wiretapping

简明释义

英[ˈwaɪətæpɪŋ]美[ˈwaɪərtæpɪŋ]

n. 窃听；窃听器

adj. 搭线窃听的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The so-called network recording box refers to a network through a remote computer to the provision of recording the location of the box and recording wiretapping functional network equipment.

所谓网络录音盒是指一种可以通过网络向远程的计算机提供录音盒所在位置的监听以及录音功能的网络设备。

2.Chaney, who was expected to appear in a Florida courtroom later Wednesday, was charged with 26 counts of identity theft, unauthorized access to a protected computer and wiretapping.

预计下周三出现在审判庭上的钱尼，面临着26项身份盗窃及未授权登录和监听一个受保护的计算机的指控。

3.The so-called network recording box refers to a network through a remote computer to the provision of recording the location of the box and recording wiretapping functional network equipment.

所谓网络录音盒是指一种可以通过网络向远程的计算机提供录音盒所在位置的监听以及录音功能的网络设备。

4.Many people are concerned about wiretapping and its implications for privacy.

许多人担心窃听及其对隐私的影响。

5.The journalist revealed that wiretapping was common among corporations trying to gain a competitive edge.

这位记者透露，在试图获得竞争优势的公司中，窃听是很常见的。

6.The police obtained a warrant for wiretapping to gather evidence on the suspected criminal.

警方获得了对嫌疑犯进行窃听的搜查令，以收集证据。

7.During the investigation, agents discovered that wiretapping had been used without proper authorization.

在调查过程中，特工发现未经适当授权进行了窃听。

8.The government has strict regulations regarding wiretapping to protect citizens' rights.

政府对窃听有严格的规定，以保护公民的权利。

作文

In today's digital age, the concept of privacy has become increasingly complex, especially with the rise of technology. One of the most controversial practices associated with this complexity is wiretapping, which refers to the act of intercepting telephone or internet communications without the consent of the parties involved. This practice raises significant ethical and legal questions about the balance between national security and individual privacy rights.The origins of wiretapping can be traced back to the early 20th century when law enforcement agencies began using it as a tool to combat organized crime. Initially, it was seen as a necessary measure to protect citizens from criminal activities. However, as technology advanced, so did the methods of wiretapping. Today, it is not limited to just phone calls; it encompasses a wide range of digital communications, including emails, text messages, and social media interactions.Proponents of wiretapping argue that it is essential for maintaining public safety and preventing terrorism. They believe that in certain circumstances, such as during investigations of serious crimes or threats to national security, wiretapping can provide crucial evidence that may save lives. For example, intelligence agencies often rely on wiretapping to monitor suspects who may pose a threat to society. In this context, it is viewed as a necessary evil, a tool that must be employed to ensure the greater good.On the other hand, critics of wiretapping highlight the potential for abuse and the infringement of civil liberties. They argue that unchecked surveillance can lead to a slippery slope where the government overreaches its authority, violating citizens' rights to privacy. High-profile cases, such as the Edward Snowden revelations in 2013, have brought to light the extent of government surveillance programs and raised public awareness about the implications of wiretapping. Many people began to question whether the government was prioritizing security at the expense of personal freedoms.Additionally, the legality of wiretapping varies significantly across different countries. In some nations, strict regulations are in place to protect citizens from unauthorized surveillance, while in others, wiretapping is conducted with little oversight. This discrepancy leads to confusion and concern among citizens regarding their rights and the extent to which they are being monitored.As technology continues to evolve, so does the debate surrounding wiretapping. With the advent of encrypted communication platforms, the effectiveness of traditional wiretapping methods is being challenged. While encryption offers users a heightened sense of security, it also poses challenges for law enforcement agencies seeking to investigate criminal activities. This has led to discussions about finding a balance between privacy and security, with some advocating for 'backdoors' in encryption technologies that would allow authorities access under specific circumstances.In conclusion, wiretapping is a multifaceted issue that encapsulates the ongoing struggle between the need for security and the preservation of individual privacy. As society grapples with these challenges, it is crucial to engage in open dialogue about the ethical implications of wiretapping and to establish clear guidelines that protect citizens' rights while ensuring public safety. Only through careful consideration and regulation can we navigate the complexities of modern surveillance in a manner that respects both security and privacy.

在当今数字时代，隐私的概念变得越来越复杂，尤其是随着技术的崛起。与这种复杂性相关的一个最具争议的做法是窃听，指的是在未征得相关方同意的情况下拦截电话或互联网通信。这种做法引发了关于国家安全与个人隐私权之间平衡的重大伦理和法律问题。

窃听的起源可以追溯到20世纪初，当时执法机构开始将其作为打击有组织犯罪的一种工具。最初，它被视为保护公民免受犯罪活动的必要措施。然而，随着技术的发展，窃听的方法也随之演变。如今，它不仅限于电话通话；还包括电子邮件、短信和社交媒体互动等各种数字通信。

支持窃听的人认为，这对于维护公共安全和防止恐怖主义至关重要。他们认为，在某些情况下，例如在严重犯罪或国家安全威胁的调查中，窃听可以提供至关重要的证据，可能挽救生命。例如，情报机构常常依赖窃听来监控可能对社会构成威胁的嫌疑人。在这种背景下，这被视为一种必要的恶，是确保更大善良必须使用的工具。

另一方面，窃听的批评者强调了滥用的潜力及对公民自由的侵犯。他们认为，缺乏监督的监视可能导致政府超越其权限，侵犯公民的隐私权。诸如爱德华·斯诺登在2013年的揭露等高调案件揭示了政府监视计划的范围，并提高了公众对窃听影响的认识。许多人开始质疑政府是否在优先考虑安全的同时牺牲了个人自由。

此外，窃听的合法性在不同国家之间差异显著。在某些国家，制定了严格的法规，以保护公民免受未经授权的监视，而在其他国家，窃听则几乎没有监督。这种差异导致公民对其权利及其被监视的程度感到困惑和担忧。

随着技术的不断发展，围绕窃听的辩论也在继续。随着加密通信平台的出现，传统窃听方法的有效性受到挑战。虽然加密为用户提供了更高的安全感，但它也给寻求调查犯罪活动的执法机构带来了挑战。这导致了关于在隐私和安全之间找到平衡的讨论，有人提倡在特定情况下允许当局访问的加密技术“后门”。

总之，窃听是一个多方面的问题，体现了对安全需求与个人隐私保护之间持续斗争的挑战。当社会面对这些挑战时，开展关于窃听伦理影响的公开对话并建立明确的指导方针以保护公民权利，同时确保公共安全至关重要。只有通过谨慎的考虑和监管，我们才能以尊重安全和隐私的方式驾驭现代监视的复杂性。