realpolitik

简明释义

英[reɪˈɑːlpɒlɪtiːk]美[reɪˈɑːlpɑːlɪtiːk]

n. 现实政治；权力政治；实力政策

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mr Baker is one of the most distinguished practitioners of the Kissingerian school of realpolitik.

贝克先生是一位杰出的，基辛格实力派政策代表着。

2.Mr Baker is one of the most distinguished practitioners of the Kissingerian school of realpolitik.

贝克先生是一位杰出的，基辛格实力派政策代表着。

3.Critics argue that realpolitik can lead to unethical decisions in the name of pragmatism.

批评者认为，现实政治可能会以务实的名义导致不道德的决定。

4.Many leaders prefer realpolitik because it focuses on practical outcomes rather than moral considerations.

许多领导人更喜欢现实政治，因为它关注实际结果而非道德考量。

5.The government adopted a strategy of realpolitik to navigate the complex international relations.

政府采取了现实政治的策略来应对复杂的国际关系。

6.In his speech, the politician emphasized the need for realpolitik over idealism in foreign policy.

在他的演讲中，政治家强调在外交政策中需要以现实政治取代理想主义。

7.The shift towards realpolitik has changed the dynamics of the negotiation process.

向现实政治的转变改变了谈判过程的动态。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term realpolitik refers to a pragmatic approach that emphasizes practical considerations over ideological or ethical ones. It is derived from the German words 'real' meaning 'realistic' and 'politik' meaning 'politics'. This concept has been a significant aspect of political discourse, especially in the context of international relations, where leaders often face complex situations that require them to prioritize national interests over moral imperatives.Historically, realpolitik emerged in the 19th century, notably associated with the policies of Otto von Bismarck, the Chancellor of Germany. Bismarck's diplomatic strategies exemplified realpolitik as he skillfully maneuvered through European politics, focusing on power dynamics rather than ideological commitments. His actions, such as the unification of Germany and the establishment of various alliances, were driven by a clear understanding of the geopolitical landscape rather than adherence to any specific political doctrine.The essence of realpolitik lies in its rejection of idealism. Idealists often believe that diplomacy should be guided by moral principles and universal values. However, realpolitik advocates argue that such ideals can lead to naivety and failure in the harsh realities of global politics. For instance, during the Cold War, many leaders adopted realpolitik to navigate the complexities of superpower rivalry, often making compromises that prioritized stability and security over democratic ideals.In contemporary politics, the relevance of realpolitik remains evident. Leaders around the world frequently face dilemmas where they must choose between ethical considerations and the practical needs of their nations. For example, a government may engage with authoritarian regimes to secure trade deals or military alliances, even if it means overlooking human rights abuses. This pragmatic approach can be controversial, as it raises questions about the moral responsibilities of nations in a globalized world.Critics of realpolitik argue that this approach can lead to short-sightedness and a lack of accountability. They contend that prioritizing power and interests over ethics can undermine trust in international relations and foster resentment among populations affected by such policies. Additionally, the reliance on realpolitik can perpetuate cycles of conflict, as nations may act in self-interest without consideration for the broader implications of their actions.Nevertheless, proponents of realpolitik assert that it is a necessary framework for understanding the complexities of global politics. They argue that in an increasingly interconnected world, leaders must make difficult choices that balance moral aspirations with the realities of power dynamics. For instance, in addressing climate change, countries may need to collaborate with nations that do not share their environmental values to achieve meaningful progress.In conclusion, realpolitik is a critical concept in political theory that encapsulates the tension between ethics and pragmatism in governance. While it offers a realistic lens through which to view international relations, it also challenges us to consider the moral implications of our choices. As global challenges continue to evolve, the debate surrounding realpolitik will undoubtedly remain a vital part of political discourse, urging leaders to find a balance between pragmatic decision-making and ethical responsibility.

现实政治在政治领域中指的是一种务实的方法，强调实践考虑而非意识形态或道德上的因素。这个词源于德语，'real' 意为“现实的”，而 'politik' 意为“政治”。这一概念在政治话语中占有重要地位，尤其是在国际关系的背景下，领导者常常面临复杂的情况，要求他们优先考虑国家利益，而非道德义务。历史上，现实政治在19世纪出现，尤其与德国总理奥托·冯·俾斯麦的政策相关。俾斯麦的外交策略体现了现实政治，因为他巧妙地在欧洲政治中游走，关注权力动态，而不是意识形态承诺。他的行动，如德国的统一和各种联盟的建立，是基于对地缘政治格局的清晰理解，而不是遵循任何特定的政治学说。现实政治的本质在于它拒绝理想主义。理想主义者通常认为，外交应当以道德原则和普世价值为指导。然而，现实政治的倡导者则认为，这种理想可能导致天真和在全球政治的严酷现实中的失败。例如，在冷战期间，许多领导者采用现实政治来应对超级大国竞争的复杂性，往往做出妥协，以优先考虑稳定和安全，而非民主理想。在当代政治中，现实政治的相关性依然明显。世界各国的领导者经常面临困境，必须在伦理考量与国家实际需求之间作出选择。例如，一个政府可能会与专制政权进行接触，以确保贸易协议或军事联盟，即使这意味着忽视人权侵犯。这种务实的方法可能引发争议，因为它提出了全球化世界中国家的道德责任问题。然而，现实政治的支持者主张，这是一种理解全球政治复杂性的必要框架。他们认为，在一个日益相互联系的世界中，领导者必须做出艰难的选择，平衡道德愿望与权力动态的现实。例如，在应对气候变化时，各国可能需要与不共享其环境价值观的国家合作，以实现有意义的进展。总之，现实政治是政治理论中的一个关键概念，概括了治理中伦理与务实之间的紧张关系。虽然它提供了一种现实的视角来看待国际关系，但它也挑战我们考虑选择的道德影响。随着全球挑战的不断演变，围绕现实政治的辩论无疑将继续成为政治话语的重要组成部分，促使领导者在务实决策与伦理责任之间找到平衡。