squabble

简明释义

英[ˈskwɒb(ə)l]美[ˈskwɑːbl]

v. （为琐事）发生口角，大声争吵

n. 争吵，口角

复 数 s q u a b b l e s

第 三 人 称 单 数 s q u a b b l e s

现 在 分 词 s q u a b b l i n g

过 去 式 s q u a b b l e d

过 去 分 词 s q u a b b l e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Babbitt did not often squabble with his employees.

巴比特不常和雇员争吵。

2.I hate to squabble with my wife about money.

我厌恶为钱事兴太太争吵。

3.I hate to squabble with my wife about [over] money.

我厌恶为钱的事与太太争吵。

4.At seven we were awakened, and rushed forth to squabble over the water in the bathroom, and bolt our ration of bread and tea.

早上七点钟，我们奉命起床，然后冲进浴室争先洗脸，然后胡乱吞下自己的那份面包和茶。

5.To engage in a petty, bad - tempered quarrel; squabble.

发生口角： 因坏脾气引起的小的争吵； 为琐事争吵。

6.This is no mere squabble. The mobile revolution may be the biggest wave ever to hit the world of computing.

这不仅仅是一次小小的口角之争，移动通信的变革将是对计算机世界有史以来的最大的一波打击。

7.The children began to squabble 争吵 over who would get the last cookie.

孩子们开始为谁能得到最后一个饼干而squabble。

8.During the meeting, two team members started to squabble 争吵 about project details.

在会议上，两个团队成员开始就项目细节<squabble>争吵squabble>。

9.Their squabble 争吵 about the best movie turned into a heated debate.

他们关于最佳电影的<squabble>争吵squabble>变成了一场激烈的辩论。

10.The neighbors had a squabble 争吵 over the property line.

邻居们因为地界问题发生了<squabble>争吵squabble>。

11.It's not worth it to squabble 争吵 over trivial matters.

为了琐事<squabble>争吵squabble>是不值得的。

作文

In any community, disagreements are inevitable. People come from different backgrounds, hold varying beliefs, and have unique perspectives. However, the nature of these disagreements can vary significantly. Some may lead to constructive discussions, while others might devolve into petty arguments or a squabble (争吵). A squabble often refers to a minor quarrel or argument, typically over trivial matters. It is essential to understand how such disputes can affect relationships and community dynamics.Take, for instance, a neighborhood association meeting. Residents gather to discuss community issues, ranging from park maintenance to noise complaints. During these meetings, it is common for members to express their opinions passionately. While healthy debates can foster collaboration and improvement, they can also escalate into a squabble if individuals focus more on winning the argument than finding a solution. Imagine two neighbors, Alice and Bob, who have differing views on adding a new playground in the park. Alice believes that the playground would benefit children in the area, while Bob argues that it would attract noise and traffic, disrupting the peaceful environment. Initially, their discussion might be civil, but as they present their points, they begin to interrupt each other and raise their voices. What started as a reasonable debate quickly turns into a squabble, with both parties becoming more concerned about defending their positions rather than listening to each other.The consequences of such a squabble can be detrimental. Other residents may feel uncomfortable, and the original purpose of the meeting—improving the community—could be overshadowed by this minor conflict. It can lead to divisions within the neighborhood, where people take sides, further complicating future discussions. This scenario exemplifies how a simple disagreement can escalate into a larger issue if not managed properly.To avoid falling into the trap of a squabble, it is crucial for individuals to practice effective communication skills. Active listening is one of the most important strategies. When Alice and Bob engage in their discussion, if they both made an effort to listen to each other's concerns without interrupting, they could find common ground. Perhaps they could agree on a compromise, such as designing the playground to minimize noise or scheduling quiet hours for the neighborhood. Moreover, using 'I' statements instead of 'you' statements can help prevent defensiveness. Instead of saying, "You always want to make noise in our park," Alice could say, "I feel concerned about the noise levels when children play in the park." This approach reduces the chances of sparking a squabble and encourages a more open dialogue.In conclusion, while squabbles are a natural part of human interaction, they do not have to define our relationships or communities. By focusing on effective communication, active listening, and empathy, we can transform potential conflicts into opportunities for growth and understanding. Ultimately, the goal should be to work together for the betterment of our communities, rather than allowing minor disagreements to escalate into unnecessary squabbles (争吵).

在任何社区中，分歧是不可避免的。人们来自不同的背景，持有不同的信念，并拥有独特的观点。然而，这些分歧的性质可能会有很大不同。有些可能导致建设性的讨论，而其他则可能退化为琐碎的争吵或squabble（争吵）。squabble通常指的是小争吵或争论，通常是关于微不足道的事情。理解这些争端如何影响关系和社区动态是至关重要的。以邻里协会会议为例。居民们聚集在一起讨论社区问题，从公园维护到噪音投诉。在这些会议上，成员们通常会热情地表达自己的意见。虽然健康的辩论可以促进合作和改善，但如果个人更关注赢得争论而不是寻找解决方案，它们也可能升级为squabble。想象一下两个邻居，爱丽丝和鲍勃，他们对在公园增设一个新游乐场有不同的看法。爱丽丝认为游乐场将使该地区的儿童受益，而鲍勃则认为这会吸引噪音和交通，破坏宁静的环境。起初，他们的讨论可能是文明的，但随着他们提出各自的观点，他们开始打断对方并提高声音。最初合理的辩论迅速演变成一场squabble，双方都更加关注捍卫自己的立场，而不是倾听对方。这样的squabble的后果可能是有害的。其他居民可能会感到不适，而会议的原始目的——改善社区——可能被这一小冲突所掩盖。这可能导致邻里之间的分裂，人们站队，进一步复杂化未来的讨论。这个场景例证了简单的分歧如何在管理不当的情况下升级为更大的问题。为了避免陷入squabble的陷阱，个人练习有效的沟通技巧至关重要。积极倾听是最重要的策略之一。当爱丽丝和鲍勃进行讨论时，如果他们都努力在不打断的情况下倾听对方的担忧，他们就能找到共同点。也许他们可以就游乐场的设计达成妥协，以减少噪音，或安排社区的安静时间。此外，使用“我”语句而不是“你”语句可以帮助防止防御心态。爱丽丝可以说：“我对孩子们在公园玩耍时的噪音水平感到担忧”，而不是说：“你总是想让我们的公园变得嘈杂。”这种方法减少了引发squabble的机会，并鼓励更开放的对话。总之，虽然squabbles是人际互动的自然组成部分，但它们不必定义我们的关系或社区。通过专注于有效的沟通、积极倾听和同理心，我们可以将潜在的冲突转变为成长和理解的机会。最终，目标应该是共同努力改善我们的社区，而不是让小分歧升级为不必要的squabbles（争吵）。