entry into force requirment

简明释义

生效要求

英英释义

例句

1.The entry into force requirement states that a minimum of 50 countries must sign the document.

该生效要求规定至少需要50个国家签署该文件。

2.We need to ensure compliance with the entry into force requirement to avoid legal issues.

我们需要确保遵守生效要求以避免法律问题。

3.Before the entry into force requirement can be met, all member states must ratify the treaty.

在满足生效要求之前，所有成员国必须批准该条约。

4.The entry into force requirement was delayed due to unforeseen circumstances.

由于不可预见的情况，生效要求被推迟。

5.The entry into force requirement for the new trade agreement is set for January 1, 2024.

新贸易协议的生效要求定于2024年1月1日。

作文

The concept of entry into force requirement is crucial in the realm of international law and agreements. This term refers to the specific conditions that must be met for a treaty or agreement to become legally binding and enforceable. Understanding this requirement is essential for nations and organizations involved in diplomatic negotiations and treaty-making processes. When countries come together to negotiate a treaty, they often outline various terms and conditions that need to be fulfilled before the treaty can take effect. These terms can include the ratification by a certain number of signatory states or the fulfillment of specific legislative procedures within each country. The entry into force requirement serves as a safeguard, ensuring that all parties are adequately prepared and committed to the obligations set forth in the agreement. For instance, consider the Paris Agreement on climate change, which includes an entry into force requirement stipulating that at least 55 countries representing at least 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions must ratify the agreement for it to become effective. This requirement was designed to ensure that the agreement would have significant impact and participation from major emitting countries. The importance of the entry into force requirement cannot be overstated. It plays a vital role in the legitimacy and effectiveness of international treaties. Without such requirements, treaties could be enacted without the necessary support and commitment from the participating nations, leading to ineffective or unenforceable agreements. Furthermore, these requirements help to build trust among nations, as they indicate a collective willingness to adhere to the agreed-upon terms. In addition to international treaties, the entry into force requirement is also relevant in domestic legislation. For example, when a new law is passed, it may not take effect immediately. Instead, there might be a specified date or additional conditions that must be met before the law is officially implemented. This allows for a smoother transition and gives individuals and organizations time to adjust to the new legal framework. Moreover, the entry into force requirement can vary significantly depending on the nature of the agreement or legislation. Some treaties may require immediate implementation, while others may allow for a grace period during which countries can make the necessary adjustments to comply with the new rules. This flexibility is important as it acknowledges the diverse political and legal systems of different countries. In conclusion, the entry into force requirement is a fundamental aspect of both international and domestic law. It ensures that treaties and laws are only enacted when appropriate conditions are met, fostering a sense of responsibility and commitment among participating parties. As global challenges continue to evolve, understanding and adhering to these requirements will be essential for effective cooperation and governance on both national and international levels. By recognizing the significance of the entry into force requirement, we can better appreciate the complexities of legal agreements and the importance of mutual respect among nations. Overall, the entry into force requirement is not just a bureaucratic hurdle; it is a critical mechanism that upholds the integrity of international relations and domestic governance, paving the way for meaningful collaboration and progress.

‘生效要求’这一概念在国际法和协议领域至关重要。这个术语指的是必须满足的特定条件，以使条约或协议具有法律约束力并可执行。理解这一要求对参与外交谈判和条约制定过程的国家和组织至关重要。当国家聚集在一起谈判条约时，他们通常会列出在条约生效之前需要满足的各种条款和条件。这些条款可能包括由一定数量的签署国进行批准，或各国内部需要履行特定的立法程序。‘生效要求’作为一种保障，确保所有各方都充分准备好并承诺遵守协议中规定的义务。例如，考虑一下《巴黎协定》关于气候变化的内容，其中包括一项‘生效要求’，规定至少55个国家代表至少55%的全球温室气体排放量必须批准该协议，以使其生效。这个要求旨在确保协议将对主要排放国产生显著影响和参与。‘生效要求’的重要性不容小觑。它在国际条约的合法性和有效性中发挥着至关重要的作用。如果没有这样的要求，条约可能会在缺乏必要支持和参与国家承诺的情况下生效，从而导致无效或无法执行的协议。此外，这些要求有助于在国家之间建立信任，因为它们表明各方集体愿意遵守商定的条款。除了国际条约外，‘生效要求’在国内立法中也相关。例如，当一项新法律通过时，它可能不会立即生效。相反，可能会有一个指定的日期或额外的条件，必须满足这些条件后法律才能正式实施。这允许更平稳的过渡，并给个人和组织时间来适应新的法律框架。此外，‘生效要求’的具体内容可能因协议或立法的性质而有很大不同。有些条约可能要求立即实施，而其他条约则可能允许在国家进行必要调整以遵守新规则的宽限期。这种灵活性很重要，因为它承认不同国家的政治和法律体系的多样性。总之，‘生效要求’是国际法和国内法的基本方面。它确保只有在适当条件得到满足时，条约和法律才会生效，从而在参与方之间培养了一种责任感和承诺感。随着全球挑战的不断演变，理解和遵守这些要求对于在国家和国际层面上有效合作和治理至关重要。通过认识到‘生效要求’的重要性，我们可以更好地欣赏法律协议的复杂性以及各国之间相互尊重的重要性。总的来说，‘生效要求’不仅仅是一个官僚障碍；它是维护国际关系和国内治理完整性的关键机制，为有意义的合作与进步铺平了道路。