recusation

简明释义

英[/ˌriːkjuˈzeɪʃən/]美[/ˌriːkjuˈzeɪʃən/]

n. 反对

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Court heard argument on the motion for recusation and reserved their decision.

法院听取了有关撤回动议的论点，并保留了其裁决。

2.The Court heard argument on the motion for recusation and reserved their decision.

法院听取了有关撤回动议的论点，并保留了其裁决。

3.Her recusation was based on the fact that she had previously worked with the defendant.

她的回避是基于她之前与被告有过合作的事实。

4.The lawyer filed a motion for recusation to ensure a fair trial.

律师提交了一项关于回避的动议，以确保公正审判。

5.After the recusation, a new judge was appointed to handle the case.

在回避之后，一位新法官被指定处理该案件。

6.The judge accepted the recusation request due to a potential conflict of interest.

由于可能存在利益冲突，法官接受了回避请求。

7.He argued that the recusation was necessary to maintain public confidence in the legal system.

他辩称，进行回避是维护公众对法律系统信心的必要措施。

作文

In the realm of law, the concept of recusation plays a crucial role in ensuring justice and fairness in legal proceedings. Recusation refers to the act of disqualifying a judge or juror due to a potential conflict of interest or bias that could affect their impartiality. This legal mechanism is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial system and upholding the principle that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done.Imagine a scenario where a judge has a personal connection to one of the parties involved in a case. If this connection is significant enough to raise doubts about the judge's ability to remain neutral, the affected party has the right to file for recusation. This ensures that the judge steps aside and allows another impartial judge to take over the case. The process of recusation is not merely a procedural formality; it is a fundamental aspect of the legal framework that protects the rights of individuals and promotes public confidence in the judicial system.The importance of recusation extends beyond individual cases. It reflects the broader principles of accountability and transparency within the judiciary. When judges are held to high standards of impartiality, it reinforces the belief that the legal system is fair and just. Conversely, if recusation is not taken seriously, it can lead to perceptions of bias and corruption, undermining public trust in the entire legal process.Furthermore, recusation is not limited to judges alone. Jurors can also be subject to recusation if there are concerns about their ability to serve impartially. During jury selection, attorneys have the opportunity to question potential jurors and identify any biases or conflicts of interest. If a juror is found to have a connection to the case or a preconceived notion about the parties involved, they may be recused to ensure a fair trial.The process of recusation can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In some instances, a motion for recusation may need to be filed formally, while in others, it may be sufficient for the judge or juror to voluntarily step aside. Regardless of the method, the underlying goal remains the same: to safeguard the integrity of the legal process and protect the rights of all parties involved.In conclusion, recusation is a vital component of the legal system that ensures fairness and impartiality in judicial proceedings. By allowing for the disqualification of judges and jurors who may have conflicts of interest, recusation helps to maintain public confidence in the rule of law. As citizens, it is our responsibility to understand and advocate for these principles, ensuring that justice is served without prejudice or bias. The concept of recusation is not just a legal term; it embodies the very essence of what it means to have a fair and just society.

在法律领域，recusation的概念在确保法律程序的公正和公平方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Recusation指的是由于潜在的利益冲突或偏见而使法官或陪审员失去资格的行为。这一法律机制对于维护司法系统的完整性和坚持正义不仅要实现，而且还要被看到这一原则至关重要。想象一个场景，其中一名法官与案件中涉及的一方有个人联系。如果这种联系足够重要，以至于引发对法官保持中立能力的怀疑，则受影响的一方有权申请recusation。这确保法官退位，让另一名公正的法官接手案件。Recusation的过程不仅仅是程序上的形式；它是保护个人权利和促进公众对司法系统信心的法律框架的基本方面。Recusation的重要性不仅限于个别案件。它反映了更广泛的责任和透明度原则。在法官被要求遵守高标准的公正性时，它增强了人们对法律系统公平公正的信念。相反，如果不认真对待recusation，可能会导致对偏见和腐败的看法，从而破坏公众对整个法律程序的信任。此外，recusation不仅限于法官。陪审员也可以在他们的公正服务能力受到质疑时被要求recusation。在陪审团选择过程中，律师有机会质询潜在陪审员，并识别任何偏见或利益冲突。如果发现某名陪审员与案件有联系或对相关方有先入之见，他们可能会被排除在外，以确保公正审判。Recusation的过程可能因管辖权和案件特定情况而异。在某些情况下，可能需要正式提交recusation动议，而在其他情况下，法官或陪审员自愿退位可能就足够了。无论方法如何，根本目标始终是相同的：保护法律程序的完整性，保护所有相关方的权利。总之，recusation是法律系统的重要组成部分，确保司法程序的公平和公正。通过允许因利益冲突而被取消资格的法官和陪审员，recusation有助于维护公众对法治的信心。作为公民，我们有责任理解并倡导这些原则，确保在没有偏见或偏见的情况下实现正义。Recusation的概念不仅仅是一个法律术语；它体现了拥有一个公平公正社会的本质。