blameworthiness

简明释义

英[ˈbleɪmˌwɜːθɪnəs]美[ˈbleɪmˌwɜrθənəs]

可责备性

应受责备性

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The foundation of bearing joint and several liability by possible tortfeasors is no longer joint-negligence but the blameworthiness of subjective danger.

共同危险行为人承担连带责任的基础不再是共同过失，而是客观危险的可责难性。

2.The foundation of bearing joint and several liability by possible tortfeasors is no longer joint-negligence but the blameworthiness of subjective danger.

共同危险行为人承担连带责任的基础不再是共同过失，而是客观危险的可责难性。

3.The teacher assessed the students' blameworthiness 可责备性 for the group project failure.

老师评估了学生们在小组项目失败中的可责备性。

4.The judge considered the defendant's blameworthiness 可责备性 when determining the sentence.

法官在决定判刑时考虑了被告的可责备性。

5.The committee evaluated the blameworthiness 可责备性 of the officials involved in the scandal.

委员会评估了参与丑闻的官员的可责备性。

6.In a debate about corporate ethics, we discussed the blameworthiness 可责备性 of companies that harm the environment.

在关于企业伦理的辩论中，我们讨论了那些对环境造成伤害的公司的可责备性。

7.In criminal law, blameworthiness 可责备性 is a key factor in establishing guilt.

在刑法中，可责备性是确定罪责的关键因素。

作文

In the realm of ethics and morality, the concept of blameworthiness plays a crucial role in determining how individuals are held accountable for their actions. Blameworthiness refers to the degree to which a person can be considered deserving of blame for a particular action or decision. This idea is essential in various fields, including law, philosophy, and everyday interpersonal relationships. Understanding blameworthiness helps us navigate complex moral landscapes and make informed judgments about others' behavior.To illustrate the significance of blameworthiness, consider a scenario where a person accidentally causes a car accident due to a sudden medical emergency. In this case, the individual may not be deemed highly blameworthy because their actions were not intentional, nor could they have foreseen the consequences. On the other hand, if a person drives under the influence of alcohol and causes an accident, their level of blameworthiness increases significantly. Here, the intention and knowledge of wrongdoing play a vital role in assessing their culpability.The evaluation of blameworthiness often involves examining several factors, such as intent, knowledge, and circumstances surrounding the action. For instance, a person who commits a crime out of desperation might be viewed with more empathy than someone who commits the same crime purely for personal gain. This highlights the importance of context when assessing blameworthiness. It raises questions about fairness and justice, prompting us to consider whether all individuals should be treated equally under the law regardless of their motivations or circumstances.Philosophers have long debated the nature of blameworthiness and its implications for moral responsibility. Some argue that individuals should be held accountable only for actions taken with full awareness and intent, while others believe that societal norms and expectations should also factor into assessments of blameworthiness. This debate becomes particularly relevant in discussions about systemic issues, such as poverty and inequality, where individuals may find themselves in situations that limit their choices and opportunities.In everyday life, our understanding of blameworthiness affects how we interact with others. When conflicts arise, we often seek to determine who is at fault and to what extent. This process can lead to feelings of resentment or forgiveness, depending on our perceptions of blameworthiness. For example, if a friend forgets your birthday, you might consider their blameworthiness based on their past behavior and the context of their forgetfulness. If they have consistently shown care and consideration, you may be more inclined to forgive them than if this incident were part of a pattern of neglect.Ultimately, the concept of blameworthiness serves as a reminder of our shared humanity. We all make mistakes, and understanding the nuances of blameworthiness encourages compassion and empathy. By recognizing that people are often shaped by their circumstances and intentions, we can foster more constructive dialogues and promote healing rather than division. In a world that frequently seeks to assign blame, embracing a more nuanced view of blameworthiness can lead to greater understanding and cooperation among individuals and communities.In conclusion, blameworthiness is a multifaceted concept that influences our moral judgments and interpersonal relationships. By examining the factors that contribute to blameworthiness, we can develop a deeper understanding of accountability and forgiveness. This understanding not only enriches our ethical perspectives but also enhances our ability to engage with others compassionately and thoughtfully.

在伦理和道德的领域中，blameworthiness（可责备性）这一概念在确定个人对其行为的责任方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Blameworthiness指的是一个人因特定行为或决定而被认为应受到指责的程度。这个理念在法律、哲学和日常人际关系等多个领域都至关重要。理解blameworthiness有助于我们在复杂的道德环境中导航，并对他人的行为做出明智的判断。为了说明blameworthiness的重要性，考虑一个场景：一个人因突发医疗紧急情况而意外造成了一起车祸。在这种情况下，由于该个人的行为并非故意，也无法预见后果，他们可能不会被认为具有高度的blameworthiness。另一方面，如果一个人在酒后驾车并造成事故，他们的blameworthiness水平显著增加。在这里，意图和对错误行为的认知在评估其责任时起着至关重要的作用。对blameworthiness的评估通常涉及审查几个因素，例如意图、知识和行为周围的情况。例如，一个因绝望而犯罪的人可能会比一个出于个人利益而犯罪的人更容易获得同情。这突显了在评估blameworthiness时上下文的重要性。它引发了关于公平和正义的问题，促使我们思考是否所有个人都应在法律下平等对待，而不考虑他们的动机或情况。哲学家们长期以来一直在辩论blameworthiness的本质及其对道德责任的影响。一些人认为，只有在充分意识到和有意图的情况下，个人才应被追究责任，而另一些人则认为，社会规范和期望也应纳入对blameworthiness的评估。这一辩论在讨论系统性问题（如贫困和不平等）时变得尤为相关，因为个人可能会发现自己处于限制选择和机会的境地。在日常生活中，我们对blameworthiness的理解影响着我们与他人的互动。当冲突发生时，我们常常试图确定谁是错的，程度如何。这个过程可能导致怨恨或宽恕，具体取决于我们对blameworthiness的看法。例如，如果一个朋友忘记了你的生日，你可能会根据他们的过去行为和忘记的背景来考虑他们的blameworthiness。如果他们一贯表现出关心和体贴，你可能会更倾向于原谅他们，而不是如果这次事件是忽视模式的一部分。最终，blameworthiness这一概念提醒我们共同的人性。我们都会犯错误，理解blameworthiness的细微差别鼓励了同情和共鸣。通过认识到人们往往受到其环境和意图的影响，我们可以促进更具建设性的对话，推动愈合而非分裂。在一个经常寻求归咎的世界中，接受对blameworthiness的更加细致的看法，可以在个人和社区之间带来更大的理解与合作。总之，blameworthiness是一个多面的概念，影响着我们的道德判断和人际关系。通过审视导致blameworthiness的因素，我们可以更深入地理解责任和宽恕。这种理解不仅丰富了我们的伦理视角，还增强了我们与他人以同情和深思熟虑的方式互动的能力。