pussyfooter
简明释义
n. 抱骑墙态度者;禁酒主义者;观望者
英英释义
A person who is indecisive or avoids taking a firm stance on an issue. | 一个犹豫不决或避免在某个问题上采取明确立场的人。 |
单词用法
小心翼翼地处理某事 | |
不要犹豫不决 | |
谈判中的懦弱者 | |
对某个问题的犹豫不决 |
同义词
逃避的 | 他在被问及计划时总是很逃避。 | ||
不表态者 | As a fence-sitter, she never takes a strong stance on any issue. | 作为一个不表态者,她从不对任何问题采取强硬立场。 | |
不表态的 | 他不表态的回答让大家感到困惑。 | ||
优柔寡断的 | 我觉得他优柔寡断的态度令人沮丧。 |
反义词
果断的 | 她果断地决定改变自己的职业。 | ||
坚定的 | He is known for his resolute stance on environmental issues. | 他在环境问题上以坚定的立场而闻名。 | |
直率的 | 首席执行官在会议中采取了直率的方式。 |
例句
1.Don't be a ; just make a decision and stick with it!
别再做一个
;下定决心并坚持下去!2.He tends to be a real when it comes to making decisions, always avoiding confrontation.
在做决定时,他总是一个真正的
,总是避免冲突。3.The manager is such a ; he never takes a firm stand on any issue.
这个经理真是个
;他从不在任何问题上采取坚定的立场。4.She was criticized for being a during the project, as she kept changing her mind.
她因在项目中表现得像个
而受到批评,因为她总是改变主意。5.If you want to succeed in business, you can't be a about tough negotiations.
如果你想在商业上成功,就不能在艰难的谈判中成为一个
。作文
In the world of politics and decision-making, there are often individuals who prefer to avoid taking a firm stance on controversial issues. These individuals can be described as . A is someone who hesitates or evades making a clear decision, often opting for ambiguity instead of clarity. This behavior can be seen in various contexts, from corporate boardrooms to political debates, where taking a definitive position may lead to backlash or criticism.One notable example of is seen during election campaigns. Politicians often try to appeal to a broad audience by avoiding strong opinions on divisive topics such as immigration or healthcare reform. Instead of articulating a clear policy, they might give vague statements that could be interpreted in multiple ways. This tactic can help them avoid alienating potential voters, but it also raises questions about their integrity and commitment to addressing important issues.In business, may avoid making tough decisions regarding layoffs or budget cuts. They might delay necessary actions, hoping that circumstances will change or that someone else will take the initiative. This indecisiveness can lead to greater problems down the line, as unresolved issues fester and grow. Employees may become frustrated with leadership that lacks direction, ultimately affecting morale and productivity.The phenomenon of is not limited to public figures; it can manifest in everyday life as well. For instance, when friends are planning an outing, one person may refuse to suggest a specific restaurant or activity, instead saying, 'I’m fine with whatever you choose.' While this may seem polite, it can lead to indecision and frustration among the group. Everyone may end up waiting for someone else to take charge, resulting in a lack of progress.Moreover, often struggle with accountability. By not committing to a decision, they can avoid taking responsibility for the outcomes. This can create a culture of blame-shifting, where no one wants to own up to mistakes or failures because they were never fully invested in the decision-making process. In contrast, leaders who are willing to take a stand and make tough calls, even if they face criticism, tend to earn respect and trust from their peers and subordinates.In conclusion, while there may be situations where caution is warranted, consistently being a can have negative consequences. It can hinder progress, create distrust, and prevent meaningful dialogue from taking place. To foster effective communication and leadership, it is essential to embrace clarity and decisiveness. Encouraging individuals to express their opinions and take a stand can lead to more productive discussions and better outcomes, whether in politics, business, or personal relationships. Ultimately, avoiding the label of a can empower individuals to drive change and make impactful decisions that benefit everyone involved.
在政治和决策的世界中,常常有一些人倾向于避免在有争议的问题上采取明确的立场。这些人可以被描述为
。 是指那些犹豫不决或回避作出明确决定的人,他们往往选择模糊而非清晰。这种行为可以在各种环境中看到,从企业董事会到政治辩论,在这些地方,采取明确立场可能会导致反弹或批评。一个显著的例子是选举活动中的 。政治家们常常试图通过避免对移民或医疗改革等分歧话题发表强烈意见来吸引广泛的受众。与其清晰地阐述政策,他们可能会给出模糊的声明,这些声明可以有多种解释。这种策略可以帮助他们避免疏远潜在选民,但也引发了对其诚信和解决重要问题的承诺的质疑。在商业中, 可能会避免就裁员或预算削减做出艰难的决定。他们可能会推迟必要的行动,希望情况会有所改变,或者希望其他人会采取主动。这种优柔寡断可能导致更大的问题,因为未解决的问题滋生和扩大。员工可能会对缺乏方向感的领导层感到沮丧,最终影响士气和生产力。此外, 现象不仅限于公众人物;它也可以在日常生活中表现出来。例如,当朋友们计划外出时,有一个人可能拒绝建议特定的餐厅或活动,而只是说:'我对你们选择的任何东西都没意见。'虽然这似乎很礼貌,但可能导致小组中的优柔寡断和沮丧。每个人可能都在等待其他人采取主导作用,导致缺乏进展。 通常在问责方面存在困难。通过不承诺于某个决定,他们可以避免对结果负责。这可能会造成一种推卸责任的文化,在这种文化中,没有人愿意承认错误或失败,因为他们从未真正参与决策过程。相比之下,愿意坚持立场并做出艰难决定的领导者,即使面临批评,通常会赢得同事和下属的尊重和信任。总之,虽然在某些情况下谨慎是明智的,但始终作为一个 可能会产生负面后果。它可能会阻碍进展,造成不信任,并阻止有意义的对话发生。为了促进有效的沟通和领导,接受清晰和果断是至关重要的。鼓励个人表达自己的意见并采取立场,可以导致更富有成效的讨论和更好的结果,无论是在政治、商业还是个人关系中。最终,避免被贴上 的标签,可以使个人有能力推动变化并做出对所有相关人员都有益的重大决策。