militaristic
简明释义
英[ˌmɪlɪtəˈrɪstɪk]美[ˌmɪlɪtəˈrɪstɪk]
adj. 军国主义的
英英释义
Relating to or characterized by a strong emphasis on military power and readiness. | 与军事力量和准备的强烈强调相关或特征性。 |
Advocating the use of military force to achieve national objectives. | 主张使用军事力量来实现国家目标。 |
单词用法
军事文化 | |
军事政府 | |
军事政策 | |
军事主义意识形态 | |
军事主义立场 | |
军事主义社会 |
同义词
反义词
和平主义者 | The pacifist movement advocates for peaceful resolutions to conflicts. | 和平主义运动提倡通过和平方式解决冲突。 | |
外交的 | 外交努力在防止战争中至关重要。 | ||
非暴力的 | The nonviolent protests were effective in bringing about change. | 非暴力抗议在带来改变方面是有效的。 |
例句
1.It is the use of horses for transportation and warfare that explains why Inner Eurasian pastoralism proved the most mobile and the most militaristic of all major forms of pastoralism.
正是马在交通运输和战争中的使用,解释了为什么欧亚大陆内部的游牧主义是所有主要游牧形式中最具流动性和最具军国主义色彩的。
2.The actors playing apes actually seem more convincing than those playing humans. Tim Roth is good as the militaristic Thade, as is Helena Bonham-Carter as ari.
演员对人猿的表演显然比那些人类的表演更具说服力,蒂姆·罗斯很好地扮演了那位好战的塞德将军,海伦娜的艾丽也演得不错。
3.Their Militaristic power is about 30 years behind the major powers and they also have very low standards for human-kind.
他们的军事实力落后超级大国30年,他们的生活水平很低。
4.Set in a militaristic ultra-conservative America, The Long Walk pits 100 teenagers against each other in a grueling 450-mile marathon walk in which the penalty is death.
设置在一个军国主义极端保守的美国,该行对长期在艰苦的相互450英里的马拉松步行其中判死刑坑100个青少年。
5.The third thing, while perhaps less dire from a militaristic standpoint, did a horrendous number to an individual's morale, and could thus inadvertently result in situations one or two: "dear John.
第三件,“再见,约翰”绝情书(原文为Dear John,稍曲意译之)。虽然或许站在一个军人的角度来说没那么骇人,对于个人来说却是一件足以影响士气的大事,而且因此会在不经意间导致前两种悲剧发生。
6.In fact, a team's style of play often seems to relate to a nation's character. The Italians are creative. The Germans militaristic. The Greeks a little gassy.
事实上,一支球队的打法往往反映出他们民族的个性,意大利人喜欢创造,德国人比较具有军国主义,希腊人有点虚浮。
7.The third thing, while perhaps less dire from a militaristic standpoint, did a horrendous number to an individual's morale, and could thus inadvertently result in situations one or two: "dear John.
第三件,“再见,约翰”绝情书(原文为Dear John,稍曲意译之)。虽然或许站在一个军人的角度来说没那么骇人,对于个人来说却是一件足以影响士气的大事,而且因此会在不经意间导致前两种悲剧发生。
8.The government's militaristic 军事化的 policies have raised concerns among human rights activists.
政府的军事化的政策引起了人权活动家的担忧。
9.Some argue that militaristic 军事化的 values are being instilled in children through video games.
一些人认为,军事化的价值观正在通过视频游戏灌输给孩子们。
10.His militaristic 军事化的 mindset made it difficult for him to accept peaceful resolutions.
他军事化的思维使他难以接受和平解决方案。
11.The film portrays a militaristic 军事化的 society where war is glorified and peace is seen as weakness.
这部电影描绘了一个军事化的社会,在那里战争被美化,而和平被视为软弱。
12.Many people believe that a militaristic 军事化的 approach to foreign policy can lead to unnecessary conflicts.
许多人认为,军事化的外交政策可能导致不必要的冲突。
作文
In today's world, the concept of a militaristic society often raises significant discussions about the implications of such an ideology. A militaristic approach emphasizes the importance of military power and readiness, often at the expense of diplomatic solutions and peaceful resolutions. This essay will explore the characteristics of militaristic societies, their historical contexts, and the potential consequences they may have on global peace and stability.Historically, many nations have adopted militaristic policies during times of conflict or perceived threats. For instance, during World War II, countries like Germany and Japan exhibited extreme militaristic tendencies, prioritizing military expansion and aggression over diplomacy. This led to devastating consequences, not only for the nations involved but also for millions of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. The legacy of such militaristic ideologies serves as a reminder of the dangers inherent in prioritizing military strength above all else.In modern times, we can observe remnants of militaristic attitudes in various parts of the world. Some governments maintain large military budgets and engage in arms races, believing that a strong military presence is essential for national security. However, this often leads to a vicious cycle where neighboring countries feel threatened and respond by increasing their own military capabilities, thus escalating tensions and reducing the chances for peaceful dialogue.Moreover, the impact of militaristic policies extends beyond national borders. Nations that adopt a militaristic stance can influence regional dynamics, leading to alliances based on military power rather than mutual understanding and cooperation. This can create an environment where conflicts are more likely to arise, as countries are more inclined to resort to military solutions rather than engaging in meaningful negotiations.The consequences of a militaristic mindset are not solely limited to international relations; they can also affect domestic policies and societal values. In militaristic societies, there is often a glorification of military service and a normalization of violence as a means of problem-solving. This can lead to a culture that prioritizes aggression over empathy, ultimately undermining the social fabric of the nation.To counteract the effects of militaristic ideologies, it is crucial for societies to promote peace-building initiatives and invest in diplomatic efforts. Encouraging dialogue between nations, fostering cultural exchanges, and prioritizing humanitarian aid can help to mitigate the risks associated with militaristic policies. Education also plays a vital role in shaping public perception; teaching future generations about the importance of diplomacy and the value of peaceful coexistence can help to dismantle the allure of militaristic thinking.In conclusion, while the notion of a militaristic society may seem appealing to some as a means of ensuring security, the historical evidence suggests that such an approach often leads to conflict and suffering. By understanding the implications of militaristic ideologies and working towards a more peaceful and cooperative global community, we can strive to create a world where diplomacy and understanding take precedence over military might. Only then can we hope to break free from the cycle of violence and build a brighter future for generations to come.
在当今世界,militaristic 社会的概念常常引发关于这种意识形态影响的重要讨论。militaristic 方法强调军事力量和准备的重要性,往往以外交解决方案和和平解决为代价。本文将探讨 militaristic 社会的特征、其历史背景以及可能对全球和平与稳定产生的潜在后果。历史上,许多国家在冲突或感知威胁的时期采取了 militaristic 政策。例如,在第二次世界大战期间,德国和日本等国表现出极端的 militaristic 倾向,优先考虑军事扩张和侵略,而不是外交。这导致了灾难性的后果,不仅对参与的国家,而且对数百万无辜的平民造成了影响。这样的 militaristic 意识形态的遗产提醒我们,优先考虑军事力量而非其他方面的危险。在现代,我们可以观察到世界各地仍然存在 militaristic 态度的残余。一些政府维持庞大的军事预算并参与军备竞赛,认为强大的军事存在对国家安全至关重要。然而,这往往导致恶性循环,邻国感到威胁并通过增强自己的军事能力作出反应,从而加剧紧张局势,减少和平对话的机会。此外,militaristic 政策的影响不仅限于国界;采取 militaristic 立场的国家可以影响区域动态,基于军事力量而非相互理解与合作形成联盟。这可能创造一个更容易爆发冲突的环境,因为国家更倾向于诉诸军事解决方案,而不是进行有意义的谈判。militaristic 心态的后果不仅限于国际关系;它们还会影响国内政策和社会价值观。在 militaristic 社会中,军事服务常常被美化,暴力作为解决问题的手段被正常化。这可能导致一种优先考虑攻击而非同情的文化,最终削弱国家的社会结构。为了抵消 militaristic 意识形态的影响,促进和平建设倡议和投资于外交努力对于社会至关重要。鼓励国家间的对话、促进文化交流以及优先考虑人道主义援助可以帮助减轻与 militaristic 政策相关的风险。教育在塑造公众认知中也发挥着重要作用;教导未来一代关于外交重要性和和平共处价值的知识可以帮助拆解 militaristic 思维的吸引力。总之,尽管 militaristic 社会的概念对一些人来说似乎是确保安全的吸引力,但历史证据表明,这种方法往往导致冲突和痛苦。通过理解 militaristic 意识形态的影响,并努力朝着一个更加和平与合作的全球社区迈进,我们可以努力创造一个以外交和理解为优先,而非军事力量的世界。只有这样,我们才能希望打破暴力的循环,为未来几代人建立一个更加光明的未来。