legalise

简明释义

英[ˈliːɡəˌlaɪz]美[ˈliːɡəˌlaɪz]

vt. 使合法化（等于 legalize）

第 三 人 称 单 数 l e g a l i s e s

现 在 分 词 l e g a l i s i n g

过 去 式 l e g a l i s e d

过 去 分 词 l e g a l i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Philip Fearnside of the National Institute of Amazon Research said the amnesty would "legalise the illegal".

亚马逊国家研究所的Philip Fearnside说，特赦将“使非法行为得到承认”。

2.That looked like an attempt to legalise the murder of the few doctors who provide abortions there, and the bill was shelved after heavy criticism.

这一建议似乎要将谋杀(为别人做堕胎手术的)医生合法化，但该法案随即遭到非议，只能搁置下来。

3.Chile was the last country to legalise divorce in 2004 after overwhelming public pressure.

智利2004年迫于公众压力成为最后一个将离婚合法化的国家。

4.One way of interpreting the changes is that rather than creating new opportunities, they merely legalise what was already a widespread informal economy of clandestine private enterprise.

解释这种变化的原因，与其说是创造了一种新的机会，不如说他们只是将已经广泛存在、非正式的隐秘的私企经济合法化而已。

5.Five years after the Netherlands became the first country to legalise gay marriage, it is still not clear whether the global battle is being won or lost.

五年前，荷兰成为首个将同性婚姻合法化的国家；五年后，争取同性婚姻合法化的全球斗争的成败态势仍然并不明朗。

6.Iowa and Vermont became the latest American states to legalise gay marriage.

爱荷华州及佛蒙特州正为美国最新两个同性婚姻合法化的州。

7.In New England, proponents are hoping to legalise gay marriage in all six states by 2012.

在新英格兰地区[1]，支持者们希望在2012年前，6个州都能实现同性婚姻的合法化。

8.Some countries are beginning to legalise 合法化 euthanasia under strict regulations.

一些国家开始在严格的规定下合法化安乐死。

9.After years of debate, the city council voted to legalise 合法化 street vending.

经过多年的辩论，市议会投票决定合法化街头小贩。

10.The government decided to legalise 合法化 cannabis for medical use.

政府决定将大麻用于医疗目的进行合法化。

11.The campaign aims to legalise 合法化 online gambling.

该运动旨在合法化在线赌博。

12.Many activists are working hard to legalise 合法化 same-sex marriage in their country.

许多活动家正在努力在他们的国家中合法化同性婚姻。

作文

In recent years, the debate over whether to legalise (合法化) certain substances has gained significant traction across various countries. This discussion is not limited to the realm of recreational drugs but also extends to issues such as same-sex marriage and euthanasia. The push to legalise (合法化) these matters often stems from a desire for individual freedom and personal choice. Advocates argue that by legalise (合法化) these practices, society can better regulate them and reduce the negative impact associated with their prohibition.One of the most prominent examples of this debate is the movement to legalise (合法化) cannabis. Several states in the United States have already taken steps to legalise (合法化) its use for both medical and recreational purposes. Proponents of this change point out that legalising (合法化) cannabis can lead to increased tax revenues, decreased criminal justice costs, and improved public health outcomes. They argue that by regulating the sale and use of cannabis, governments can ensure safer products and reduce the risks associated with black market transactions.On the other hand, opponents of legalising (合法化) cannabis express concerns about the potential increase in usage and the implications for public health and safety. They fear that legalising (合法化) such substances may send the wrong message to young people and could result in higher rates of addiction and abuse. This highlights the complex nature of the issue, where the benefits of legalising (合法化) a substance must be weighed against the possible societal costs.The conversation surrounding the legalisation (合法化) of same-sex marriage provides another perspective on this issue. For many years, same-sex couples fought for the right to marry, arguing that legalising (合法化) their unions was a matter of basic human rights and equality. In 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalising (合法化) same-sex marriage nationwide, a landmark decision that was celebrated by many as a victory for civil rights. This case illustrates how legalising (合法化) an issue can signify societal progress and acceptance, paving the way for further advancements in equality.Similarly, the topic of euthanasia raises ethical questions about the right to die with dignity. Advocates for legalising (合法化) euthanasia argue that individuals should have the autonomy to choose when and how to end their suffering, particularly in cases of terminal illness. By legalising (合法化) euthanasia, societies can create frameworks that ensure the process is conducted ethically and with proper safeguards in place. However, critics warn that legalising (合法化) euthanasia could lead to slippery slopes, where vulnerable populations might feel pressured to end their lives prematurely.In conclusion, the act of legalising (合法化) various practices is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of both the benefits and drawbacks. Whether it is cannabis, same-sex marriage, or euthanasia, each case presents unique challenges and opportunities. As society continues to evolve, the dialogue surrounding legalisation (合法化) will likely persist, reflecting changing values and beliefs. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance that respects individual freedoms while ensuring the welfare of the community as a whole.

近年来，关于是否要对某些物质进行合法化的辩论在各国之间获得了显著的关注。这一讨论不仅限于娱乐性毒品的领域，还扩展到诸如同性婚姻和安乐死等问题。推动合法化这些事务的原因往往源于对个人自由和选择权的渴望。倡导者认为，通过合法化这些做法，社会能够更好地监管它们，并减少与禁止相关的负面影响。其中一个最突出的例子是对大麻进行合法化的运动。美国的几个州已经采取措施对其进行合法化，无论是用于医疗还是娱乐目的。支持这一变化的人指出，合法化大麻可以带来更多的税收，减少刑事司法成本，并改善公共健康结果。他们认为，通过监管大麻的销售和使用，政府可以确保产品更安全，并降低黑市交易带来的风险。另一方面，反对合法化大麻的人则对使用率可能增加及其对公共健康和安全的影响表示担忧。他们担心，合法化这样的物质可能会向年轻人传达错误的信息，并可能导致更高的成瘾和滥用率。这凸显了这个问题的复杂性，在这里，合法化某种物质的好处必须与可能的社会成本进行权衡。围绕同性婚姻的合法化的对话提供了这个问题的另一个视角。多年来，同性伴侣为结婚权而斗争，认为合法化他们的结合是基本人权和平等的问题。2015年，美国最高法院裁定全国合法化同性婚姻，这一里程碑式的决定被许多人视为民权的胜利。这个案例说明了合法化一个问题可以标志着社会进步和接受，为进一步的平等进展铺平道路。同样，安乐死的话题也引发了关于尊严死去权利的伦理问题。支持合法化安乐死的人认为，个人应该有权选择何时以及如何结束自己的痛苦，特别是在面对绝症时。通过合法化安乐死，社会可以创建框架，以确保这一过程在伦理上进行，并有适当的保障措施。然而，批评者警告说，合法化安乐死可能会导致滑坡效应，脆弱群体可能会感到被迫提前结束生命。总之，合法化各种实践的行为是一个多方面的问题，需要仔细考虑其利弊。无论是大麻、同性婚姻还是安乐死，每个案例都呈现出独特的挑战和机遇。随着社会的不断发展，围绕合法化的对话可能会持续存在，反映出不断变化的价值观和信念。最终，目标应该是找到一种既尊重个人自由，又确保整个社区福祉的平衡。