coeducational

简明释义

英[ˌkəʊˌɛdʒʊˈkeɪʃənl]美[ˌkoʊˌɛdʒʊˈkeɪʃənl]

adj. 男女合校的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Since then, more and more Chinese university became coeducational.

此后，越来越多的中国大学实行了男女同校。

2.All girls schools tend to be smaller than coeducational schools, which means teachers will be able to tailor the materials to girls, students, personal learning styles and interest.

所有的女校都比男女同校的学校规模小，这意味着老师可以根据性别、学生的个性、不同的学习风格和兴趣定制教材。

3.Girls studying in a single-sex setting also earn higher scores on their College Board Advanced Placement exams than girls who study in coeducational settings.

与在男女同校环境中学习的女孩相比，在单性别环境中学习的女孩在他们的大学理事会预修课程考试中的分数也更高。

4.Because it is the monarch who launched the country's first coeducational university.

因为正是这位君主开办了该国第一所男女同校的大学。

5.From the outset they made some untraditional choices: the university would be coeducational, in a time when most were all-male;

从一开始，他们提出了一些非传统选择：高校将男女同校，在当时大多数都是男性；

6.In a coeducational school, everything is thought into its proper place.

然而在一所男女同校的学校里，一切都有其合理的位置。

7.She attended a coeducational 男女同校的 university where she made many friends.

她就读于一所男女同校的大学，在那里交了很多朋友。

8.The debate team at the coeducational 男女同校的 high school is very competitive.

这所男女同校的高中的辩论队非常有竞争力。

9.The coeducational 男女同校的 setting encourages collaboration between genders.

这种男女同校的环境鼓励性别之间的合作。

10.The school offers a variety of programs in a coeducational 男女同校的 environment.

这所学校在一个男女同校的环境中提供多种课程。

11.Many parents prefer coeducational 男女同校的 institutions for their children.

许多家长为他们的孩子选择男女同校的机构。

作文

The concept of coeducational education has been a topic of discussion for many years. In a coeducational system, boys and girls are educated together in the same environment. This approach to education has its roots in the belief that learning alongside peers of the opposite gender can foster mutual respect, understanding, and collaboration. Many proponents argue that coeducational institutions prepare students for real-world experiences where they must interact with individuals of all genders. One of the primary advantages of coeducational schools is the promotion of social skills. Students in coeducational settings often develop better communication skills as they learn to express themselves in mixed-gender groups. This interaction helps break down gender stereotypes and encourages students to appreciate diverse perspectives. For instance, group projects in a coeducational classroom can lead to innovative solutions as students combine their different viewpoints. Moreover, coeducational environments can enhance emotional intelligence among students. By working together, boys and girls learn to navigate social dynamics and develop empathy for each other’s experiences. This aspect is crucial as it prepares them for future workplaces where teamwork is essential. In a coeducational setting, students can engage in discussions about gender issues, which fosters a culture of respect and equality. However, there are arguments against coeducational schooling. Critics suggest that in certain subjects, especially those like mathematics and science, boys and girls may perform differently due to societal pressures and expectations. They argue that single-gender schools could provide an environment where students feel less distracted by the opposite sex and can focus more on academics. Nevertheless, studies have shown that the differences in academic performance between coeducational and single-gender schools are minimal. Another point of contention is the impact of coeducational schooling on personal relationships. Some believe that being in a coeducational environment may lead to distractions related to dating and socializing, which could detract from academic performance. However, others argue that learning to balance personal relationships with academic responsibilities is a vital life skill. In conclusion, the coeducational model of education offers numerous benefits that extend beyond academics. While there are valid concerns regarding its effectiveness, the ability to learn in a diverse environment prepares students for the complexities of modern society. Ultimately, whether in a coeducational or single-gender setting, the goal should be to create an inclusive atmosphere where all students can thrive. It is essential to recognize that both systems have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice should depend on the individual needs of the students. As society continues to evolve, so too will our understanding of the most effective educational approaches, but the value of coeducational learning remains significant in fostering well-rounded individuals.

‘男女同校’教育的概念多年来一直是讨论的主题。在一个‘男女同校’的体系中，男孩和女孩在同一环境中接受教育。这种教育方式根植于这样的信念：与异性同学一起学习可以促进相互尊重、理解和合作。许多支持者认为，‘男女同校’的机构能够让学生为未来的现实世界做好准备，因为他们必须与所有性别的人互动。‘男女同校’学校的主要优点之一是促进社交技能。身处‘男女同校’环境中的学生通常会培养更好的沟通能力，因为他们学习在混合性别的小组中表达自己。这种互动有助于打破性别刻板印象，并鼓励学生欣赏不同的观点。例如，在‘男女同校’课堂中的小组项目可以导致创新的解决方案，因为学生将不同的观点结合在一起。此外，‘男女同校’环境可以增强学生的情商。通过共同工作，男孩和女孩学习如何应对社会动态，并培养对彼此经历的同理心。这一点至关重要，因为它为他们未来的工作场所做好了准备，在那里团队合作至关重要。在‘男女同校’的环境中，学生可以参与关于性别问题的讨论，从而培养一种尊重和平等的文化。然而，也有人对‘男女同校’学校提出反对意见。批评者认为，在某些科目上，尤其是数学和科学，男孩和女孩可能由于社会压力和期望而表现不同。他们认为，单性别学校可以提供一个环境，让学生不受异性的干扰，更加专注于学业。然而，研究表明，‘男女同校’和单性别学校之间的学业表现差异微乎其微。另一个争论点是‘男女同校’学校对个人关系的影响。有些人认为，在‘男女同校’环境中可能会导致与约会和社交相关的干扰，这可能会影响学业表现。然而，其他人则认为，学习在个人关系和学业责任之间取得平衡是一项重要的生活技能。总之，‘男女同校’的教育模式提供了众多超越学术的好处。尽管对于其有效性存在合理的担忧，但在多元化环境中学习的能力为学生准备了应对现代社会的复杂性。最终，无论是在‘男女同校’还是单性别环境中，目标都应该是创造一个包容的氛围，让所有学生都能茁壮成长。必须认识到这两种体系都有其优缺点，选择应该取决于学生的个人需求。随着社会的不断发展，我们对最有效的教育方法的理解也将不断演变，但‘男女同校’学习的价值仍然在于培养全面发展的人才。