retrial

简明释义

英[ˈriːtraɪəl;ˌriːˈtraɪəl]美[ˈriːtraɪəlˌˌriːˈtraɪəl]

n. 复审；复试

复 数 r e t r i a l s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The parties concerned may appeal against the judgment or written order rendered in a retrial of their case.

当事人对重审案件的判决、裁定，可以上诉。

2.The second chapter is Comparative review of Civil Retrial Procedure.

第二章民事再审程序的比较法考察。

3.It should be strictly limited the scope of retrial.

对它的提起范围应予以严格限制。

4.It is the common voice of academic field and practice field to reconstruct the specific rules of China retrial system.

重构中国再审制度的具体规则，已是学界和实务界的共同呼声。

5.After a lengthy retrial, a new jury convicted them after 54 hours of deliberations.

经过漫长的重审，新陪审团经过54小时的商议后，宣告他们有罪。

6.Civil suit retrial program is a special relief program in civil disputes.

民事再审程序是民事纠纷的特殊的救济程序。

7.It is the common voice of academic field and practice field to reconstruct the specific rules of China retrial system.

重构中国再审制度的具体规则，已是学界和实务界的共同呼声。

8.Retrial system is the rationality of its existence, and reasonable and should be such strict limitations.

再审制度是有其存在的合理性的，而此种合理性又应当是有严格条件限制的。

9.After the jury was found to be biased, the case was sent back for a retrial.

由于陪审团被发现有偏见，该案件被送回进行重审。

10.The outcome of the retrial could set a precedent for future cases.

此次重审的结果可能为未来的案件设立先例。

11.In high-profile cases, a retrial can attract significant media attention.

在高调案件中，重审可能会吸引大量媒体关注。

12.The defendant's lawyer argued that a retrial was necessary due to procedural errors in the original trial.

被告的律师辩称，由于原审程序错误，有必要进行重审。

13.The judge ordered a retrial to ensure that all evidence was considered fairly.

法官下令进行一次重审以确保所有证据都得到公正考虑。

作文

In the realm of law, the term retrial refers to the process of trying a case again after it has already been adjudicated. This legal procedure may arise from various circumstances, such as the discovery of new evidence, procedural errors during the initial trial, or even a verdict that is deemed unjust by a higher court. The concept of retrial is essential in ensuring that justice is served and that individuals are not wrongfully convicted or acquitted due to flaws in the judicial process.The importance of a retrial can be illustrated through several high-profile cases that have garnered public attention. For instance, in some instances where significant evidence was overlooked or mishandled, a retrial provided an opportunity for the truth to emerge. This underscores the notion that the legal system strives for accuracy and fairness, acknowledging that mistakes can occur.One notable case that involved a retrial is that of the infamous murder trial of a well-known figure. Initially, the jury delivered a guilty verdict based on circumstantial evidence. However, years later, new DNA evidence surfaced that pointed to another suspect entirely. The defense team sought a retrial, arguing that the new evidence could potentially exonerate their client. The court agreed, and the retrial allowed the jury to reevaluate the evidence with fresh eyes. Ultimately, the verdict was overturned, highlighting how crucial retrial can be in rectifying past injustices.Critics of the retrial process often express concerns about the potential for abuse. They argue that allowing cases to be retried could lead to endless litigation, causing emotional and financial strain on all parties involved. However, proponents assert that the benefits of ensuring justice far outweigh these concerns. They argue that the legal system must remain flexible enough to correct its own mistakes, as the stakes in criminal cases are incredibly high.In addition to criminal cases, retrial can also occur in civil litigation. For example, if a jury awards damages to a plaintiff but the defendant successfully appeals based on a procedural error, the case may go back to court for a retrial. This ensures that both parties receive a fair hearing and that the outcome is just.In conclusion, the concept of retrial is a vital component of the legal system, serving as a mechanism for correcting errors and ensuring that justice prevails. While it may introduce complexities into the judicial process, the ability to revisit a case allows for the possibility of uncovering the truth. As society continues to evolve and new evidence emerges, the legal system must adapt, and retrial remains a necessary tool in that pursuit. It is a reminder that the quest for justice is ongoing and that the law must continually strive to reflect fairness and accuracy in its judgments.

在法律领域，术语retrial指的是在案件已经裁决后再次审理该案件的过程。这种法律程序可能由于各种情况而产生，例如发现新证据、初审过程中存在程序错误，甚至是高等法院认为不公正的裁决。retrial的概念对于确保正义得到伸张至关重要，确保个人不会因司法过程中的缺陷而被错误定罪或无罪释放。retrial的重要性可以通过一些引起公众关注的高调案件来说明。例如，在某些情况下，显著证据被忽视或处理不当，retrial提供了一个机会，让真相浮出水面。这强调了法律系统努力追求准确性和公平性的理念，承认错误可能会发生。一个涉及retrial的著名案件是一个知名人物的谋杀审判。最初，陪审团基于间接证据做出了有罪裁决。然而，几年后，出现了新的DNA证据，指向了另一个嫌疑人。辩护团队寻求进行retrial，理由是新证据可能会使他们的客户无罪。法院同意了，该retrial允许陪审团以新的视角重新评估证据。最终，裁决被推翻，突显了retrial在纠正过去的不公正方面的重要性。retrial过程的批评者常常对滥用的潜在风险表示担忧。他们认为，允许案件重新审理可能导致无休止的诉讼，给所有相关方带来情感和经济上的压力。然而，支持者则主张，确保正义的好处远远超过这些担忧。他们认为，法律系统必须保持灵活，以便纠正自身的错误，因为刑事案件的利害关系极其重大。除了刑事案件，retrial也可以发生在民事诉讼中。例如，如果陪审团向原告裁定赔偿，但被告基于程序错误成功上诉，则案件可能会返回法庭进行retrial。这确保了双方都能获得公正的听证，结果也是公正的。总之，retrial的概念是法律系统的重要组成部分，作为纠正错误和确保正义得以实现的机制。虽然它可能给司法过程引入复杂性，但重新审理案件的能力使揭示真相成为可能。随着社会的不断发展和新证据的出现，法律系统必须适应，而retrial仍然是这一追求中的必要工具。这提醒我们，追求正义是一个持续的过程，法律必须不断努力在裁决中反映公平和准确性。