dysgenic

简明释义

英[dɪsˈdʒenɪk]美[dɪsˈdʒenɪk]

adj. 非优生学的；对人类有不良影响的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In “Idiocracy” he turns his talents to futurology—and to the troubling question of the long-term impact of dysgenic breeding, junk food and grunge culture on America's collective IQ.

在《白痴帝国》中，Judge先生把他本人的天才用于预测未来：他试图回答反优生行为、垃圾食品以及粗浅文化从长期来看对美国人的总体智力水平有何影响。

2.In “Idiocracy” he turns his talents to futurology—and to the troubling question of the long-term impact of dysgenic breeding, junk food and grunge culture on America's collective IQ.

在《白痴帝国》中，Judge先生把他本人的天才用于预测未来：他试图回答反优生行为、垃圾食品以及粗浅文化从长期来看对美国人的总体智力水平有何影响。

3.The documentary explored how urbanization might lead to dysgenic 劣遗传的 outcomes for future generations.

这部纪录片探讨了城市化如何可能导致未来几代人的dysgenic 劣遗传的结果。

4.The concept of dysgenic 劣遗传的 factors is often debated in the context of public health policies.

在公共卫生政策的背景下，dysgenic 劣遗传的因素的概念常常被辩论。

5.Many believe that poor education and nutrition contribute to a dysgenic 劣遗传的 environment.

许多人认为，教育和营养不良会导致一个dysgenic 劣遗传的环境。

6.The researchers warned that certain lifestyle choices could lead to a more dysgenic 劣遗传的 population over time.

研究人员警告说，某些生活方式选择可能会导致未来人口变得更加dysgenic 劣遗传的。

7.Some argue that neglecting genetic health can result in dysgenic 劣遗传的 traits becoming more prevalent.

有人认为，忽视基因健康可能导致dysgenic 劣遗传的特征变得更加普遍。

作文

The concept of dysgenic refers to the idea that certain traits or characteristics can be passed down through generations, leading to a decline in the overall genetic quality of a population. This term is often associated with discussions about genetics, heredity, and the implications of social policies on the genetic makeup of future generations. In a world where scientific advancements are continually reshaping our understanding of biology, the notion of dysgenic factors becomes increasingly relevant. To explore this concept further, we must consider the historical context in which it arose. The early 20th century saw a rise in eugenics movements, which aimed to improve the genetic quality of human populations through selective breeding. While these movements were based on the belief that certain traits were superior, they often led to unethical practices and discrimination. The backlash against eugenics has led to a more cautious approach to genetics, but the concern over dysgenic trends persists. One of the primary concerns surrounding dysgenic factors is the potential impact of modern societal changes on genetic diversity. For instance, as societies become more interconnected, there is a tendency for people to choose partners based on social compatibility rather than genetic factors. This can lead to a reduction in genetic diversity, which may have unforeseen consequences for the health and resilience of populations. Moreover, the advent of advanced medical technologies has allowed individuals with genetic disorders to live longer and reproduce. While this is undoubtedly a positive development in terms of individual health and quality of life, it raises questions about the long-term implications for the genetic health of future generations. If individuals with dysgenic traits are able to pass on their genes, could this lead to an increase in genetic disorders within the population? It is essential to strike a balance between compassion for individuals with disabilities and the broader implications for society as a whole. Additionally, socioeconomic factors play a significant role in the discussion of dysgenic trends. Access to healthcare, education, and resources can influence reproductive choices and the overall genetic health of a population. In some cases, lower socioeconomic groups may have higher rates of certain genetic disorders due to a lack of access to preventive care and education. Addressing these disparities is crucial not only for ethical reasons but also for the long-term health of the population. In conclusion, the term dysgenic encapsulates a complex interplay of genetics, ethics, and social policy. As we navigate the challenges of modern society, it is vital to consider the implications of our choices on the genetic makeup of future generations. While advancements in medicine and technology offer incredible opportunities for improving health outcomes, we must remain vigilant about the potential dysgenic effects of these changes. Ultimately, fostering a society that values genetic diversity, equitable access to healthcare, and ethical considerations in reproductive choices will be essential in ensuring a healthy and resilient future for all.

‘dysgenic’这个概念指的是某些特征或特性可以通过世代相传，从而导致一个种群整体遗传质量的下降。这个术语通常与遗传学、遗传和社会政策对未来几代人遗传构成的影响的讨论有关。在科学进步不断重塑我们对生物学理解的世界中，‘dysgenic’因素的概念变得愈加相关。要进一步探讨这个概念，我们必须考虑它产生的历史背景。20世纪初，优生学运动的兴起旨在通过选择性繁殖来改善人类种群的遗传质量。虽然这些运动基于某些特征优越的信念，但往往导致不道德的行为和歧视。对优生学的反弹使我们对遗传学采取了更为谨慎的态度，但对‘dysgenic’趋势的关注依然存在。围绕‘dysgenic’因素的主要担忧之一是现代社会变化对遗传多样性的潜在影响。例如，随着社会的日益互联，人们倾向于根据社会兼容性而非遗传因素选择伴侣。这可能导致遗传多样性的减少，而这可能对种群的健康和韧性产生不可预见的后果。此外，先进医疗技术的出现使得患有遗传疾病的个体能够活得更久并生育。虽然这无疑是个人健康和生活质量上的积极发展，但它引发了关于未来几代人遗传健康的长期影响的问题。如果具有‘dysgenic’特征的个体能够传递他们的基因，这是否会导致种群中遗传疾病的增加？在关心残疾个体的同时，平衡社会整体的广泛影响至关重要。此外，社会经济因素在‘dysgenic’趋势的讨论中也扮演着重要角色。医疗保健、教育和资源的获取可能影响生育选择和种群的整体遗传健康。在某些情况下，由于缺乏预防护理和教育，低社会经济群体可能具有较高的某些遗传疾病的发生率。解决这些差距不仅出于伦理原因，也是为了种群的长期健康。总之，‘dysgenic’一词概括了遗传学、伦理学和社会政策之间复杂的相互关系。在我们应对现代社会的挑战时，考虑我们的选择对未来几代人遗传构成的影响至关重要。尽管医学和技术的进步为改善健康结果提供了令人难以置信的机会，但我们必须保持警惕，以防这些变化带来的潜在‘dysgenic’影响。最终，培养一个重视遗传多样性、平等获取医疗保健以及在生育选择中考虑伦理因素的社会，对于确保所有人的健康和韧性未来至关重要。