dishing settlement

简明释义

碟状沉陷

英英释义

例句

1.The company opted for a dishing settlement rather than taking the case to court, saving time and resources.

公司选择了dishing settlement而不是将案件提交法庭，从而节省了时间和资源。

2.The dishing settlement included a financial payout and an agreement to cease all further disputes.

这项dishing settlement包括一笔财务赔偿和停止所有进一步争议的协议。

3.During the mediation session, the focus was on finding a workable dishing settlement for both sides.

在调解会议上，重点是为双方找到一个可行的dishing settlement。

4.After months of negotiations, both parties finally agreed to a dishing settlement that satisfied their needs.

经过数月的谈判，双方最终达成了一项满足他们需求的dishing settlement。

5.The lawyer explained the terms of the dishing settlement to his client, emphasizing that it was a fair compromise.

律师向客户解释了dishing settlement的条款，强调这是一个公平的妥协。

作文

The concept of dishing settlement is often encountered in various contexts, particularly in legal and financial discussions. In essence, a dishing settlement refers to an agreement reached between parties involved in a dispute, where the terms are laid out clearly, and each party agrees to the conditions set forth. This term is especially relevant in scenarios where litigation could be lengthy and costly, making a settlement an attractive option for both sides.In the realm of law, a dishing settlement can save time and resources. For instance, consider a scenario where two companies are embroiled in a patent dispute. Instead of pursuing a protracted court battle, which could take years and drain financial resources, they might opt for a dishing settlement. In this settlement, both parties would negotiate terms that could include monetary compensation, licensing agreements, or even collaborative ventures. By doing so, they not only resolve their differences but also maintain a professional relationship that could benefit them in the future.Moreover, dishing settlement is not limited to corporate disputes; it is also prevalent in personal injury cases, divorce proceedings, and other civil matters. For example, in a personal injury case, the injured party may agree to a dishing settlement with the insurance company, receiving a lump sum payment in exchange for dropping the lawsuit. This can provide immediate financial relief to the injured party while allowing the insurance company to avoid the uncertainty of a trial.The advantages of a dishing settlement are manifold. Firstly, it provides certainty for both parties. In a trial, the outcome can be unpredictable, but a settlement allows both parties to have a say in the resolution. Secondly, it can be less expensive than going through the court system. Legal fees can accumulate quickly, and a settlement can mitigate these costs. Lastly, it can be a quicker resolution. Trials can take months or even years, whereas a dishing settlement can often be reached within weeks.However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider. One major concern is that a dishing settlement may not fully address the grievances of one party, leading to lingering resentment or dissatisfaction. For instance, if a party feels pressured to accept a settlement due to financial constraints, they may later regret not pursuing their case in court.Additionally, the confidentiality of a dishing settlement can sometimes prevent important information from being disclosed. In some cases, settlements may include non-disclosure agreements that prevent the parties from discussing the details of the agreement publicly. While this can protect sensitive information, it can also limit transparency, especially in cases that may have broader implications for public safety or consumer rights.In conclusion, understanding the term dishing settlement is crucial for anyone navigating disputes, whether in business, personal matters, or legal contexts. It represents a pragmatic approach to conflict resolution, offering a pathway to agreement without the need for prolonged litigation. While it has its advantages, such as saving time and costs, it is essential for parties to carefully consider the terms of any settlement to ensure that their interests are adequately represented and protected. As society continues to evolve, the concept of dishing settlement will likely remain a significant aspect of how we resolve conflicts efficiently and effectively.

“dishing settlement”这个概念常常在各种背景下出现，尤其是在法律和金融讨论中。其本质上是指当事人之间达成的协议，其中明确列出了条款，每一方都同意所列条件。这个术语在诉讼可能漫长而昂贵的情况下尤其相关，使得和解成为双方的一个吸引人的选择。在法律领域，dishing settlement可以节省时间和资源。例如，考虑一个场景，两家公司因专利争议而纠缠不清。与其进行一场可能耗时数年且消耗财务资源的漫长法庭斗争，它们可能选择进行dishing settlement。在这项和解中，双方将协商包括货币赔偿、许可协议甚至合作项目等条款。通过这样做，他们不仅解决了分歧，还维护了可能在未来对他们有利的专业关系。此外，dishing settlement并不限于企业争议；它在个人伤害案件、离婚程序和其他民事事务中也很普遍。例如，在个人伤害案件中，受伤方可能会与保险公司达成dishing settlement，以一次性支付的方式换取撤回诉讼。这可以为受伤方提供即时的财务救济，同时使保险公司避免试验的不确定性。dishing settlement的优势多种多样。首先，它为双方提供了确定性。在审判中，结果可能不可预测，但和解允许双方在解决方案中都有发言权。其次，它可能比通过法院系统更便宜。法律费用可能迅速增加，而和解可以减少这些成本。最后，它可以更快地解决问题。审判可能需要数月或甚至数年，而dishing settlement通常可以在几周内达成。然而，也有潜在的缺点需要考虑。一个主要的担忧是，dishing settlement可能无法完全解决一方的投诉，导致持续的怨恨或不满。例如，如果一方因财务压力感到被迫接受和解，他们可能会在后期后悔没有在法庭上追求他们的案件。此外，dishing settlement的保密性有时可能会阻止重要信息的披露。在某些情况下，和解可能包括不披露协议，禁止各方公开讨论协议的细节。虽然这可以保护敏感信息，但在可能对公共安全或消费者权益产生更广泛影响的案件中，它也可能限制透明度。总之，理解dishing settlement这一术语对于任何在商业、个人事务或法律背景中应对争端的人来说都是至关重要的。它代表了一种务实的冲突解决方法，提供了一条无需长期诉讼的协议途径。虽然它有节省时间和成本等优势，但各方必须仔细考虑任何和解的条款，以确保他们的利益得到充分代表和保护。随着社会的不断发展，dishing settlement的概念可能仍将是我们有效和高效解决冲突的重要方面。