scaremongers

简明释义

[ˈskeəmʌŋɡə(r)][ˈskermɑːŋɡər]

n. 散布谣言的人

英英释义

People who deliberately spread fear or panic about a particular issue.

故意传播关于某个问题的恐惧或恐慌的人。

单词用法

scaremongers in the media

媒体中的危言耸听者

political scaremongers

政治领域的危言耸听者

scaremongers spreading fear

传播恐惧的危言耸听者

to accuse someone of being a scaremonger

指责某人是危言耸听者

the tactics of scaremongers

危言耸听者的策略

scaremongers thrive on panic

危言耸听者在恐慌中生存

同义词

alarmists

危言耸听者

The alarmists predicted dire consequences if the new policy was implemented.

那些危言耸听者预测如果实施新政策将会有严重后果。

fearmongers

制造恐慌者

Fearmongers often exaggerate threats to gain attention.

制造恐慌者常常夸大威胁以获得关注。

panic spreaders

传播恐慌的人

Panic spreaders took to social media to amplify their claims.

传播恐慌的人在社交媒体上放大他们的主张。

doomsayers

末日预言者

Doomsayers have always warned about the end of the world.

末日预言者总是警告世界的终结。

反义词

optimists

乐观主义者

Optimists believe that the future will be better than the present.

乐观主义者相信未来会比现在更好。

realists

现实主义者

Realists focus on practical approaches to solve problems rather than spreading fear.

现实主义者关注解决问题的实际方法,而不是传播恐惧。

例句

1.But history shows that the scaremongers are usually wrong.

可是历史上偏偏总是那些散播恐慌的人出错。

2.The scaremongers are not always wrong. The Trojans should have listened to Cassandra. But history shows that the scaremongers are usually wrong.

散播恐慌的人不一定总是错的。特洛伊的人就本应该听取(预言家)桑德拉的预言。可是历史上偏偏总是那些散播恐慌的人出错。

3.The scaremongers are not always wrong. The Trojans should have listened to Cassandra. But history shows that the scaremongers are usually wrong.

散播恐慌的人不一定总是错的。特洛伊的人就本应该听取(预言家)桑德拉的预言。可是历史上偏偏总是那些散播恐慌的人出错。

4.Fortunately, there are fewer fools around than some of the scaremongers like to think.

幸运的是,喜欢思考的危言耸听者比傻子还是多些。

5.Even scaremongers agree Russia is no immediate threat.

甚至散布谣言的人同意,俄罗斯已经不是威胁了。

6.PEAK-oil theorists, who claim that oil supplies cannot keep rising to meet global demand, have long been dismissed as scaremongers.

那些声称石油供应不能一直增长以满足全球需求的石油顶峰理论家,长期以来一直被认为是制造恐慌的人而被排斥。

7.The land of Leibniz and Humboldt, of Goethe and Gauss, is now indulging the fantasies of cynical scaremongers.

这片诞生过莱布尼茨和洪堡、歌德和高斯的土地,现在正沉浸于危言耸听者愤世嫉俗的幻想中。

8.The scaremongers are not always wrong.

散播恐慌的人不一定总是错的。

9.Some financial analysts are labeled as scaremongers 危言耸听者 for predicting a market crash without solid evidence.

一些金融分析师因在没有确凿证据的情况下预测市场崩溃而被贴上危言耸听者的标签。

10.During the pandemic, some scaremongers 危言耸听者 spread false information about the virus to create panic.

在疫情期间,一些危言耸听者传播关于病毒的虚假信息以制造恐慌。

11.The media often portrays politicians as scaremongers 危言耸听者 when they exaggerate the threats to national security.

媒体常常将那些夸大国家安全威胁的政治家描绘成危言耸听者

12.Environmental scaremongers 危言耸听者 often highlight worst-case scenarios to push for stricter regulations.

环境危言耸听者常常强调最坏的情况以推动更严格的法规。

13.Critics argue that the government is using scaremongers 危言耸听者 tactics to justify increased surveillance.

批评者认为政府正在使用危言耸听者的策略来为增加监视辩护。

作文

In today's world, the spread of information is faster than ever, thanks to the internet and social media. However, this rapid dissemination of news also comes with its own set of challenges. One of the most significant issues we face is the presence of scaremongers (散布恐慌者), individuals or groups who spread fear and panic by exaggerating or fabricating threats. These scaremongers often exploit current events, political situations, or health crises to incite fear among the public. Their actions can lead to widespread anxiety and chaos, making it crucial for society to recognize and combat such behavior.The role of scaremongers is particularly evident during times of crisis. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous scaremongers emerged, spreading misinformation about the virus's origins, transmission, and potential treatments. Some claimed that the virus was deliberately created as a bioweapon, while others suggested that certain remedies could cure it overnight. Such unfounded claims not only misled the public but also hindered efforts to control the spread of the virus. In this case, scaremongers played a detrimental role, diverting attention from credible health advice and leading to dangerous behaviors.Moreover, scaremongers can have significant impacts on public policy and social behavior. When people are driven by fear, they may support extreme measures that infringe on personal freedoms. For instance, in response to exaggerated fears about crime rates, communities might advocate for strict law enforcement policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups. This reaction illustrates how the influence of scaremongers can lead to societal divisions and unjust practices.Education plays a vital role in combating the effects of scaremongers. By promoting critical thinking and media literacy, individuals can learn to discern credible sources from unreliable ones. Schools and communities should emphasize the importance of verifying information before sharing it, especially on social media platforms where misinformation can spread like wildfire. Encouraging healthy skepticism allows people to question the motives behind sensationalist claims and reduces the power of scaremongers.Additionally, responsible journalism is essential in the fight against scaremongers. News outlets should prioritize accuracy over sensationalism, providing well-researched articles that inform rather than frighten the public. Journalists have a responsibility to fact-check their stories and avoid contributing to the climate of fear that scaremongers thrive on. By adhering to ethical standards, the media can help create a more informed society that is less susceptible to panic.In conclusion, the influence of scaremongers (散布恐慌者) in our society cannot be underestimated. Their ability to manipulate public perception and incite fear poses significant challenges, particularly during crises. However, through education, critical thinking, and responsible journalism, we can mitigate their impact. It is essential for individuals to remain vigilant and discerning in the face of fearmongering, ensuring that we do not allow scaremongers to dictate our responses to real threats. Only then can we foster a more rational and resilient society, capable of facing challenges without succumbing to unnecessary panic.