junket

简明释义

英[ˈdʒʌŋkɪt]美[ˈdʒʌŋkɪt]

n. 野餐；游览

vi. 野餐；去郊游

复 数 j u n k e t s

第 三 人 称 单 数 j u n k e t s

现 在 分 词 j u n k e t i n g

过 去 式 j u n k e t e d

过 去 分 词 j u n k e t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Do you wonder how you could ever afford such a junket?

你是不是想知道怎么样你才能也来次这样的旅游呢？

2.Hear sound coming from the engine of a car of junket exception of driver, and he immediately pluck over to retard, but in the end anything works.

驾驶员听到从汽伡引擎里传出异常的声音，于是他马上靠边停伡检查，但是最终一切正常。

3.Politicians are always off on a junket.

政客们总乐于公费旅游。

4.Shevchenko was in Moscow yesterday, for some publicity junket .

昨天舍瓦在莫斯科参与一些公共活动。

5.Great business relationships are forged on golf courses, fine restaurants, and the occasional junket.

伟大的商业关系都是构建在高尔夫球场、高档餐馆，以及偶尔的旅游考察上。

6.Last week's stateside press junket for the new film was scotched after national journalists caught their planes, but for reasons unknown Godard missed his.

上周新片在美国本土召开了一个媒体野餐会，全国记者赶了飞机飞来，却发现戈达尔无缘无故没到场。

7.The travel agency offers a junket package that includes flights and accommodations.

这家旅行社提供的公款旅游套餐包括航班和住宿。

8.The company organized a junket to Las Vegas for its top salespeople.

公司为其顶尖销售人员组织了一次公款旅游前往拉斯维加斯。

9.They planned a junket to promote their new product line.

他们计划一次公款旅游来推广他们的新产品系列。

10.She enjoyed a luxurious junket in Europe last summer.

她去年夏天在欧洲享受了一次奢华的公款旅游。

11.The politician faced criticism for taking a junket funded by lobbyists.

这位政治家因接受游说者资助的公款旅游而受到批评。

作文

In the modern world, the concept of a junket has evolved significantly. Originally, this term referred to a pleasure trip or excursion, often funded by someone else, such as a company or government. Today, it can carry a more negative connotation, suggesting that such trips are extravagant and unnecessary. Despite its mixed reputation, the idea of a junket remains prevalent in various sectors, particularly in politics and business. Politicians often go on junkets to exotic locations under the guise of attending conferences or meetings, raising questions about the appropriateness of using taxpayer money for such endeavors.The allure of a junket is undeniable. For many, it represents an opportunity to escape the daily grind and experience new cultures, cuisines, and environments. However, the ethical implications cannot be ignored. When public funds are used to finance these trips, it becomes essential to scrutinize their purpose and outcomes. Are they genuinely beneficial for the constituents, or are they merely a way for officials to enjoy luxury at the expense of the public?In the corporate world, junkets can serve as a tool for networking and relationship building. Companies may organize lavish events or retreats for clients and stakeholders, hoping to foster goodwill and loyalty. While these gatherings can result in fruitful partnerships, they also risk being perceived as wasteful spending. The line between legitimate business expenses and indulgent junkets can often blur, leading to potential backlash from shareholders and the public.Moreover, the rise of social media has contributed to the scrutiny of junkets. With everyone sharing their experiences online, any perceived extravagance can quickly become a topic of discussion and criticism. This increased visibility has led many organizations to reevaluate their approach to hosting junkets, ensuring that they are not only enjoyable but also justifiable.In conclusion, while the idea of a junket may evoke images of luxury and leisure, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of such trips. Whether in politics or business, the ethical considerations surrounding junkets must be addressed. Striking a balance between enjoying the benefits of travel and maintaining accountability to the public or stakeholders is vital. Ultimately, a well-planned junket can provide valuable experiences, but it should always be approached with transparency and integrity. Only then can we truly appreciate the value of these excursions without falling into the trap of excess and irresponsibility.

在现代社会，‘junket’这一概念发生了显著变化。最初，这个词指的是一次由他人资助的游乐旅行或短途旅行，如公司或政府。如今，它可能带有更负面的含义，暗示这样的旅行奢华且不必要。尽管其声誉不一，‘junket’的观念在各个领域依然普遍存在，尤其是在政治和商业中。政治家们常常以参加会议或活动的名义，前往异国他乡进行‘junket’，这引发了关于使用纳税人资金进行此类活动的适当性的问题。‘junket’的吸引力是不可否认的。对许多人来说，它代表着逃离日常琐事，体验新文化、美食和环境的机会。然而，伦理影响不容忽视。当公共资金被用来资助这些旅行时，审视其目的和结果变得至关重要。这些旅行真的对选民有益，还是仅仅是官员们在公众支出下享受奢华的方式？在企业界，‘junkets’可以作为建立网络和关系的工具。公司可能会为客户和利益相关者组织奢华的活动或度假，希望培养良好的关系和忠诚度。虽然这些聚会可能导致富有成效的合作，但它们也有被视为浪费开支的风险。合法商业开支与奢侈‘junkets’之间的界限往往模糊，可能导致股东和公众的潜在反弹。此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了对‘junkets’的审查。随着每个人在网上分享他们的经历，任何被认为奢华的行为都可能迅速成为讨论和批评的话题。这种可见性的增加使许多组织重新评估举办‘junkets’的方式，确保它们不仅令人愉悦，而且也是合理的。总之，尽管‘junket’的概念可能唤起奢华和休闲的形象，但考虑这些旅行的更广泛影响至关重要。无论是在政治还是商业中，围绕‘junkets’的伦理考量必须得到解决。在享受旅行的好处与对公众或利益相关者保持问责之间取得平衡是至关重要的。最终，一个精心策划的‘junket’可以提供宝贵的体验，但它应该始终以透明度和诚信为基础。只有这样，我们才能真正欣赏这些短途旅行的价值，而不陷入过度和不负责任的陷阱。