unsworn

简明释义

英[ʌnˈswɔrn]美[ʌnˈswɔrn]

adj. 未宣誓的

v. 取消誓言（unswear 的过去式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Sworn or unsworn evidence either orally or in writing given by a person.

由一人以口头或书面作出的经宣誓或未宣誓证据。

2.An appellant is usually given a choice at the hearing of either making an unsworn statement or alternatively giving evidence on oath in support of this appeal.

进行聆讯时，上诉人通常可选择不宣誓作供或宣誓下作供以支持其上诉。

3.An appellant is usually given a choice at the hearing of either making an unsworn statement or alternatively giving evidence on oath in support of this appeal.

进行聆讯时，上诉人通常可选择不宣誓作供或宣誓下作供以支持其上诉。

4.The witness stands unsworn unsworn testimony.

那个证人歪曲了他的证词。

5.In some jurisdictions, unsworn 未宣誓的 declarations can be used in court.

在某些法域中，未宣誓的声明可以在法庭上使用。

6.The witness provided an unsworn 未宣誓的 statement to the police.

证人向警方提供了一份未宣誓的声明。

7.He submitted an unsworn 未宣誓的 affidavit to support his claim.

他提交了一份未宣誓的宣誓书以支持他的索赔。

8.During the trial, several unsworn 未宣誓的 statements were presented by the defense.

在审判过程中，辩方提交了几份未宣誓的声明。

9.The judge allowed the unsworn 未宣誓的 testimony to be entered into the record.

法官允许将未宣誓的证词记录在案。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the concept of being unsworn holds significant importance. The term unsworn refers to a statement or testimony that has not been made under oath. This distinction is crucial in legal proceedings, where the credibility and reliability of evidence can often hinge on whether it is given under oath or not. An unsworn statement may be considered less reliable than a sworn one, as it lacks the formal commitment to tell the truth that accompanies an oath. For instance, during a trial, witnesses are usually required to take an oath before giving their testimonies. This oath serves as a solemn promise to provide truthful information, which is fundamental to the pursuit of justice. However, there are instances where individuals may provide unsworn statements, such as in preliminary hearings or when giving informal accounts of events. While these unsworn statements can still offer valuable insights, they may not carry the same weight as sworn testimonies in the eyes of the court.Moreover, the implications of unsworn statements extend beyond the courtroom. In everyday life, people often make declarations or assertions that are not accompanied by any formal oath. For example, a person might express an opinion about a situation or share their perspective on a matter without having to swear to its truthfulness. While these unsworn expressions can contribute to discussions and debates, they also highlight the importance of critical thinking and discernment, as the audience must evaluate the credibility of the source.In journalism, the distinction between sworn and unsworn sources can also be significant. Reporters often rely on both types of information to construct narratives and report on events. However, the integrity of a news story can be compromised if unsworn sources are presented as definitive facts without proper context. This underscores the responsibility of journalists to verify information and present it accurately, ensuring that the public receives trustworthy news.Furthermore, the use of unsworn statements can also be seen in various fields such as academia and research. Scholars may cite unsworn opinions or observations from experts in their writings, but they must clearly distinguish these from established facts supported by empirical evidence. This practice fosters transparency and allows readers to assess the reliability of the information presented.In conclusion, the term unsworn encompasses a wide range of implications across different contexts. Whether in legal settings, everyday conversations, journalism, or academic discourse, understanding the nature and limitations of unsworn statements is essential. It reminds us of the importance of truthfulness and the need for rigorous standards when evaluating claims. As we navigate through various forms of communication, being aware of the distinction between sworn and unsworn information can help us become more discerning consumers of knowledge and more responsible communicators ourselves.

在法律和正义的领域中，unsworn这一概念具有重要意义。术语unsworn指的是未在宣誓下作出的陈述或证词。这一区别在法律程序中至关重要，因为证据的可信度和可靠性往往取决于其是否在宣誓下提供。unsworn的陈述可能被认为不如宣誓的陈述可靠，因为它缺乏伴随宣誓而来的诚实承诺。例如，在审判过程中，证人通常需要在作证之前宣誓。这个宣誓作为对提供真实信息的庄严承诺，对于追求正义至关重要。然而，在某些情况下，个人可能会提供unsworn的陈述，例如在初步听证会上或非正式地叙述事件时。虽然这些unsworn的陈述仍然可以提供有价值的见解，但在法庭上，它们可能不会像宣誓证词那样受到重视。此外，unsworn陈述的影响超越了法庭。在日常生活中，人们经常做出没有正式宣誓的声明或主张。例如，一个人可能会表达对某种情况的看法或分享他们对某个问题的看法，而无需宣誓其真实性。虽然这些unsworn的表达可以促进讨论和辩论，但它们也突显了批判性思维和辨别能力的重要性，因为听众必须评估信息来源的可信度。在新闻报道中，宣誓与unsworn来源之间的区别也可能很重要。记者通常依赖这两种类型的信息来构建叙事并报道事件。然而，如果unsworn的来源在没有适当背景的情况下被呈现为确凿的事实，则可能会损害新闻故事的完整性。这强调了记者核实信息和准确呈现的责任，以确保公众获得可信的新闻。此外，unsworn陈述的使用在学术和研究等各个领域也可以看到。学者们可能会在自己的著作中引用专家的unsworn意见或观察，但他们必须清楚地区分这些与由实证证据支持的已建立事实。这种做法促进了透明度，使读者能够评估所呈现信息的可靠性。总之，术语unsworn在不同的背景下包含广泛的含义。无论是在法律环境、日常对话、新闻报道还是学术讨论中，理解unsworn陈述的性质和局限性都是至关重要的。它提醒我们诚实的重要性，以及在评估主张时需要严格的标准。当我们在各种沟通形式中穿行时，意识到宣誓信息与unsworn信息之间的区别可以帮助我们成为更具辨识力的知识消费者和更负责任的沟通者。