ukase

简明释义

英[juˈkeɪs]美[juˈkeɪs]

n. 谕旨；敕令；法令

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.For him the concept, the history, the meaning of law made it a diktat, a ukase, a cold threat, a decree.

在他的概念和对历史的理解里面，法律是绝对的命令、是谕旨、是冷酷的威胁，是判决。

2.For him the concept, the history, the meaning of law made it a diktat, a ukase, a cold threat, a decree.

在他的概念和对历史的理解里面，法律是绝对的命令、是谕旨、是冷酷的威胁，是判决。

3.In response to public outcry, the mayor's office released an ukase 命令 to address the concerns.

为了回应公众的抗议，市长办公室发布了一项命令以解决这些问题。

4.The government issued a new ukase 法令 that changed the tax regulations.

政府发布了一项新的法令，改变了税收规定。

5.The CEO's ukase 指令 to cut costs was met with resistance from employees.

首席执行官的指令削减成本遭到了员工的抵制。

6.A sudden ukase 法令 from the central bank shocked the financial markets.

中央银行突然发布的法令震惊了金融市场。

7.The school board announced an ukase 决议 to extend the school year by two weeks.

学校董事会宣布了一项决议，将学年延长两周。

作文

In the realm of governance and authority, the term ukase refers to a decree or authoritative order issued by a high-ranking official, particularly in Russian contexts. This concept is not only significant in political discussions but also serves as a lens through which we can examine the nature of power and its implications on society. The historical usage of ukase can be traced back to the Russian Empire, where such decrees were often employed by emperors to enforce laws or enact policies without the need for legislative approval. This practice underscores a critical aspect of autocratic rule, where decisions can be made unilaterally, reflecting the concentration of power in the hands of a few.The implications of an ukase extend beyond mere governance; they resonate deeply within the fabric of society, influencing everything from individual freedoms to economic structures. For instance, when a leader issues an ukase that mandates certain economic reforms, it can lead to significant shifts in market dynamics, often with little regard for public opinion or the potential consequences on the populace. Such actions can foster resentment among citizens who feel their voices are being silenced by the heavy hand of authority.Moreover, the modern interpretation of ukase has evolved, especially in contexts where governments employ similar tactics to impose regulations or restrictions. In recent years, we have witnessed instances where leaders around the world have issued orders that resemble the traditional ukase, bypassing democratic processes and igniting debates about the legitimacy of such actions. This raises important questions about the balance between authority and democracy, as well as the role of citizens in shaping their governance.The historical context of ukase is also crucial for understanding its impact on culture and identity. In many cases, these decrees have been used to promote nationalistic agendas, often at the expense of minority rights. For example, an ukase that emphasizes a singular national identity may marginalize diverse cultures and languages, leading to social tensions and conflicts. This highlights the potential dangers of centralized power and the need for checks and balances in any governance system.In conclusion, the term ukase encapsulates the complexities of authority and governance. It serves as a reminder of the potential for power to be wielded in ways that can either uplift or oppress societies. As we navigate the challenges of modern governance, it is essential to critically evaluate the use of such decrees and their broader implications on democracy, individual rights, and social cohesion. Understanding the historical significance and contemporary relevance of ukase enables us to engage more thoughtfully in discussions about power, authority, and the role of citizens in shaping their futures.

在治理和权威的领域中，术语ukase指的是由高层官员发布的法令或权威命令，特别是在俄罗斯的背景下。这个概念不仅在政治讨论中具有重要意义，还为我们审视权力的本质及其对社会的影响提供了一个视角。ukase的历史用法可以追溯到俄罗斯帝国，当时这样的法令常常被皇帝用来执行法律或实施政策，而无需立法批准。这一做法突显了专制统治的一个关键方面，即决策可以单方面作出，反映出权力集中在少数人手中的现象。ukase的影响不仅限于治理；它深刻地影响着社会的各个方面，从个人自由到经济结构。例如，当领导者发布一项ukase，要求某些经济改革时，这可能会导致市场动态的重大变化，往往不顾公众意见或对民众潜在后果的考虑。这类行为可能会在公民中引发怨恨，因为他们感到自己的声音被权威的重压所淹没。此外，现代对ukase的解释也在不断演变，尤其是在政府采取类似策略以强加法规或限制的背景下。近年来，我们目睹了世界各地的领导人发布的命令，类似于传统的ukase，绕过民主程序，引发了关于此类行为合法性的辩论。这引发了关于权威与民主之间平衡的重要问题，以及公民在塑造治理中的角色。ukase的历史背景对于理解其对文化和身份的影响也至关重要。在许多情况下，这些法令被用来推动民族主义议程，往往以牺牲少数民族权利为代价。例如，强调单一国家身份的ukase可能会边缘化多元文化和语言，导致社会紧张和冲突。这突显了集权权力的潜在危险，以及任何治理系统中检查和平衡的必要性。总之，术语ukase概括了权威和治理的复杂性。它提醒我们，权力有可能以提升或压迫社会的方式行使。在我们应对现代治理挑战时，批判性地评估此类法令的使用及其对民主、个人权利和社会凝聚力的更广泛影响是至关重要的。理解ukase的历史意义和当代相关性，使我们能够更有思想地参与关于权力、权威以及公民在塑造未来中的角色的讨论。