arrogate

简明释义

英[ˈærəɡeɪt]美[ˈærəɡeɪt]

v. <正式>攫取，篡夺

第 三 人 称 单 数 a r r o g a t e s

现 在 分 词 a r r o g a t i n g

过 去 式 a r r o g a t e d

过 去 分 词 a r r o g a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Remember that God sets us to our (His) tasks, and we dare not presume to arrogate any tasks to ourselves apart from Him.

记住是神给我们分配任务，我们怎敢离开神自立门户。

2.Don't arrogate wrong intentions to your colleagues.

不要硬说你同事们动机不良。

3.And who are you, then, that arrogate to yourself this tyrannical right over free and rational beings?

那么你认为你是谁，竟敢用这种暴虐的态度对待自由而理智的人？

4.At the same time, due to resource arrogate English in Asia, the only emu oil exporters.

同时，由于资源独揽，英吉利是亚洲唯一的鸸鹋油出口商。

5.In giving these Outlines I do not mean fellow-citizens to arrogate to myself the merit of the measures.

同胞们，我叙述了这些要点，并不是我要霸占这些措施的功绩。

6.Not arrogate to oneself professions9 see joke: My friendly mouth is stupid very, often say the footle that a few your people find both funny and annoying.

不擅表白9看笑话：我友的嘴甚是笨，常常说一些令人哭笑不得的呆话。

7.Not arrogate to oneself professions9 see joke: My friendly mouth is stupid very, often say the footle that a few your people find both funny and annoying.

不擅表白9看笑话：我友的嘴甚是笨，常常说一些令人哭笑不得的呆话。

8.I do not arrogate to myself the right to decide.

我不擅自决定。

9.In giving these Outlines I do not mean, fellow-citizens, to arrogate to myself the merit of the measures.

同胞们，我叙述了这些要点，并不是我要霸占这些措施的功绩。

10.The government should not arrogate 专横地夺取 the rights of its citizens.

政府不应<正在> arrogate 专横地夺取 公民的权利。

11.He tried to arrogate 自以为是地占有 the role of leader even though he was not elected.

尽管他没有被选为领导者，他还是试图<正在> arrogate 自以为是地占有 这个角色。

12.Some leaders arrogate 自作主张地获取 authority that belongs to others.

一些领导者<正在> arrogate 自作主张地获取 属于他人的权威。

13.The committee decided to arrogate 霸占 the powers of the board without any legal justification.

委员会决定<正在> arrogate 霸占 董事会的权力，毫无法律依据。

14.It is unethical to arrogate 强行夺取 someone else's ideas as your own.

强行夺取他人的想法作为自己的做法是不道德的。

作文

In recent years, the concept of authority has been increasingly scrutinized in various sectors, particularly in politics and corporate governance. One of the most concerning issues is when individuals or groups attempt to arrogate power that does not rightfully belong to them. This behavior can undermine the foundations of democratic institutions and lead to a breakdown in trust among citizens. When leaders arrogate authority, they often bypass established protocols and disregard the voices of the people they are meant to serve. This not only fosters an environment of fear and resentment but also sets a dangerous precedent for future governance.For instance, consider the case of a corporate executive who decides to arrogate decision-making powers without consulting their board of directors. Such actions can lead to disastrous consequences, as the executive may make choices based solely on personal interests rather than the company’s best interests. Employees may feel disempowered and unvalued, leading to decreased morale and productivity. Furthermore, stakeholders might lose confidence in the company’s leadership, resulting in financial losses and potential legal ramifications.Similarly, in the political realm, when politicians arrogate powers that exceed their mandates, it can lead to widespread public disillusionment. For instance, if a government official makes unilateral decisions regarding public policy without legislative approval, it raises questions about accountability and the rule of law. Citizens expect their leaders to act within the confines of their authority and to represent their interests. When this expectation is violated, it breeds cynicism and disengagement from the political process.The act of arrogating authority often stems from a desire for control or a belief that one knows better than others. However, this mindset is fundamentally flawed. Effective leadership requires collaboration, transparency, and respect for the democratic process. Leaders who genuinely seek to serve their constituents must recognize the importance of sharing power and engaging in open dialogue. By doing so, they not only enhance their credibility but also foster a culture of inclusivity and trust.Moreover, society at large must remain vigilant against the tendency to arrogate power. This vigilance can manifest through active participation in civic duties, such as voting, attending town hall meetings, and holding leaders accountable for their actions. Individuals should be encouraged to voice their opinions and challenge any attempts to undermine democratic principles. Education plays a crucial role in this process, as informed citizens are better equipped to recognize and resist efforts to arrogate authority.In conclusion, the act of arrogating power is a serious threat to both corporate and political environments. It disrupts the balance of authority and can have far-reaching implications for trust and stability. To combat this issue, it is essential for leaders to embrace collaborative practices and for citizens to remain engaged and informed. By fostering an atmosphere of shared responsibility, we can work towards a society that values democracy, accountability, and respect for all individuals. Only then can we ensure that power is exercised justly and equitably, without the shadow of arrogation looming over us.

近年来，权威的概念在各个领域，特别是在政治和公司治理中，受到越来越多的审视。一个最令人担忧的问题是，当个人或团体试图霸占不属于他们的权力时。这种行为可能会破坏民主制度的基础，并导致公民之间信任的崩溃。当领导者霸占权威时，他们通常会绕过既定的程序，忽视他们所服务的人民的声音。这不仅会造成恐惧和怨恨的环境，还会为未来的治理设定危险的先例。例如，考虑一个企业高管决定霸占决策权，而不咨询董事会。这样的行为可能导致灾难性的后果，因为高管可能仅根据个人利益做出选择，而不是公司的最佳利益。员工可能会感到无能为力和不被重视，从而导致士气和生产力下降。此外，利益相关者可能会对公司的领导失去信心，导致财务损失和潜在的法律后果。同样，在政治领域，当政治家霸占超出其授权的权力时，可能会导致公众广泛的失望。例如，如果一位政府官员在没有立法批准的情况下单方面做出关于公共政策的决定，就会引发关于问责制和法治的问题。公民期望他们的领导者在其权力范围内行事，并代表他们的利益。当这一期望被违反时，会滋生愤世嫉俗和对政治过程的疏离。霸占权力的行为往往源于对控制的渴望或认为自己比他人更了解。然而，这种心态根本上是错误的。有效的领导需要合作、透明和对民主过程的尊重。真正寻求为其选民服务的领导者必须认识到共享权力和进行公开对话的重要性。通过这样做，他们不仅增强了自己的信誉，还培养了包容和信任的文化。此外，整个社会必须对霸占权力的倾向保持警惕。这种警惕可以通过积极参与公民职责来体现，例如投票、参加市政厅会议和对领导者的行为进行问责。应鼓励个人表达意见，并挑战任何试图破坏民主原则的行为。教育在这个过程中发挥着至关重要的作用，因为受过教育的公民更能识别和抵制霸占权力的努力。总之，霸占权力的行为对企业和政治环境都是一种严重威胁。它打乱了权力的平衡，并可能对信任和稳定产生深远的影响。为了应对这一问题，领导者必须接受合作实践，公民必须保持参与和知情。通过营造共享责任的氛围，我们可以朝着一个重视民主、问责和尊重所有个体的社会迈进。只有这样，我们才能确保权力的行使是公正和公平的，而不会有霸占的阴影笼罩着我们。