smears

简明释义

英[smɪəz]美[smɪrz]

n. 涂布剂；油迹；污点；涂片标本（smear 的复数形式）

v. 涂抹（smear 的单三形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In 58% of blood smears taken from 7 of the mutant mice, fragmented red cells were observed, but without thrombocytopenia.

取材于7只突变鼠的血涂片中，58%观察到碎片红细胞，但是没有血小板减少。

2.There are smears of paint on the wallpaper.

壁纸上有油漆的污点。

3.It is used to remove fast oil stain, carbon residue and other smears on cars, motorbikes and other machine surfaces.

能去除汽车、摩托车的发动机及其它机械表面的顽固油渍、碳渍等污垢。(特别适用于清洁旧发动机)。

4.Sputum smears of patients can be difficult Kechu aerosol inhalation.

对痰粘稠难以咳出的病人可做雾化吸入。

5.She smears grease on her hands everyday .

她每天都往手上涂油脂。

6.Samples were peripheral blood cells, bone marrow smears and liver touch imprint preparations.

标本采用外周血细胞滴片、骨髓涂片和肝脏组织印片。

7.The campaign yesterday established a new website, Fight the Smears, to counter such rumors.

竞选团昨天做了一个新的网页反击这个谣言。

8.For thosewith negative smears, dapsone and rifampin for one year is the standard of carein the United States.

如果是阴性，服用氨苯砜与利福平1年是标准疗法。

9.She noticed smears of chocolate on her hands after making cookies.

她在做饼干后发现手上有巧克力涂抹。

10.The artist used a brush to create beautiful smears of paint on the canvas.

艺术家用刷子在画布上创造了美丽的涂抹。

11.Make sure to clean the smears off your glasses before the meeting.

确保在会议之前把眼镜上的污渍擦干净。

12.He accidentally left smears of ink on the paper.

他不小心在纸上留下了墨水涂抹。

13.The detective found smears of blood at the crime scene.

侦探在犯罪现场发现了血迹。

作文

In today's world, the concept of reputation is more fragile than ever. With the rise of social media and instant communication, information can spread rapidly, and sometimes this information is not accurate. One of the most damaging forms of misinformation is what we call smears, or in Chinese, 抹黑. These are often false or exaggerated claims made about an individual or organization with the intent to damage their reputation. In this essay, I will explore the nature of smears and how they impact society, as well as ways to combat them.To begin with, smears can take many forms. They can be subtle, like insinuating that someone is untrustworthy without providing evidence, or overt, such as outright lies about a person's character or actions. The digital age has made it easier for these smears to spread. A single tweet or post can reach thousands, if not millions, of people in a matter of minutes. This rapid dissemination of false information can lead to devastating consequences for the individuals targeted. For example, politicians often become victims of smears during election campaigns, where opponents may spread falsehoods to sway public opinion.Moreover, smears can have a chilling effect on free speech and open discourse. When individuals fear that their words or actions may be taken out of context and used against them, they may become less willing to express their opinions. This self-censorship stifles healthy debate and can lead to a homogenized society where only certain viewpoints are expressed. It is essential to recognize that while criticism and accountability are necessary in any democratic society, smears do not contribute to constructive dialogue; instead, they create division and hostility.Combating smears requires a multifaceted approach. First, individuals must be educated about media literacy. Understanding how to critically evaluate sources of information is crucial in identifying potential smears. By encouraging skepticism and promoting fact-checking, we can empower people to discern truth from falsehood. Additionally, social media platforms have a responsibility to monitor and manage the spread of misinformation. Implementing stricter policies against the dissemination of smears and providing users with tools to report false information can help mitigate the issue.Furthermore, it is vital for those who are targeted by smears to respond thoughtfully. Instead of resorting to anger or defensiveness, a calm and reasoned rebuttal can be more effective. Providing clear evidence to counter false claims can help restore one’s reputation and demonstrate the importance of truth over sensationalism. Public figures, in particular, should be prepared to address smears head-on and engage with their audience transparently.In conclusion, smears represent a significant threat to personal reputations and societal discourse. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant against the spread of misinformation. By fostering media literacy, holding platforms accountable, and responding to smears with integrity, we can work towards a more informed and respectful society. Only then can we ensure that truth prevails over falsehood and that individuals are protected from the damaging effects of smears.

在当今世界，声誉的概念比以往任何时候都更加脆弱。随着社交媒体和即时通讯的兴起，信息可以迅速传播，有时这些信息并不准确。我们所称之为抹黑（smears）的误导性信息是最具破坏性的形式之一。这些通常是关于个人或组织的虚假或夸大的说法，目的是损害他们的声誉。在这篇文章中，我将探讨抹黑的本质及其对社会的影响，以及应对它们的方法。首先，抹黑可以采取多种形式。它们可以是微妙的，例如暗示某人不可信而没有提供证据，或者是明显的，比如对一个人的性格或行为的彻底谎言。数字时代使得这些抹黑更容易传播。一条推文或帖子在几分钟内就可以达到成千上万甚至数百万的人。这种虚假信息的快速传播可能对被针对的个人造成毁灭性的后果。例如，政治家在选举期间常常成为抹黑的受害者，对手可能传播虚假信息以影响公众舆论。此外，抹黑可能对言论自由和开放讨论产生寒蝉效应。当个人担心他们的话语或行为可能被断章取义并用来攻击自己时，他们可能会变得不愿意表达自己的观点。这种自我审查扼杀了健康的辩论，并可能导致一个只有某些观点被表达的同质化社会。必须认识到，虽然批评和问责在任何民主社会中都是必要的，但抹黑并未促进建设性的对话；相反，它们制造了分裂和敌意。抵制抹黑需要多方面的努力。首先，必须教育个人关于媒体素养。理解如何批判性地评估信息来源对于识别潜在的抹黑至关重要。通过鼓励怀疑精神和促进事实核查，我们可以赋予人们辨别真相与虚假的能力。此外，社交媒体平台有责任监控和管理虚假信息的传播。实施更严格的政策以抵制抹黑的传播，并为用户提供举报虚假信息的工具，可以帮助缓解这一问题。此外，被抹黑的人必须做出深思熟虑的回应。与其愤怒或防御，不如冷静而理智的反驳可能更有效。提供明确的证据来反驳虚假主张可以帮助恢复一个人的声誉，并展示真相胜于耸人听闻的重要性。尤其是公共人物，应准备好正面回应抹黑，并透明地与他们的受众互动。总之，抹黑对个人声誉和社会话语构成了重大威胁。随着我们在日益复杂的信息环境中航行，保持警惕以抵制虚假信息的传播至关重要。通过促进媒体素养、追究平台责任以及以诚信回应抹黑，我们可以朝着一个更有信息量和尊重的社会迈进。只有这样，我们才能确保真相战胜虚假，保护个人免受抹黑的破坏性影响。