising drugs must be approached with careful consideration of both the potential benefits and drawbacks, ensuring that public health and safety remain a top priority.

近年来，围绕毒品使用问题的辩论愈演愈烈，许多人倡导对某些物质进行合法化。推动对大麻等药物进行合法化的运动在各国和各州获得了显著的支持。支持者认为，合法化这些药物可以带来许多好处，包括增加税收收入、减少犯罪率和改善公共健康结果。另一方面，反对者对与合法化药物相关的潜在危险表示担忧，担心这可能导致更高的成瘾率和社会危害。支持合法化药物的主要论点之一是增加税收收入的潜力。通过将某些物质的销售纳入合法市场，政府可以对这些产品征税。这笔收入可以分配给公共服务，如教育和医疗。例如，在一些大麻被合法化的地方，各州报告了数百万美元的税收收入，这些资金被用于资助各种社区项目。此外，合法化药物可以显著降低犯罪率。非法毒品交易往往导致暴力犯罪，因为竞争的帮派争夺领土和市场控制权。通过合法化药物，政府可以规范市场，减少犯罪组织的权力。此外，执法资源可以重新分配到更紧迫的问题上，而不是集中在非暴力毒品犯罪上。公共健康是合法化辩论的另一个关键方面。倡导者认为，合法化药物将允许更好的监管和质量控制，降低药物使用的风险。例如，当大麻被合法化时，消费者可以确保其安全性和剂量。此外，合法化药物可以为教育和治疗开辟途径，使那些与成瘾作斗争的个人能够寻求帮助，而不必担心刑事后果。然而，反对派提出了关于合法化药物的有效担忧。批评者认为，使药物更容易获取可能导致使用和成瘾率的增加。他们担心，合法化物质可能会向年轻人传达药物使用是可以接受的信息。这一担忧并非没有根据，因为研究表明，增加可获得性通常与更高的使用率相关。另一个反对合法化药物的论点围绕潜在的社会影响展开。反对者认为，合法化药物可能导致物质使用的正常化，创造一个药物使用变得更加普遍和社会可接受的环境。这种转变可能对公共健康和安全产生长期影响。总之，合法化药物的问题复杂而多面。虽然对某些物质进行合法化有令人信服的理由，包括经济利益和减少犯罪，但考虑到潜在的风险至关重要。最终，关于合法化药物的任何决定都必须谨慎处理，充分考虑潜在的好处和缺点，确保公共健康和安全仍然是首要任务。