fined

简明释义

英[faɪnd]美[faɪnd]

v. 罚钱（fine 的过去式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.If they are late, they can be fined.

如果她们迟到，将会被罚款。

2.He has been fined five thousand dollars and given a severe reprimand.

他被罚款5000美元，并且受到严厉的训斥。

3.Anyone who break the rule and litter everywhere should be fined.

任何违反规定，随处扔垃圾的人都应该被罚款。

4.So they should be fined if they throw the rubbish on the ground.

所以如果他们把垃圾扔在地上的话，他们应该被罚款。

5.He was fined for speeding last year.

他去年因超速驾驶被罚了款。

6.She was fined $200 for driving carelessly.

她由于粗心驾驶被罚$200。

7.I was fined $158 for exceeding the speed limit by 15 mph.

我因超限速15英里每小时被罚了$158。

8.The factory was fined for discharging chemicals into the river.

这家工厂因往河里排放化学物质而被罚款。

9.The restaurant was fined 罚款 for violating health codes.

这家餐厅因违反卫生法规而被罚款。

10.The company was fined 罚款 for polluting the river.

该公司因污染河流而被罚款。

11.He was fined 罚款 for speeding on the highway.

他因在高速公路上超速而被罚款。

12.They were fined 罚款 for littering in the park.

他们因在公园乱扔垃圾而被罚款。

13.She got fined 罚款 for not wearing a seatbelt.

她因未系安全带而被罚款。

作文

In today's society, rules and regulations are established to maintain order and ensure safety. When individuals or organizations violate these laws, they often face penalties, one of which is being 罚款. This practice serves as a deterrent to prevent future infractions and encourages compliance with the law. The concept of being 罚款 is not new; it has existed for centuries in various forms across different cultures. For example, in ancient Rome, citizens could be 罚款 for offenses ranging from minor disturbances to significant breaches of public order.The process of being 罚款 typically involves a legal framework where the amount of the fine correlates with the severity of the offense. For instance, a driver caught speeding might be 罚款 a certain amount depending on how much they exceeded the speed limit. This system aims to create a fair and just approach to law enforcement, ensuring that penalties are proportional to the wrongdoing.However, the effectiveness of fines as a punishment can vary. In some cases, individuals may view a 罚款 as merely a cost of doing business, particularly in corporate environments. Large companies may find it easier to pay a 罚款 than to change practices that could be costly in other ways. This raises questions about the fairness and impact of such penalties. Are they truly serving their purpose if they do not deter bad behavior? Moreover, the imposition of a 罚款 can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. A $100 fine might be a minor inconvenience for someone with a substantial income, but it could represent a significant financial burden for someone living paycheck to paycheck. This disparity highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to penalties, one that takes into account the financial situation of the offender. In recent years, there have been discussions about reforming how fines are imposed. Some jurisdictions have begun to implement income-based fines, where the amount of the 罚款 is adjusted based on the offender's income level. This approach aims to create a more equitable system that holds individuals accountable without causing undue hardship. Additionally, the rise of technology and data analysis has enabled law enforcement agencies to track violations more effectively, leading to a higher likelihood of being 罚款. This trend raises concerns about privacy and the potential for over-policing, particularly in communities that already face scrutiny. Balancing the need for public safety with individual rights is an ongoing challenge that society must navigate. In conclusion, being 罚款 is a common consequence of violating laws and regulations. While it serves an important role in promoting compliance and maintaining order, the implications of fines extend beyond simple punishment. As society evolves, so too must our understanding and application of penalties to ensure they are fair, effective, and just. Moving forward, it is crucial for lawmakers and communities to engage in meaningful dialogue about how to best implement fines in a way that promotes justice and equity for all individuals.

在当今社会，为了维护秩序和确保安全，制定了各种规则和法规。当个人或组织违反这些法律时，他们通常会面临惩罚，其中之一就是被罚款。这一做法作为一种威慑手段，旨在防止未来的违规行为，并鼓励遵守法律。被罚款的概念并不新鲜；它在不同文化中以各种形式存在了几个世纪。例如，在古罗马，公民因从轻微干扰到重大公共秩序违反的罪行而可能被罚款。被罚款的过程通常涉及一个法律框架，其中罚款金额与违规行为的严重性相关。例如，一名超速驾驶者可能会根据其超速程度被罚款一定金额。这个系统旨在创造一种公平公正的执法方式，确保惩罚与错误行为成比例。然而，罚款作为惩罚的有效性可能会有所不同。在某些情况下，个人可能将被罚款视为商业成本，尤其是在企业环境中。大型公司可能发现支付罚款比改变可能导致其他成本的做法更容易。这引发了关于这种惩罚公平性和影响的问题。如果罚款不能阻止不良行为，那它们是否真正发挥了作用？此外，罚款的实施可能对低收入个体产生不成比例的影响。对于收入可观的人来说，100美元的罚款可能只是小小的不便，但对于生活在薪水之间的人来说，这可能代表着重大的经济负担。这种差异突显了对惩罚采取更细致入微的方法的必要性，这种方法考虑到违法者的经济状况。近年来，关于改革罚款实施方式的讨论逐渐增多。一些司法管辖区开始实施基于收入的罚款，即罚款金额根据违法者的收入水平进行调整。这一方法旨在创造一个更加公平的系统，使个人承担责任，而不会造成不必要的经济困难。此外，科技和数据分析的兴起使执法机构能够更有效地追踪违规行为，从而提高被罚款的可能性。这一趋势引发了对隐私权和潜在过度警务的担忧，尤其是在已经面临审查的社区中。平衡公共安全需求与个人权利是一项社会必须应对的持续挑战。总之，被罚款是违反法律法规的常见后果。虽然它在促进合规和维护秩序方面发挥着重要作用，但罚款的含义超出了简单的惩罚。随着社会的发展，我们对惩罚的理解和应用也必须演变，以确保它们是公平、有效和公正的。展望未来，立法者和社区必须就如何最佳实施罚款进行有意义的对话，以促进所有个体的正义和平等。