monarchism

简明释义

英['mɒnəkɪzəm]美[ˈmɑːnərˌkɪzəm]

n. 君主主义；君主政体

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Many people believe that monarchism 君主主义 can provide stability in times of political chaos.

许多人认为，monarchism 君主主义能够在政治混乱时期提供稳定。

2.The rise of monarchism 君主主义 in some regions has sparked discussions about the role of royal families.

某些地区monarchism 君主主义的兴起引发了关于王室家族角色的讨论。

3.Critics argue that monarchism 君主主义 is outdated and incompatible with modern democracy.

批评者认为，monarchism 君主主义过时且与现代民主不相容。

4.In history classes, we studied the impact of monarchism 君主主义 on European politics.

在历史课上，我们研究了monarchism 君主主义对欧洲政治的影响。

5.The debate over monarchism 君主主义 in the country has intensified in recent years.

近年来，关于monarchism 君主主义的辩论在该国愈演愈烈。

作文

Monarchism has been a significant political ideology throughout history, advocating for the rule of a single sovereign authority, typically a king or queen. This system of governance is characterized by the belief that a monarch is divinely appointed and possesses inherent rights to govern. The concept of monarchism (君主主义) can be traced back to ancient civilizations where kings were seen as representatives of the divine on Earth. In many cultures, monarchs were not only political leaders but also spiritual figures who played crucial roles in maintaining societal order and cultural identity.One of the most notable examples of monarchism (君主主义) in history is the absolute monarchy, where the monarch holds supreme authority over the state and is not bound by laws or a constitution. Countries like France under Louis XIV exemplified this form of governance, often referred to as the 'Sun King.' His reign illustrated how monarchism (君主主义) could centralize power and create a strong national identity, albeit at the cost of individual freedoms and the rise of dissent.In contrast, constitutional monarchies emerged as a response to the excesses of absolute rule. In these systems, monarchs share power with elected officials and are bound by a constitution. The United Kingdom serves as a prime example of a constitutional monarchy where the monarch's role is largely ceremonial, and real political power rests with Parliament. Here, monarchism (君主主义) coexists with democratic principles, allowing for a balance between tradition and modern governance.The debate surrounding monarchism (君主主义) remains relevant today. Proponents argue that monarchies provide stability and continuity, serving as symbols of national unity and heritage. They contend that a hereditary leader can embody the values and traditions of a nation, fostering a sense of belonging among citizens. Furthermore, supporters of monarchism (君主主义) often highlight the charitable and diplomatic roles that modern monarchs play, arguing that their presence can enhance a country's international standing.On the other hand, critics of monarchism (君主主义) assert that hereditary rule is outdated and incompatible with modern democratic ideals. They argue that placing power in the hands of a single individual, regardless of lineage, can lead to abuses and a lack of accountability. Many advocate for republicanism, which emphasizes elected leadership and the idea that sovereignty belongs to the people rather than a monarch. This perspective gained traction during the Enlightenment, when philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau challenged the legitimacy of monarchism (君主主义) in favor of popular sovereignty.In recent years, some countries have seen a resurgence of interest in monarchism (君主主义), particularly in nations that have experienced political instability or conflict. For instance, in places where democratic institutions are weak, the idea of a unifying figurehead can be appealing. However, the effectiveness of monarchism (君主主义) in addressing contemporary political challenges remains a contentious issue.Ultimately, monarchism (君主主义) represents a complex interplay between tradition and modernity, authority and democracy. As societies evolve, the relevance and application of monarchism (君主主义) will continue to be debated. Whether one views it as a relic of the past or a viable form of governance, understanding its historical roots and implications is essential for engaging in discussions about political systems and their impact on society.