unipolar

简明释义

英[juːnɪˈpəʊlə]美[ˌjʊnɪˈpolər]

adj. 单极的；单尾的（神经细胞等）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Rachman, chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, says America's "unipolar moment" on the world's stage has passed.

金融时报首席外事评论员拉赫曼说，美国在世界舞台上的“单级时刻”已经结束了。

2.The first unipolar plate and the second unipolar plate are aligned to dispose the first active area adjacent the second active area.

第一单极板和第二单极板对准以邻近第二活性区布置第一活性区。

3.The United States was enjoying its “unipolar moment”;

美国一直在享受它的“单国时刻”；

4.The tube assembly consists of an Unipolar X-Ray tube with cooled anode at ground potential and a high voltage receptacle socket.

管路安装由单级X射线管，地电位的冷却性阳极和高电压插座组成。

5.Most sufferers having other close relatives with either unipolar or bipolar depression.

大多数患者有单极性或双极性抑郁症与其他近亲属。

6.In short, Japan is getting real-life experience of what maritime Asia would be like without unipolar America power.

简言之，日本正切身体验到，没有单极美国强权的情况下，亚洲沿海地区将会怎样。

7.The term unipolar refers to a system dominated by a single power or influence.

术语unipolar指的是一个由单一力量或影响主导的系统。

8.Some analysts argue that the shift from a unipolar to a multipolar world is inevitable.

一些分析人士认为，从unipolar向多极化世界的转变是不可避免的。

9.A unipolar magnetic field can be observed in certain types of magnets.

在某些类型的磁铁中可以观察到unipolar磁场。

10.In a unipolar world, the United States holds the majority of global influence.

在一个unipolar的世界中，美国拥有全球大部分影响力。

11.The unipolar model of international relations suggests that one state is preeminent.

国际关系的unipolar模型表明一个国家是最重要的。

作文

In recent years, the term unipolar has gained significant attention in both political and economic discussions. A unipolar world refers to a global structure where one superpower dominates international relations, military capabilities, and economic influence. This concept stands in contrast to a multipolar world, where multiple nations hold significant power and influence. Understanding the dynamics of a unipolar system is crucial for comprehending current geopolitical events and future trends.Historically, the post-Cold War era is often cited as a prime example of a unipolar world. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States emerged as the sole superpower, exerting its influence across various regions and shaping international policies. The unipolar structure allowed the U.S. to lead initiatives such as NATO expansion, global trade agreements, and interventions in conflicts around the world. This dominance, however, has not been without its challenges and criticisms.Critics argue that a unipolar world can lead to unilateral decision-making, where the dominant power may act without considering the interests or perspectives of other nations. This can result in tensions and conflicts, as seen in various military interventions led by the U.S. in regions like the Middle East. Furthermore, the rise of emerging powers, particularly China and Russia, has sparked debates about the sustainability of a unipolar world order. As these nations expand their influence, some analysts suggest that we are transitioning towards a more multipolar world, where power is distributed among several key players. This shift raises important questions about the future of global governance and cooperation. In a unipolar system, the dominant nation often sets the rules of the game; however, in a multipolar context, negotiations and compromises become essential as multiple voices vie for attention and influence.Economically, the implications of a unipolar world are also profound. The U.S. dollar has long been the world's primary reserve currency, a status that reinforces American economic power. In a unipolar framework, countries may rely heavily on the U.S. for trade and investment, creating dependencies that can be exploited. However, as alternative currencies gain traction and countries seek to diversify their economic partnerships, the unipolar economic dominance of the U.S. may face challenges.Moreover, the environmental and social dimensions of a unipolar world cannot be overlooked. Global issues such as climate change, pandemics, and humanitarian crises require collaborative efforts that may be hindered by a unipolar approach. When a single country leads, it may prioritize its national interests over global needs, potentially exacerbating inequalities and hindering progress.In conclusion, the concept of unipolar is pivotal in understanding contemporary global affairs. While the United States remains a dominant force, the emergence of new powers and the complexities of global challenges suggest that the future may not be strictly unipolar. As we navigate this evolving landscape, it is essential to recognize the importance of multilateralism and cooperation in addressing the pressing issues of our time. The balance between unipolar dominance and multipolar collaboration will shape the future of international relations and the world as a whole.

近年来，术语单极在政治和经济讨论中引起了显著关注。单极世界指的是一个全球结构，其中一个超级大国主导国际关系、军事能力和经济影响力。这个概念与多极世界形成对比，在多极世界中，多个国家拥有重要的权力和影响力。理解单极系统的动态对于理解当前的地缘政治事件和未来趋势至关重要。历史上，后冷战时代通常被视为单极世界的典型例子。随着1991年苏联的解体，美国成为唯一的超级大国，在各个地区施加影响并塑造国际政策。单极结构使美国能够主导北约扩展、全球贸易协议以及在世界各地的冲突干预。然而，这种主导地位并非没有挑战和批评。批评者认为，单极世界可能导致单边决策，主导力量可能在不考虑其他国家利益或观点的情况下采取行动。这可能导致紧张局势和冲突，正如美国在中东地区进行的各种军事干预所示。此外，特别是中国和俄罗斯等新兴力量的崛起，引发了关于单极世界秩序可持续性的辩论。随着这些国家扩大其影响力，一些分析人士建议我们正在向更加多极的世界过渡，在这个世界中，权力分布在几个关键参与者之间。这一转变引发了关于全球治理和合作未来的重要问题。在单极系统中，主导国家往往设定游戏规则；然而，在多极背景下，谈判和妥协变得至关重要，因为多个声音争相获得关注和影响。经济上，单极世界的影响也深远。美元长期以来一直是全球主要储备货币，这一地位加强了美国的经济实力。在单极框架中，各国可能在贸易和投资方面严重依赖美国，造成可以被利用的依赖关系。然而，随着替代货币获得牵引力，各国寻求多样化经济伙伴关系，美国的单极经济主导地位可能面临挑战。此外，单极世界的环境和社会维度同样不容忽视。气候变化、疫情和人道主义危机等全球性问题需要合作努力，而这可能会受到单极方法的阻碍。当一个国家主导时，它可能优先考虑国家利益而非全球需求，从而可能加剧不平等并阻碍进步。总之，单极的概念在理解当代全球事务中至关重要。尽管美国仍然是一个主导力量，但新兴力量的出现以及全球挑战的复杂性表明，未来可能并不严格是单极的。在我们驾驭这一不断演变的格局时，认识到多边主义和合作在应对我们时代紧迫问题中的重要性至关重要。单极主导地位与多极合作之间的平衡将塑造国际关系和整个世界的未来。