detention charge

简明释义

滞费

英英释义

例句

1.The shipping company informed us that there would be a detention charge for keeping the container beyond the allowed time.

运输公司通知我们，超出允许时间保留集装箱将会产生滞留费用。

2.It's important to understand the terms of service to avoid any surprise detention charges.

了解服务条款以避免任何意外的滞留费用是很重要的。

3.Due to unexpected delays, we incurred a detention charge on our rental equipment.

由于意外的延误，我们在租赁设备上产生了滞留费用。

4.After reviewing the contract, we found a clause regarding detention charges for late returns.

在审核合同后，我们发现有关于逾期归还的滞留费用的条款。

5.The client was unhappy about the additional detention charge added to their invoice.

客户对发票上增加的滞留费用感到不满。

作文

In recent years, the issue of juvenile delinquency has become a significant concern for many communities. As a response to this growing problem, law enforcement agencies have implemented various measures to deter young individuals from engaging in criminal activities. One such measure is the imposition of a detention charge, which serves as a financial penalty for the temporary confinement of minors who have committed offenses. This essay will explore the implications of the detention charge, its impact on young offenders, and the broader societal consequences of this approach.The concept of a detention charge is relatively straightforward. When a minor is arrested and taken into custody, the authorities may impose a fee that must be paid by the guardian or parent of the juvenile. This fee is intended to cover the costs associated with the detention process, including facilities, staff, and administrative expenses. However, the introduction of such charges raises several ethical questions. For instance, should families who are already struggling financially be penalized further for their child's misbehavior? Critics argue that imposing a detention charge can exacerbate existing socio-economic disparities, as low-income families may find it challenging to pay these fees, leading to additional legal troubles or even further involvement in the juvenile justice system.Moreover, the psychological impact of a detention charge on young offenders cannot be overlooked. The experience of being detained is often traumatic, and adding a financial burden can create feelings of shame and guilt. Instead of focusing on rehabilitation and positive behavioral changes, young people may internalize the idea that they are defined by their mistakes and their families' financial situations. This stigma can hinder their ability to reintegrate into society and lead to recidivism.Additionally, the implementation of a detention charge may inadvertently encourage a punitive rather than rehabilitative approach to juvenile justice. Instead of addressing the root causes of delinquency, such as poverty, lack of education, or family issues, the focus shifts to financial penalties. This shift can divert attention from essential support services that could help prevent future offenses, such as counseling, mentorship programs, and educational opportunities. By prioritizing monetary penalties, the system risks failing to provide the necessary tools for young individuals to succeed and make better choices in the future.On the other hand, proponents of the detention charge argue that it serves as a deterrent for both the juvenile and their families. They believe that when families are financially responsible for their child's actions, it may encourage parents to take a more active role in their child's life and behavior. Additionally, some argue that these charges can generate revenue that can be reinvested into community programs aimed at preventing juvenile crime.In conclusion, while the detention charge may appear to be a practical solution for managing juvenile delinquency, it raises significant ethical and social concerns. The financial burden it places on families, the potential for increased recidivism, and the shift away from rehabilitative approaches are all critical factors that must be considered. As communities strive to address juvenile crime effectively, it is essential to strike a balance between accountability and support, ensuring that young individuals have the opportunity to learn from their mistakes and reintegrate into society successfully. Only then can we hope to reduce juvenile delinquency in a meaningful and compassionate manner.

近年来，青少年犯罪问题已成为许多社区的重要关注点。作为应对这一日益严重的问题的措施，执法机构实施了各种措施，以阻止年轻人参与犯罪活动。其中之一就是施加拘留费用，这是一种对已犯罪的未成年人临时拘留的经济处罚。本文将探讨拘留费用的影响、其对年轻犯罪者的影响以及这种方法对更广泛社会的后果。拘留费用的概念相对简单。当一名未成年人被逮捕并拘留时，执法部门可能会对其监护人或父母施加一笔费用。这笔费用旨在覆盖与拘留过程相关的成本，包括设施、人员和行政开支。然而，这种收费的引入引发了一些伦理问题。例如，经济困难的家庭是否应该因孩子的不当行为而受到进一步惩罚？批评者认为，施加拘留费用可能加剧现有的社会经济差距，因为低收入家庭可能很难支付这些费用，导致额外的法律麻烦甚至进一步卷入青少年司法系统。此外，拘留费用对年轻犯罪者的心理影响也不容忽视。被拘留的经历往往是创伤性的，而增加的经济负担可能会造成羞愧和内疚感。年轻人可能会将注意力从康复和积极行为改变转向自我定义，认为他们的身份由错误和家庭的经济状况所决定。这种污名化可能会妨碍他们重新融入社会的能力，并导致再次犯罪。此外，实施拘留费用可能无意中鼓励对青少年司法的惩罚性而非康复性方法。相较于解决犯罪的根本原因，如贫困、缺乏教育或家庭问题，重点转向了经济处罚。这种转变可能会分散对必要支持服务的关注，这些服务可以帮助预防未来的犯罪，例如咨询、导师计划和教育机会。通过优先考虑金钱处罚，系统可能会错失为年轻人提供成功和做出更好选择所需工具的机会。另一方面，拘留费用的支持者认为，这可以作为对青少年及其家庭的威慑。他们相信，当家庭对孩子的行为承担经济责任时，可能会鼓励父母在孩子的生活和行为中更加积极。此外，一些人认为，这些费用可以产生收入，再投资于旨在预防青少年犯罪的社区项目。总之，虽然拘留费用看似是管理青少年犯罪的实用解决方案，但它引发了重要的伦理和社会关注。它对家庭施加的经济负担、可能导致的再犯率增加以及对康复方法的转变都是必须考虑的关键因素。随着社区努力有效应对青少年犯罪，必须在问责制和支持之间找到平衡，确保年轻人有机会从错误中学习并成功融入社会。只有这样，我们才能希望以有意义和富有同情心的方式减少青少年犯罪。