verbalism

简明释义

英[ˈvɜːb(ə)lɪz(ə)m]美[ˈvɜːrblɪzm]

n. 咬文嚼字；冗词；言语表达；套话

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Polite verbalism is the respect to others. Moreover, it adds your demeanor.

礼貌的言辞是对别人的尊重，更增添了自己的风度。

2.One of the main reasons is that we didn't establish the Principle of Directness and Verbalism.

主要原因之一就是没有确立直接言词原则。

3.Polite verbalism is the respect to others.

礼貌的言辞是对别人的尊重。

4.In the Common Law System countries, there is the Hearsay Rule, which is very similar to the Principle of Directness and Verbalism.

在英美法系也有与之极为相似的传闻证据规则，并且在许多方面体现出了更为严厉的要求。

5.The idea was immediate but the verbalism took hours.

想法瞬间可得，但表达出来却花费时间。

6.In the Common Law System countries, there is the Hearsay Rule, which is very similar to the Principle of Directness and Verbalism.

在英美法系也有与之极为相似的传闻证据规则，并且在许多方面体现出了更为严厉的要求。

7.In China, the current stipulations still have some distance to the establishment of the Principle of Directness and Verbalism.

在我国，现有规定对直接言词原则的真正确立还差距很大。

8.His speech was filled with verbalism, making it hard for the audience to follow his points.

他的演讲充满了语言主义，让听众很难跟上他的观点。

9.The professor criticized the student's essay for its excessive verbalism, which made it difficult to understand the main argument.

教授批评学生的论文过于语言主义，这使得主旨难以理解。

10.In legal discussions, verbalism can lead to misunderstandings if terms are not clearly defined.

在法律讨论中，如果术语没有明确定义，语言主义可能导致误解。

11.The article was criticized for its verbalism, which obscured the key findings of the research.

这篇文章因其语言主义而受到批评，这使得研究的关键发现变得模糊不清。

12.The marketing team was warned against using too much verbalism in their advertisements, as simplicity often sells better.

市场团队被警告不要在广告中使用过多的语言主义，因为简单的表达通常更能吸引消费者。

作文

In the realm of communication, the term verbalism refers to the use of words in a manner that emphasizes expression over substance. It often manifests as an elaborate or unnecessarily complex way of speaking that can obscure meaning rather than clarify it. The phenomenon of verbalism is particularly prevalent in academic settings, where individuals may feel compelled to use sophisticated vocabulary and convoluted sentences to demonstrate their knowledge. However, this approach can lead to confusion among listeners or readers who may struggle to grasp the intended message. For instance, consider a professor delivering a lecture filled with jargon and technical terms. While the intent may be to convey expertise, the result can alienate students who are not familiar with such language. This is where verbalism becomes counterproductive; instead of fostering understanding, it creates barriers. Effective communication should prioritize clarity and accessibility, ensuring that the audience can engage with the material being presented. Moreover, verbalism can also seep into everyday conversations. People often resort to overly complicated phrases when simpler ones would suffice. For example, someone might say, 'I am currently in the process of evaluating the potential implications of my choices,' instead of simply stating, 'I am thinking about my choices.' This tendency to indulge in verbalism can stem from a desire to impress others or to appear more knowledgeable. Yet, it risks losing the listener's interest and diluting the message. Additionally, in the context of writing, verbalism can lead to unnecessary wordiness. Writers may fill their essays or reports with excessive adjectives and adverbs, which can detract from the main points they wish to convey. An example might be a research paper that states, 'The results of the experiment were indicative of a significant correlation between the variables studied,' when a more straightforward approach would be, 'The experiment showed a strong link between the variables.' By avoiding verbalism, writers can enhance the readability of their work and ensure that their arguments are presented effectively. The negative implications of verbalism extend beyond individual interactions; they can also affect broader societal discourse. In political arenas, for instance, politicians may employ verbalism to evade direct answers or to mask their true intentions. This can lead to a lack of transparency and trust, as constituents may feel misled by elaborate rhetoric that fails to address their concerns. Clear and honest communication is essential in building relationships and fostering understanding within communities. In conclusion, while the use of language is a powerful tool for expression, it is crucial to be mindful of the pitfalls of verbalism. Striving for clarity and simplicity in communication not only enhances understanding but also fosters genuine connections between individuals. Whether in academia, casual conversation, or public discourse, prioritizing straightforwardness over complexity can lead to more effective and meaningful exchanges. By recognizing the tendency towards verbalism and consciously choosing to communicate clearly, we can create a more inclusive and engaging environment for all.

在交流领域，术语verbalism指的是以强调表达而非实质内容的方式使用语言。它通常表现为一种复杂或不必要的复杂说话方式，这可能会模糊意义而不是澄清它。verbalism这一现象在学术环境中特别普遍，那里的个体可能感到有必要使用复杂的词汇和曲折的句子来展示他们的知识。然而，这种方式可能导致听众或读者感到困惑，因为他们可能难以理解所传达的信息。例如，考虑一个教授进行讲座，内容充满行话和专业术语。虽然意图可能是传递专业知识，但结果可能会使不熟悉这种语言的学生感到疏离。这就是verbalism变得适得其反的地方；有效的沟通应优先考虑清晰性和可接近性，确保听众能够参与到所呈现的材料中。此外，verbalism也可能渗透到日常对话中。人们往往在简单的表达方式可以满足的情况下，诉诸于过于复杂的短语。例如，有人可能会说，'我目前正在评估我的选择的潜在影响'，而不是简单地说，'我在考虑我的选择'。这种倾向于沉迷于verbalism可能源于想要给他人留下深刻印象或看起来更有知识的愿望。然而，它有可能使听众失去兴趣，并稀释信息。此外，在写作的背景下，verbalism可能导致不必要的冗长。作者可能用过多的形容词和副词填充他们的论文或报告，这可能会削弱他们希望传达的主要观点。例如，一篇研究论文可能会陈述，'实验结果表明研究变量之间存在显著相关性'，而更直接的方式是，'实验显示了变量之间的强关联'。通过避免verbalism，作者可以提高其作品的可读性，并确保他们的论点得到有效呈现。verbalism的负面影响超出了个人互动；它们还可能影响更广泛的社会话语。在政治领域，例如，政治家可能会利用verbalism来逃避直接回答或掩盖其真实意图。这可能导致缺乏透明度和信任，因为选民可能会感到被复杂的修辞所误导，而这些修辞未能解决他们的关切。清晰和诚实的沟通对于建立关系和促进社区内的理解至关重要。总之，虽然语言的使用是表达的强大工具，但意识到verbalism的陷阱至关重要。在沟通中追求清晰和简单不仅增强理解，还促进个体之间的真诚联系。无论是在学术界、随意对话还是公共话语中，优先考虑简单性而非复杂性都可以导致更有效和有意义的交流。通过认识到对verbalism的倾向，并有意识地选择清晰沟通，我们可以为所有人创造一个更具包容性和吸引力的环境。