jury anchor

简明释义

临时锚

英英释义

例句

1.The jury anchor 陪审团锚点 set by the opening statement influenced the jury's perception throughout the trial.

开场陈述设定的陪审团锚点 jury anchor 影响了陪审团在整个审判过程中的看法。

2.The defense attorney aimed to create doubt around the jury anchor 陪审团锚点 established by the witnesses.

辩护律师旨在对证人建立的陪审团锚点 jury anchor 产生怀疑。

3.The lawyer explained that the jury anchor 陪审团锚点 is crucial for guiding the jury's decision-making process.

律师解释说，陪审团锚点 jury anchor 对于引导陪审团的决策过程至关重要。

4.During the trial, the prosecution used a strong jury anchor 陪审团锚点 to emphasize the importance of the evidence presented.

在审判期间，控方使用了一个强有力的陪审团锚点 jury anchor 来强调所呈现证据的重要性。

5.In her closing arguments, she referred back to the jury anchor 陪审团锚点 to reinforce her point.

在她的结案陈词中，她回到陪审团锚点 jury anchor 来加强她的观点。

作文

In the realm of legal proceedings, the concept of a jury anchor plays a crucial role in ensuring that the jury remains focused and grounded in their decision-making process. A jury anchor refers to a specific piece of evidence, a testimony, or even a guiding principle that serves to stabilize the jurors' thoughts and deliberations. This term is particularly significant because it highlights the importance of maintaining clarity and direction amidst the complexities of a trial. When jurors are presented with an overwhelming amount of information, they can easily become confused or swayed by emotional appeals. The presence of a jury anchor helps to mitigate this risk by providing a reference point that jurors can return to when they feel lost in the details. For instance, during a murder trial, the prosecution may present compelling forensic evidence as a jury anchor. This piece of evidence could be a DNA match that links the defendant to the crime scene. By focusing on this concrete fact, jurors can better evaluate the surrounding testimonies and arguments without losing sight of the key elements of the case.Furthermore, a jury anchor can also be a narrative or theme that resonates with the jurors' values and beliefs. In many cases, attorneys will craft their arguments around a central theme that serves as a jury anchor. For example, in a civil rights case, the attorney might emphasize themes of justice and equality, appealing to the jurors' sense of morality. This thematic jury anchor not only guides the jurors' understanding of the case but also fosters a sense of shared purpose among them. The effectiveness of a jury anchor is largely dependent on how well it is integrated into the overall presentation of the case. Attorneys must skillfully introduce and reinforce these anchors throughout the trial. This can be achieved through strategic questioning, compelling storytelling, and the careful selection of evidence. A well-placed jury anchor can make the difference between a verdict of guilty or not guilty, as it shapes the jurors' perceptions and influences their ultimate decision. In conclusion, the concept of a jury anchor is vital in the judicial process. It serves as a stabilizing force for jurors, helping them navigate the complexities of a trial. By providing a clear reference point, whether it be a piece of evidence or a central theme, a jury anchor aids jurors in making informed decisions based on facts rather than emotions. As such, understanding and effectively utilizing jury anchors can significantly enhance the presentation of a case and contribute to the pursuit of justice. Ultimately, the role of a jury anchor extends beyond the courtroom, as it symbolizes the importance of clarity and focus in any decision-making process. Whether in legal matters or everyday life, having a reliable anchor can guide individuals toward sound judgments and outcomes.

在法律程序中，“陪审团锚”这一概念在确保陪审团在决策过程中保持专注和稳定方面发挥着至关重要的作用。“陪审团锚”指的是特定的证据、证词，甚至是指导原则，这些都可以作为稳定陪审员思考和讨论的参考点。这个术语尤其重要，因为它突显了在审判复杂性中保持清晰和方向感的重要性。当陪审员面临大量信息时，他们很容易感到困惑或被情感诉求所左右。“陪审团锚”的存在有助于减轻这种风险，因为它提供了一个陪审员在感到迷失时可以返回的参考点。例如，在一起谋杀案审判中，控方可能会将令人信服的法医证据作为“陪审团锚”。这件证据可能是将被告与犯罪现场联系起来的DNA匹配。通过关注这一具体事实，陪审员可以更好地评估周围的证词和论点，而不至于在案件的关键要素中迷失。此外，“陪审团锚”也可以是与陪审员的价值观和信念产生共鸣的叙述或主题。在许多情况下，律师会围绕一个中心主题构建他们的论点，该主题充当“陪审团锚”。例如，在一起民权案件中，律师可能会强调正义和平等的主题，呼应陪审员的道德感。这种主题性的“陪审团锚”不仅引导陪审员对案件的理解，还促进了陪审员之间的共同目标感。“陪审团锚”的有效性在于其在案件整体呈现中的整合程度。律师必须巧妙地在整个审判过程中介绍和强化这些锚。这可以通过战略性提问、引人入胜的讲故事以及证据的仔细选择来实现。一个恰到好处的“陪审团锚”可能会在有罪或无罪的裁决之间产生差异，因为它塑造了陪审员的认知并影响了他们的最终决定。总之，“陪审团锚”的概念在司法过程中至关重要。它作为陪审员的稳定力量，帮助他们驾驭审判的复杂性。通过提供明确的参考点，无论是证据还是中心主题，“陪审团锚”帮助陪审员基于事实而非情感做出明智的决定。因此，理解和有效利用“陪审团锚”可以显著提升案件的呈现，并有助于追求正义。最终，“陪审团锚”的角色超越了法庭，因为它象征着在任何决策过程中清晰和专注的重要性。无论是在法律事务中还是日常生活中，拥有一个可靠的锚都可以引导个人朝着合理的判断和结果迈进。