withholding
简明释义
n. 扣缴税款
v. 克制；阻挡（withhold 的 ing 形式）
英英释义
The act of holding back or not giving something that is due or expected. | 不给予或保留应得或预期的东西的行为。 |
In finance, it refers to the deduction of tax from an employee's wages by an employer. | 在财务上，指雇主从员工工资中扣除税款。 |
单词用法
预扣税款代理人 | |
（美）代扣所得税（指企事业雇主代替政府从雇员薪金中扣除的所得税） |
同义词
| 保留 | The retention of information can lead to better understanding. | 信息的保留可以导致更好的理解。 | |
| 抑制 | 他在会议上抑制自己的情感。 | ||
| 克制 | 克制做出草率决定通常是明智的。 | ||
| 暂停 | The suspension of payments was necessary due to financial issues. | 由于财务问题，暂停付款是必要的。 |
反义词
| 分配 | 这个慈善机构正在向有需要的人分配食物。 | ||
| 释放 | 公司下个月将发布新产品。 | ||
| 给予 | 她正在给予当地社区支持。 |
例句
1.She was accused of withholding information from the police.
她被指控对警方知情不报。
2.Article 11. Withholding agents and taxpayers personally filing returns must pay tax within the prescribed time limit.
第十一条扣缴义务人和自行申报纳税人，必须按照规定的期限，缴纳税款。
3.There is no justification for withholding information on individual high-end employees from the public or shareholders.
没有任何正当理由向公众和股东隐瞒个别高端雇员的信息。
4.One of the accused got off lightly in exchange for pleading guilty to withholding information from Congress.
其中一名被告获得了从轻发落，因其承认了未向国会提供情报的罪行。
5.Do you think i'm just withholding information because i like hanging out with you.
你以为我隐瞒消息是因为喜欢和你待一起么?
6.The coroner's office reiterated that it was withholding its full report on Mr. Jackson's death pending the police investigation.
验尸官办公室重申，杰克逊之死的完整报告要待警方调查结束后才公布。
7.The company is withholding bonuses until the project is completed.
公司在项目完成之前将扣留奖金。
8.The government is withholding funds for the new infrastructure project.
政府正在保留新基础设施项目的资金。
9.The tax office is withholding a portion of your refund due to outstanding debts.
税务局由于未偿还的债务，正在扣留你部分退款。
10.He was accused of withholding evidence during the trial.
他被指控在审判期间隐瞒证据。
11.She felt that her boss was withholding important information from her.
她觉得老板在对她隐瞒重要信息。
作文
Withholding information can often lead to misunderstandings and conflicts in various situations. In personal relationships, for instance, when one partner chooses to withhold their feelings or thoughts, it can create a barrier that prevents effective communication. This lack of transparency may lead to assumptions and misinterpretations, ultimately damaging the trust between individuals. It is essential to recognize that open dialogue fosters a healthier connection, allowing both parties to express themselves freely without fear of judgment. Therefore, instead of withholding emotions, sharing them can pave the way for deeper understanding and intimacy.In the workplace, withholding critical information can have detrimental effects on team dynamics and productivity. When team members do not share their insights or updates, it can result in duplicated efforts or missed opportunities. For example, if a project manager decides to withhold feedback from a team member, that individual may continue down an unproductive path, unaware of the necessary adjustments needed for success. Encouraging an environment where information is shared openly can enhance collaboration and innovation. Teams that prioritize transparency tend to perform better as they leverage each member's strengths and insights.Moreover, in the realm of governance and public policy, withholding information from citizens can undermine democracy. When governments choose to keep vital information secret, it erodes public trust and accountability. Citizens have the right to know about decisions that affect their lives, and withholding this information can lead to disillusionment and disengagement from the political process. Transparency is crucial for an informed electorate, and leaders should strive to provide access to information that empowers citizens to make educated decisions.Furthermore, in educational settings, withholding knowledge from students can hinder their learning experience. Educators who fail to provide comprehensive information may leave students feeling confused and unprepared. It is essential for teachers to create an inclusive environment where questions are encouraged, and information is readily available. By doing so, they can foster a culture of curiosity and critical thinking, enabling students to thrive academically.In conclusion, whether in personal relationships, workplaces, governance, or education, withholding information can lead to negative consequences. It is crucial to understand the importance of transparency and open communication in fostering trust and collaboration. By choosing to share rather than withhold, individuals and organizations can create a more positive and productive environment. Ultimately, embracing openness leads to stronger relationships, enhanced teamwork, and a more informed society. We must recognize the power of information and the impact of our choices regarding its dissemination. Therefore, let us strive to be transparent and communicative in all aspects of our lives, avoiding the pitfalls of withholding vital information.
隐瞒信息往往会导致各种情况下的误解和冲突。例如，在个人关系中，当一方选择隐瞒自己的感受或想法时，可能会造成一种障碍，阻碍有效沟通。这种缺乏透明度可能导致假设和误解，最终损害个人之间的信任。因此，认识到开放的对话促进更健康的联系是至关重要的，使双方能够自由表达自己，而不必担心被评判。因此，与其隐瞒情感，不如分享这些情感，这可以为更深入的理解和亲密关系铺平道路。在工作场所，隐瞒关键信息可能对团队动态和生产力产生不利影响。当团队成员不分享他们的见解或更新时，可能会导致重复努力或错失机会。例如，如果项目经理决定隐瞒对团队成员的反馈，该成员可能会继续走上一条不成功的道路，而不知道成功所需的必要调整。鼓励一个信息共享的环境可以增强合作和创新。优先考虑透明度的团队往往表现得更好，因为他们利用每个成员的优势和见解。此外，在治理和公共政策领域，政府如果对公民隐瞒信息，可能会破坏民主。当政府选择保留重要信息时，会侵蚀公众信任和问责制。公民有权了解影响他们生活的决策，而隐瞒这些信息可能导致失望和对政治过程的疏远。透明度对于知情选民至关重要，领导者应努力提供能够让公民做出明智决定的信息。此外，在教育环境中，隐瞒学生知识可能会妨碍他们的学习体验。未能提供全面信息的教育工作者可能会让学生感到困惑和没有准备。教师必须创造一个包容的环境，鼓励提问，并随时提供信息。通过这样做，他们可以培养好奇心和批判性思维的文化，使学生在学业上蓬勃发展。总之，无论是在个人关系、工作场所、治理还是教育中，隐瞒信息都可能导致负面后果。理解透明度和开放沟通在促进信任和合作中的重要性至关重要。通过选择分享而不是隐瞒，个人和组织可以创造一个更积极和富有成效的环境。最终，拥抱开放将导致更强的关系、更好的团队合作和更知情的社会。我们必须认识到信息的力量以及我们在传播信息方面的选择所产生的影响。因此，让我们在生活的各个方面努力做到透明和沟通，避免隐瞒重要信息的陷阱。
