sophistic

简明释义

英[səˈfɪstɪk]美[səˈfɪstɪk]

adj. 强词夺理的；诡辩的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.After finishing the classics, you can read sophistic books.

经传都读熟了之后就可以读子书了。

2.Finally, I compared sophistic theory with the philosophy after it, and then pointed out its advantages and disadvantages.

最后，在与其后自我意识哲学的比较中指出了智者哲学的意义与局限。

3.Through a study on the "sophistic propositions" of the pre-Qin School of Names, represented by "White dog is black", this paper proposes that these propositions are rationalistic in nature.

本文通过对“白狗黑”等先秦名家“诡辩”命题的研究，指出这些命题是先秦名家的理性主义哲学思想命题。

4.Through a study on the "sophistic propositions" of the pre-Qin School of Names, represented by "White dog is black", this paper proposes that these propositions are rationalistic in nature.

本文通过对“白狗黑”等先秦名家“诡辩”命题的研究，指出这些命题是先秦名家的理性主义哲学思想命题。

5.He often uses sophistic reasoning to win debates, even if his logic is flawed.

他经常使用sophistic（诡辩的）推理来赢得辩论，即使他的逻辑有缺陷。

6.Her sophistic style of writing often obscures the real issue at hand.

她的sophistic（诡辩的）写作风格常常掩盖了实际问题。

7.In philosophy, one must be careful not to fall into sophistic traps that lead to false conclusions.

在哲学中，人们必须小心不要陷入导致错误结论的sophistic（诡辩的）陷阱。

8.The professor warned his students against sophistic arguments that sound convincing but lack substance.

教授警告学生们要避免听起来令人信服但缺乏实质内容的sophistic（诡辩的）论点。

9.The lawyer's argument was so sophistic that it confused the jury rather than clarifying the facts.

这位律师的辩论如此sophistic（诡辩的），以至于让陪审团感到困惑，而不是澄清事实。

作文

In today's world, the ability to discern between genuine arguments and those that are merely sophistic is crucial. The term sophistic refers to reasoning that seems plausible on a superficial level but is actually misleading or fallacious. This concept has its roots in ancient Greece, where the Sophists were known for their clever but deceptive rhetoric. They often prioritized winning debates over seeking truth, which raises important questions about the nature of knowledge and persuasion in contemporary society.As we navigate through various discussions—whether in politics, academia, or everyday conversations—we encounter numerous instances of sophistic reasoning. Politicians, for instance, frequently employ sophistic tactics to sway public opinion. They may present statistics that appear compelling yet fail to account for crucial context, leading the audience to draw erroneous conclusions. This manipulation of information can create a false narrative, ultimately undermining informed decision-making among the populace.Moreover, social media platforms have amplified the prevalence of sophistic arguments. In the age of rapid information exchange, users often share content without critical analysis. Memes and sound bites can distort complex issues, reducing them to oversimplified claims that lack substantial evidence. As a result, many individuals find themselves engaging with sophistic rhetoric daily, which can shape their beliefs and opinions in ways that are not grounded in reality.Educational institutions bear the responsibility of equipping students with the skills necessary to identify and challenge sophistic reasoning. Critical thinking should be at the forefront of curricula, encouraging learners to analyze arguments rigorously. By fostering an environment where questioning and skepticism are valued, educators can help students become discerning consumers of information, capable of recognizing when they are being led astray by sophistic claims.In addition to education, the role of dialogue in combating sophistic reasoning cannot be overlooked. Engaging in open, honest discussions allows individuals to confront sophistic arguments directly. By asking probing questions and encouraging deeper exploration of ideas, participants can expose the flaws in sophistic reasoning. This process not only promotes understanding but also cultivates a culture of accountability, where individuals are encouraged to support their claims with robust evidence.Ultimately, the challenge posed by sophistic reasoning is not insurmountable. Through education, critical dialogue, and a commitment to intellectual honesty, society can develop a more discerning approach to argumentation. As we strive for clarity and truth, we must remain vigilant against the allure of sophistic reasoning, recognizing that while it may be tempting to accept easy answers, true understanding requires effort and scrutiny. In doing so, we can foster a more informed and thoughtful society, one that values substance over style and truth over deception.

在当今世界，辨别真实论点与表面上看似合理但实际上具有误导性或谬误的论证之间的能力至关重要。术语sophistic指的是在表面上似乎合理但实际上具有误导性或谬误的推理。这个概念源于古希腊，当时的智者以其巧妙但欺骗性的修辞而闻名。他们常常优先考虑赢得辩论而非追求真理，这引发了关于当代社会知识和说服性质的重要问题。随着我们在政治、学术或日常对话中进行各种讨论，我们会遇到许多sophistic推理的实例。例如，政治家经常使用sophistic策略来影响公众舆论。他们可能会呈现看似令人信服的统计数据，但未能考虑关键背景，从而导致观众得出错误结论。这种信息操纵可能会创造出虚假的叙事，最终削弱公众的明智决策。此外，社交媒体平台加剧了sophistic论证的普遍性。在快速信息交流的时代，用户往往在没有批判性分析的情况下分享内容。表情包和简短的片段可以扭曲复杂问题，将其简化为缺乏实质证据的过于简单的主张。因此，许多人发现自己每天都在接触sophistic修辞，这可能以不扎根于现实的方式塑造他们的信仰和观点。教育机构有责任为学生提供识别和挑战sophistic推理所需的技能。批判性思维应该成为课程的重点，鼓励学习者严格分析论点。通过营造一个重视质疑和怀疑的环境，教育者可以帮助学生成为信息的挑剔消费者，能够识别何时被sophistic主张所误导。除了教育，面对面对话在对抗sophistic推理中的作用也不可忽视。进行开放、诚实的讨论使个人能够直接面对sophistic论证。通过提出深思熟虑的问题并鼓励对思想的深入探讨，参与者可以揭示sophistic推理中的缺陷。这个过程不仅促进理解，还培养了问责制的文化，鼓励个人用强有力的证据支持自己的主张。最终，sophistic推理所带来的挑战并非不可逾越。通过教育、批判性对话和对知识诚实的承诺，社会可以发展出一种更具辨识力的论证方式。当我们追求清晰和真理时，必须对sophistic推理的诱惑保持警惕，认识到虽然接受简单的答案可能很诱人，但真正的理解需要付出努力和审查。通过这样做，我们可以培养一个更加明智和深思熟虑的社会，一个重视实质而非形式、重视真相而非欺骗的社会。