disposition without trial

简明释义

不经审判的处分

英英释义

例句

1.In many civil cases, parties may reach a disposition without trial to save time and resources.

在许多民事案件中，各方可能会达成不经过审判的处置以节省时间和资源。

2.The judge decided on a disposition without trial to expedite the case.

法官决定采取不经过审判的处置以加快案件进程。

3.The defendant accepted a plea deal as a form of disposition without trial.

被告接受了认罪协议，作为一种不经过审判的处置。

4.The attorney advised his client that a disposition without trial could lead to a quicker resolution.

律师建议他的客户，不经过审判的处置可以更快地解决问题。

5.After negotiations, they reached a disposition without trial that satisfied both parties.

经过谈判，他们达成了一个令双方满意的不经过审判的处置。

作文

The legal system is a complex web of rules and procedures designed to ensure justice is served. One of the critical aspects of this system is the concept of a disposition without trial, which refers to resolving a case without going through a full court trial. This method can take various forms, including plea bargains, settlements, or dismissals. Understanding this term is essential for anyone navigating the legal landscape, as it can significantly impact the outcomes for both defendants and plaintiffs.A disposition without trial often occurs when parties involved in a legal dispute seek a quicker resolution. For instance, in criminal cases, a defendant may agree to plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a lighter sentence. This plea bargain not only saves time but also reduces the burden on the court system, allowing judges and juries to focus on more serious cases. Similarly, in civil cases, parties may reach a settlement agreement, where they decide to resolve their disputes outside of court, often leading to a mutually beneficial outcome.However, while disposition without trial can streamline the legal process, it is not without its criticisms. Critics argue that it may pressure defendants into accepting deals that do not serve their best interests, especially if they feel overwhelmed by the complexities of a trial. Additionally, there are concerns that this practice might lead to injustices, as some individuals may feel compelled to plead guilty to crimes they did not commit simply to avoid the uncertainties and potential harsher penalties associated with a trial.Moreover, the implications of a disposition without trial extend beyond individual cases. The prevalence of such resolutions can affect public perception of the legal system. When people see many cases resolved without trials, they may question whether justice is truly being served. Are defendants receiving fair treatment? Are victims getting the justice they deserve? These questions highlight the delicate balance that must be maintained within the legal framework to uphold the principles of justice while also ensuring efficiency.In conclusion, the concept of disposition without trial plays a significant role in the legal system, offering a means to resolve disputes more efficiently. While it has its advantages, it also raises important ethical considerations that must be addressed. Legal professionals, defendants, and plaintiffs alike should be aware of the implications of choosing this route, as it can have lasting effects on their lives and the broader justice system. Ultimately, understanding the nuances of disposition without trial is crucial in fostering a more informed perspective on how justice is administered in our society.

法律系统是一个复杂的规则和程序网络，旨在确保公正得到实施。其中一个关键方面是“不经过审判的处置”这一概念，指的是在没有经过完整法庭审判的情况下解决案件。这种方法可以采取多种形式，包括认罪交易、和解或驳回。理解这个术语对任何在法律领域中摸索的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它可能会显著影响被告和原告的结果。“不经过审判的处置”通常发生在涉及法律争议的各方寻求更快解决方案时。例如，在刑事案件中，被告可能同意对较轻的指控认罪，以换取更轻的判决。这种认罪交易不仅节省了时间，还减轻了法院系统的负担，使法官和陪审团能够集中精力处理更严重的案件。类似地，在民事案件中，各方可能达成和解协议，决定在法庭外解决争端，通常会导致双方都能接受的结果。然而，尽管“不经过审判的处置”可以简化法律程序，但它并非没有批评。批评者认为，这可能迫使被告接受对他们最佳利益不利的交易，尤其是当他们感到被审判的复杂性所压倒时。此外，还有人担心这种做法可能导致不公正，因为一些人可能感到被迫对他们没有犯下的罪行认罪，只是为了避免与审判相关的不确定性和潜在更严厉的惩罚。此外，“不经过审判的处置”的影响超越个案。此类解决方案的普遍存在可能影响公众对法律系统的看法。当人们看到许多案件在没有审判的情况下解决时，他们可能会质疑是否真正实现了公正。被告是否得到了公平的对待？受害者是否得到了应有的正义？这些问题突显了在法律框架中必须保持的微妙平衡，以维护公正的原则，同时确保效率。总之，“不经过审判的处置”的概念在法律系统中发挥着重要作用，提供了一种更有效地解决争端的方法。虽然它有其优点，但也提出了必须解决的重要伦理考虑。法律专业人士、被告和原告都应该意识到选择这一路径的影响，因为这可能对他们的生活和更广泛的司法系统产生持久的影响。最终，理解“不经过审判的处置”的细微差别对于培养对我们社会中如何实施正义的更知情的看法至关重要。