refuting

简明释义

英[rɪˈfjuːtɪŋ]美[rɪˈfjutɪŋ]

v. 反驳，驳斥；驳倒；否认（refute 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.What is the actual that you are refuting?

您要反驳的是哪点？

2.The purpose of the sealing and refuting is to stop mistakes and faults before it happens. Its chief way is to seal the imperial decree and refute correctly.

封驳的目的在于追救缺失，防患于未然，而封还诏敕并加以驳正则是其最主要的方式。

3.He dismissed my argument contemptuously as not worth refuting.

他把我的论证轻蔑地一笔抹杀，认为不值一驳。

4.The Philippines' accusation is madewith ulterior motives and is not worth refuting.

菲律宾方面的指责别有用心，不值一驳。

5.In continuation, I will list these preconceived obstacles, try to explain their origins and give good arguments in refuting them.

紧接着，我还会列举某些先入为主的误解，试图阐释其起源，并给出有力的证据驳斥这些论点。

6.To provide a basis for refuting heresy.

提供驳斥异端的根据。

7.Davidson's omniscient interpreter argument (OIA) is a transcendental argument as a kind of method refuting skepticism.

戴维森的先验论证同样也可以是一种驳斥怀疑论的方法，例如其著名的全知解释者论证。

8.Discussing atheism's history and its refuting God's existence is very significant to strengthen atheism's education.

探讨无神论思想史及其对上帝存在的驳斥，对加强无神论教育具有很强的现实意义。

9.He wrote an article refuting the claims made in the documentary.

他写了一篇文章来驳斥纪录片中的说法。

10.In her speech, she focused on refuting common misconceptions about climate change.

在她的演讲中，她专注于驳斥关于气候变化的常见误解。

11.The scientist is refuting the previous theory with new evidence.

这位科学家正在用新证据驳斥之前的理论。

12.The lawyer spent hours refuting the allegations against his client.

律师花了几个小时来驳斥对他客户的指控。

13.The researcher presented data refuting the effectiveness of the drug.

研究人员提供了数据来驳斥该药物的有效性。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, the importance of critical thinking cannot be overstated. One of the most essential skills in this regard is the ability to analyze arguments and identify logical fallacies. This is where the act of refuting (反驳) comes into play. To refute (反驳) an argument means to provide evidence or reasoning that contradicts the claims made by another party. It is not merely about disagreeing; it involves a systematic approach to dismantling the opposing viewpoint with facts and logic.For instance, consider a debate on climate change. One side may argue that human activities are not significantly impacting the environment. A well-prepared opponent would need to refute (反驳) this claim by presenting scientific studies that demonstrate the correlation between industrial emissions and global warming. By doing so, they are not just stating their opinion but are actively engaging in the discourse by providing substantial evidence.The process of refuting (反驳) an argument also requires understanding the nuances of the opposing side's position. This means that one must listen carefully and comprehend the basis of the argument before attempting to dismantle it. Misrepresenting the argument, often referred to as a straw man fallacy, weakens one's own position and undermines credibility. Therefore, effective refutation (反驳) demands both knowledge and respect for differing viewpoints.Moreover, refuting (反驳) an argument can take various forms. It might involve statistical data, expert testimonies, or logical reasoning. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice often depends on the context of the discussion. For example, in a scientific debate, empirical data may carry more weight than anecdotal evidence. In contrast, personal experiences might resonate more in a social or ethical discussion.Another important aspect of refuting (反驳) is the tone and manner in which it is presented. A respectful and calm demeanor can significantly enhance the persuasiveness of the argument. Aggressive or dismissive attitudes can alienate the audience and undermine the effectiveness of the refutation (反驳). Thus, mastering the art of refuting (反驳) involves not only intellectual rigor but also emotional intelligence.In conclusion, the skill of refuting (反驳) is vital in any academic or intellectual setting. It allows individuals to engage in meaningful discussions, challenge unfounded claims, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge. As society faces complex issues that require thoughtful deliberation, the ability to refute (反驳) effectively will remain an invaluable asset. By honing this skill, we not only become better thinkers but also more informed citizens capable of participating in the democratic process and advocating for truth and justice.

在学术讨论的领域，批判性思维的重要性不容小觑。在这方面，分析论点和识别逻辑谬误的能力是最基本的技能之一。这就是refuting（反驳）这一行为的重要性所在。Refuting（反驳）一个论点意味着提供与另一方所声称的内容相矛盾的证据或推理。这不仅仅是不同意；它涉及到用事实和逻辑系统地拆解对立观点。例如，考虑一下关于气候变化的辩论。一方可能会争辩说人类活动并没有显著影响环境。而准备充分的对手需要通过提出科学研究来refute（反驳）这一主张，这些研究表明工业排放与全球变暖之间的相关性。通过这样做，他们不仅仅是在表达自己的意见，而是在通过提供实质证据积极参与讨论。Refuting（反驳）一个论点的过程还需要理解对方立场的细微差别。这意味着必须仔细倾听，并在试图拆解之前理解论点的基础。错误地表述论点，通常被称为稻草人谬误，会削弱自己的立场并损害信誉。因此，有效的refutation（反驳）要求对知识的掌握以及对不同观点的尊重。此外，refuting（反驳）论点可以采取多种形式。它可能涉及统计数据、专家证言或逻辑推理。每种方法都有其优缺点，选择通常取决于讨论的背景。例如，在科学辩论中，实证数据可能比轶事证据更有分量。相反，个人经历在社会或伦理讨论中可能更具共鸣。Refuting（反驳）的另一个重要方面是呈现方式和语气。尊重和冷静的举止可以显著增强论点的说服力。激进或轻蔑的态度可能使观众感到疏远，削弱refutation（反驳）的有效性。因此，掌握refuting（反驳）艺术不仅需要智力上的严谨，还需要情商。总之，refuting（反驳）技能在任何学术或智力环境中都是至关重要的。它使个人能够参与有意义的讨论，挑战毫无根据的主张，并为知识的进步做出贡献。随着社会面临需要深思熟虑的复杂问题，有效refute（反驳）的能力将始终是一项宝贵的资产。通过磨练这一技能，我们不仅能成为更好的思考者，也能成为能够参与民主进程并倡导真相与正义的更有见识的公民。