diplomatic asylum

简明释义

外交庇护

英英释义

例句

1.The ambassador discussed the implications of granting diplomatic asylum 外交庇护 to the defectors.

大使讨论了向叛逃者提供diplomatic asylum 外交庇护的影响。

2.The government granted diplomatic asylum 外交庇护 to the journalist who exposed corruption.

政府向揭露腐败的记者提供了diplomatic asylum 外交庇护。

3.The political dissident sought diplomatic asylum 外交庇护 in the embassy after fleeing his home country.

这位政治异议人士在逃离祖国后寻求了大使馆的diplomatic asylum 外交庇护。

4.After receiving threats, she decided to apply for diplomatic asylum 外交庇护 in a foreign country.

在收到威胁后，她决定申请在一个外国获得diplomatic asylum 外交庇护。

5.Many refugees turn to diplomatic asylum 外交庇护 as a last resort to escape persecution.

许多难民将diplomatic asylum 外交庇护作为逃避迫害的最后手段。

作文

In today’s world, the concept of asylum is crucial for protecting individuals fleeing persecution. One specific form of this protection is known as diplomatic asylum, which refers to the sanctuary granted by a country to foreign nationals who seek refuge in its diplomatic missions. This practice has significant implications for international relations and human rights. diplomatic asylum (外交庇护) is not just a matter of providing shelter; it involves complex legal and political considerations that can affect bilateral ties between countries.Historically, diplomatic asylum has been utilized in various instances where individuals faced threats in their home countries. For example, during the Cold War, many dissidents sought refuge in embassies, hoping to escape oppressive regimes. This form of asylum allows the host country to offer protection while also navigating the delicate balance of international diplomacy. The granting of diplomatic asylum can sometimes lead to tensions between nations, particularly if the asylum seeker is viewed as a criminal or a traitor by their home government.The process of seeking diplomatic asylum typically begins when an individual approaches a diplomatic mission, such as an embassy or consulate, and requests protection. The host country must then evaluate the legitimacy of the request, considering factors like the individual's safety, the nature of the threats they face, and the potential repercussions on diplomatic relations. This evaluation is not straightforward, as it often involves a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the asylum seeker’s situation.Moreover, the rules governing diplomatic asylum are not universally agreed upon, leading to varying practices across different countries. Some nations have established clear legal frameworks for granting asylum, while others rely on customary practices or political considerations. This lack of standardization can create confusion and complicate the asylum process, making it essential for both asylum seekers and host countries to understand their rights and responsibilities.One notable case of diplomatic asylum occurred in 2012 when Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, sought refuge in the Embassy of Ecuador in London. His case highlighted the political ramifications of granting asylum, as it drew significant media attention and sparked debates about freedom of speech, government transparency, and the limits of diplomatic immunity. The situation exemplified how diplomatic asylum can become a focal point in international relations, influencing public opinion and state policies.The implications of diplomatic asylum extend beyond individual cases; they also raise important questions about the responsibilities of countries to protect human rights. Nations that provide asylum often position themselves as champions of human rights, while those that refuse to grant it may face criticism for failing to uphold international norms. This dynamic can create pressure on governments to respond to asylum requests, particularly when the cases attract widespread attention.In conclusion, diplomatic asylum plays a vital role in the landscape of international law and human rights. It serves as a lifeline for individuals escaping persecution, but it also presents challenges for diplomatic relations. As global conflicts continue to arise, the importance of understanding and navigating the complexities of diplomatic asylum will only grow. Countries must balance their commitment to human rights with the realities of international politics, ensuring that they uphold their obligations while maintaining stable relations with other nations.

在当今世界，庇护的概念对于保护逃避迫害的个人至关重要。这种保护的一种特定形式被称为diplomatic asylum，指的是一个国家给予寻求庇护的外国国民的庇护。这一做法对国际关系和人权有着重要的影响。diplomatic asylum（外交庇护）不仅仅是提供庇护的问题；它涉及复杂的法律和政治考量，这些考量可能会影响国与国之间的双边关系。历史上，diplomatic asylum在许多情况下被用来保护那些在自己国家面临威胁的个人。例如，在冷战期间，许多异议人士在大使馆寻求庇护，希望逃脱压迫政权。这种庇护形式使东道国能够提供保护，同时也在国际外交的微妙平衡中进行导航。授予diplomatic asylum有时会导致国家之间的紧张关系，特别是当庇护寻求者被其本国政府视为罪犯或叛徒时。寻求diplomatic asylum的过程通常始于个人接近外交使团，如大使馆或领事馆，并请求保护。东道国必须评估请求的合法性，考虑诸如个人的安全、他们面临的威胁的性质以及对外交关系潜在影响等因素。这一评估并非简单，因为它通常需要对庇护寻求者的情况进行彻底调查。此外，关于diplomatic asylum的规则并没有普遍的共识，这导致不同国家之间的做法各不相同。一些国家已经建立了明确的法律框架来授予庇护，而其他国家则依赖于习惯做法或政治考量。这种缺乏标准化可能会造成混乱，并使庇护过程复杂化，因此庇护寻求者和东道国都必须了解各自的权利和责任。一个著名的diplomatic asylum案例发生在2012年，当时维基解密创始人朱利安·阿桑奇在伦敦的厄瓜多尔大使馆寻求庇护。他的案件突显了授予庇护的政治后果，因为它引起了媒体的广泛关注，并引发了关于言论自由、政府透明度和外交豁免限制的辩论。这一情况展示了diplomatic asylum如何成为国际关系的焦点，影响公众舆论和国家政策。diplomatic asylum的影响超越了个案；它还提出了关于国家保护人权责任的重要问题。提供庇护的国家通常将自己定位为人权的捍卫者，而拒绝授予庇护的国家可能因未能遵守国际规范而受到批评。这种动态可能对政府在回应庇护请求时施加压力，特别是当这些案件引起广泛关注时。总之，diplomatic asylum在国际法和人权的领域中发挥着至关重要的作用。它为逃避迫害的个人提供了一线希望，但同时也给外交关系带来了挑战。随着全球冲突的持续出现，理解和应对diplomatic asylum复杂性的必要性只会增加。各国必须在履行人权承诺与国际政治现实之间找到平衡，确保在维护稳定的国家关系的同时履行其义务。