nominally

简明释义

英[ˈnɒmɪnəli]美[ˈnɑːmɪnəli]

adv. 名义上地；有名无实地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Most of the rest is nominally federal land, but in practice is up for grabs: title deeds are forged, people are killed and deforestation accelerates because of competing claims.

剩下的所谓联邦土地却实际是可以公开投标的：产权证书是伪造的，有人因此被杀，而森林的砍伐速度却因产权争夺而加快了。

2.Tomorrowland, a section of the Disneyland theme park that nominally reflects the world of the future, is a vivid example of how our views of the future have changed over time.

“明日世界”是迪斯尼主题公园的一个园区，从名称来看它应该反映未来世界的模样。要证明我们对未来的看法是如何随时间而变化的，它可以作为一个很好的例子。

3.He was nominally in charge of the company.

他名义上管理着这家公司。

4.Barca's current roaming front three of Messi, Pedro and David Villa are nominally wingers, and even Villa, the "striker" brought in from Valencia, often plays in a wide position.

巴萨目前的前场三叉戟梅西、佩德罗和比利亚名义上是边锋，即使是以“前锋”名义引进的瓦伦西亚球员比利亚，也经常游弋于各个位置。

5.Even researchers who nominally put their calculations in the public domain rarely were effective, because they lack expertise in the computing crafts that bear on portability and deployment.

即使对于那些在名义上将他们的计算结果公布于众的研究人员来说，也没有什么用处，因为他们在可移植性和部署等相关计算技巧方面缺乏专业技能。

6.In 1945 China emerged from the war nominally a great military power but was actually a nation economically prostrated and on the verge of all-out civil war.

1945年，中国名义上是一个军事大国，但实际上不过是一个不但经济濒临崩溃还处于全面内战爆发边缘的国家。

7.The company is nominally 名义上 a leader in the industry, but its market share has been declining.

这家公司在行业中名义上是领导者，但其市场份额一直在下降。

8.She holds a nominally 名义上 prestigious position at the university, but she rarely teaches.

她在大学担任一个名义上声望很高的职位，但她很少授课。

9.The treaty was nominally 名义上 signed by both countries, yet it has not been implemented.

该条约名义上由两国签署，但尚未实施。

10.The project was nominally 名义上 funded by the government, but most of the money came from private investors.

这个项目名义上由政府资助，但大部分资金来自私人投资者。

11.He is nominally 名义上 the manager, but his team makes most of the decisions.

他名义上是经理，但他的团队做大部分决策。

作文

In today's world, many organizations and institutions operate under various structures that can sometimes be misleading. One such term that often arises in discussions about governance and management is 'nominally'. When we say that an organization is *nominally* governed by a board of directors, we imply that the board exists in name but may not have real power or influence over the organization's operations. This distinction is crucial in understanding how organizations function in reality versus how they are perceived to function. For instance, consider a large corporation with a board of directors that is *nominally* responsible for making high-level decisions. In theory, the board should guide the company’s strategy and ensure accountability. However, in practice, the day-to-day operations may be controlled by a small group of executives who have little regard for the board's input. Thus, while the board is *nominally* in charge, its effectiveness is often undermined by the actual power dynamics within the organization.This phenomenon is not limited to corporations; it can also be observed in government structures. A country might be *nominally* democratic, with elections and representatives, yet the real decision-making power may lie with a ruling elite or a single leader. In such cases, the democratic processes are often mere formalities, and the citizens' voices are drowned out by those who wield actual control. This disparity between nominal authority and real power raises important questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of governance.Moreover, the term *nominally* can also apply to various social roles and titles. For example, a person may hold the title of manager *nominally*, but if they lack the authority to make significant decisions or influence their team's direction, their role is largely symbolic. This situation can lead to frustration among employees who seek guidance and leadership from someone who does not possess the necessary power to effect change.Understanding the implications of being *nominally* in charge is vital for anyone looking to navigate complex organizational or governmental landscapes. It prompts individuals to look beyond titles and formal structures to assess where real power lies. In doing so, they can better understand the dynamics at play and position themselves accordingly. In conclusion, while the term *nominally* suggests a level of authority or responsibility, it is essential to recognize that this authority can be superficial. Whether in corporate settings, government institutions, or social hierarchies, the distinction between nominal and actual power is significant. By being aware of these nuances, individuals can make more informed decisions and engage more effectively within their organizations and communities. Ultimately, recognizing that something is *nominally* true often leads to deeper insights about the realities of power and influence in our world.

在当今世界，许多组织和机构在各种结构下运作，这些结构有时可能具有误导性。一个经常出现在关于治理和管理讨论中的术语是“nominally”。当我们说一个组织*名义上*由董事会治理时，我们暗示该董事会存在于名义上，但可能对组织的运作没有真正的权力或影响。这种区别对于理解组织在现实中如何运作与它们被认为如何运作至关重要。例如，考虑一个大型公司，其董事会*名义上*负责做出高层决策。从理论上讲，董事会应该指导公司的战略并确保问责。然而，在实践中，日常运营可能由一小群高管控制，他们对董事会的意见不屑一顾。因此，虽然董事会*名义上*掌握着权力，但其有效性往往受到组织内部实际权力动态的削弱。这种现象不仅限于公司；在政府结构中也可以观察到。一个国家可能*名义上*是民主的，拥有选举和代表，但真正的决策权可能掌握在统治精英或单一领导者手中。在这种情况下，民主程序往往只是形式，而公民的声音则被真正掌握控制权的人淹没。这种名义权威与真实权力之间的差距引发了有关治理合法性和有效性的重要问题。此外，术语*名义上*也可以应用于各种社会角色和头衔。例如，一个人可能*名义上*担任经理，但如果他们缺乏作出重大决策或影响团队方向的权力，他们的角色在很大程度上是象征性的。这种情况可能导致员工的挫败感，他们希望从一个没有必要权力来推动变革的人那里获得指导和领导。理解*名义上*掌控的含义对于任何希望在复杂的组织或政府环境中导航的人来说都是至关重要的。这促使个人超越头衔和正式结构，评估真正的权力所在。这样，他们可以更好地理解正在进行的动态，并相应地定位自己。总之，虽然术语*名义上*暗示了一定程度的权威或责任，但认识到这种权威可能是肤浅的至关重要。无论是在企业环境、政府机构还是社会等级中，名义权力与实际权力之间的区别都是显著的。通过意识到这些细微差别，个人可以做出更明智的决策，并在其组织和社区中更有效地参与。最终，认识到某事是*名义上*真实的，往往会导致对我们世界中权力和影响现实的更深刻洞察。