caustically
简明释义
adv. 挖苦地;腐蚀地;讥讽地
英英释义
In a manner that is sarcastic or critical, often causing hurt or damage. | 以讽刺或批评的方式,通常会造成伤害或损害。 |
单词用法
尖刻地说 | |
尖刻地写 | |
尖刻地回应 | |
尖刻的讽刺 | |
尖刻的批评 | |
尖刻的幽默 |
同义词
反义词
温和地 | 她温和地对害怕的孩子说话。 | ||
友好地 | 他友好地提出要帮助她完成项目。 | ||
圆滑地 | 经理圆滑地处理了员工的担忧。 |
例句
1.I wanted to eat my words when I found out that she had painted the picture I criticized so caustically.
当我发现自己作过很尖刻批评的那张画是由她所作时,我想收回前言。
2.Told that Capello had said his players are unable to cope with the "pressure of the World Cup", David James paused and said caustically: "Did he?"
当得知卡佩罗说他的队员无法应对“世界杯的压力”后,大卫·詹姆斯愣了一下,然后不无讥讽地问道:“那么他自己呢?”
3.The first Cynics were a group of ancient Greek philosophers, most notably Diogenes, who caustically denounced the established culture of their time.
最早的犬儒们是一群尖刻讥讽地抨击在他们时代的既定文化的古希腊哲学家们,其中最具代表的是Diogenes。
4.The first Cynics were a group of ancient Greek philosophers, most notably Diogenes, who caustically denounced the established culture of their time.
最早的犬儒们是一群尖刻讥讽地抨击在他们时代的既定文化的古希腊哲学家们,其中最具代表的是Diogenes。
5.During the debate, she spoke caustically about her opponent's lack of experience.
在辩论中,她尖刻地谈到了对手缺乏经验的问题。
6.The comedian's jokes were often caustically humorous, poking fun at societal norms.
这位喜剧演员的笑话常常是尖刻地幽默,嘲讽社会规范。
7.The editorial was written caustically, criticizing the government's policies.
这篇社论写得尖刻地,批评了政府的政策。
8.She responded to the criticism caustically, leaving no room for misunderstanding.
她对批评的回应尖刻地,没有留下任何误解的余地。
9.He made a caustically sarcastic remark about his colleague's work ethic.
他对同事的工作态度做了一个尖刻地讽刺的评论。
作文
In today's world, where communication is often instantaneous and public, the way we express our thoughts can have significant consequences. One of the most critical aspects of communication is the tone we use, which can either build bridges or create rifts. A prime example of this can be seen in the use of sarcasm or biting remarks, which can be described as speaking caustically (尖刻地). This word encapsulates a style of communication that can be both clever and harmful, often leaving a lasting impact on the recipient.When someone speaks caustically (尖刻地), they may intend to convey their point with humor or wit, but the underlying message can be hurtful. For instance, in a workplace setting, a manager might make a sarcastic comment about an employee's performance. While the intention may not be to offend, the result can foster resentment and lower morale among team members. Such interactions highlight the importance of choosing words carefully, especially in professional environments where collaboration is key.Moreover, the prevalence of social media has amplified the effects of caustically (尖刻地) delivered messages. Online platforms provide a shield of anonymity, allowing individuals to express their opinions without facing immediate repercussions. This can lead to a culture where people feel emboldened to make harsh comments that they might not say in person. The viral nature of online communication means that a single caustically (尖刻地) phrased tweet can escalate into a public relations nightmare for individuals and organizations alike.On the other hand, there are moments when speaking caustically (尖刻地) can serve a purpose. In literature and satire, authors often employ this technique to critique societal norms or political figures. For instance, a satirical piece might use caustically (尖刻地) phrased observations to draw attention to hypocrisy, prompting readers to reflect on their beliefs and actions. In such contexts, the sharpness of the language can provoke thought and inspire change, demonstrating that there are nuances to how we interpret caustic remarks.However, it is crucial to recognize the fine line between humor and hurtfulness. While some may appreciate the cleverness of a caustically (尖刻地) delivered joke, others may find it offensive or belittling. This subjectivity underscores the need for empathy in our communications. Understanding the perspectives of others can help us navigate conversations more effectively, allowing us to express ourselves without resorting to damaging remarks.In conclusion, the use of caustically (尖刻地) phrased language can have both positive and negative implications depending on the context and the intent behind the words. It is essential to be mindful of how our expressions affect others, particularly in an age where communication is rapid and far-reaching. By fostering a culture of kindness and respect, we can ensure that our words uplift rather than undermine, creating a more harmonious environment in both our personal and professional lives. Ultimately, while wit and humor are valuable tools in communication, they should never come at the expense of compassion and understanding.
在当今这个交流往往是瞬时和公开的世界里,我们表达思想的方式可能会产生重大后果。沟通的一个关键方面是我们使用的语气,这可以建立桥梁或造成裂痕。一个很好的例子就是讽刺或尖刻的言辞,这可以被描述为以caustically(尖刻地)说话。这个词概括了一种沟通风格,既聪明又有害,常常对接受者留下持久的影响。当某人以caustically(尖刻地)说话时,他们可能打算以幽默或机智传达自己的观点,但潜在的信息可能是伤人的。例如,在工作场所,一位经理可能会对员工的表现做出讽刺的评论。虽然意图可能不是冒犯,但结果可能会培养怨恨,并降低团队成员的士气。这种互动突显了在专业环境中选择用词的重要性,因为合作至关重要。此外,社交媒体的普及加剧了以caustically(尖刻地)传达信息的效果。在线平台提供了一层匿名的保护,使个人能够在不面临直接后果的情况下表达意见。这可能导致一种文化,人们感到有勇气发表他们可能不会当面说出的严厉评论。在线交流的病毒式传播意味着一句caustically(尖刻地)措辞的推文可能会升级为个人和组织的公关噩梦。另一方面,有时以caustically(尖刻地)说话可以发挥作用。在文学和讽刺中,作者常常运用这种技巧来批评社会规范或政治人物。例如,一篇讽刺作品可能会使用caustically(尖刻地)措辞的观察来引起对虚伪的关注,促使读者反思他们的信仰和行为。在这样的背景下,语言的尖锐性可以激发思考并激励改变,表明我们对尖刻言辞的解读存在细微差别。然而,必须认识到幽默与伤害之间的微妙界限。虽然有些人可能欣赏以caustically(尖刻地)传递的笑话的聪明才智,但其他人可能会觉得这是冒犯或贬低。这种主观性强调了我们沟通中同理心的必要性。理解他人的观点可以帮助我们更有效地进行对话,使我们能够表达自己而不诉诸于伤害性的言辞。总之,使用以caustically(尖刻地)措辞的语言在不同的背景和意图下可能具有积极和消极的影响。我们必须注意我们的表达如何影响他人,特别是在一个快速而广泛传播的交流时代。通过培养善良和尊重的文化,我们可以确保我们的言辞提升而非削弱,在个人和职业生活中创造一个更加和谐的环境。最终,虽然机智和幽默在沟通中是宝贵的工具,但它们绝不应以同情和理解为代价。