standardized

简明释义

英[/ˈstændərdaɪzd/]美[/ˈstændərdaɪzd/]

adj. 标准的；标准化的；定型的

v. 使合乎标准；按标准校准；制定标准（standardize 的过去式和过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Since steamed bun are standardized, what is local agency waiting for?

馒头都标准化了，本土广告公司还等什么？

2.Those are the only standardized bindings defined for WSDL.

这些只是为WSDL定义的标准化绑定。

3.There are no compulsory standardized tests in Finland, apart from one exam at the end of students' senior year in high school.

除了在学生高中最后一年的那一次考试，芬兰没有其它强制性的标准化考试。

4.How will default or missing data be standardized?

默认的或缺失的数据如何标准化？

5.Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity”.

哈格尔说，在美国我们往往把工作设计成“照本宣科”和“高度标准化”的模式，没有给人们留下一丁点发挥“个人主动性和创新”的空间。

6.That isn't why the government—under pressure from cancer charities, health workers and the Labour party—has agreed to legislate for standardized packaging.

这并不是政府在癌症慈善机构、医疗工作者和工党的压力下同意为标准化包装立法的原因。

7.Their regular and standardized shapes would have made them simple to stack and store.

它们形状规则且标准，极易堆放储藏。

8.The standardized testing methods helped to achieve more reliable results.

这些标准化的测试方法有助于获得更可靠的结果。

9.We need standardized procedures for quality control in our production line.

我们需要在生产线上实施标准化的质量控制程序。

10.The company has implemented standardized training modules for all new employees.

该公司为所有新员工实施了标准化的培训模块。

11.To improve communication, we adopted a standardized format for all reports.

为了改善沟通，我们为所有报告采用了标准化格式。

12.The tests were standardized to ensure fairness among all students.

这些测试被标准化以确保所有学生的公平性。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the concept of education has undergone significant transformations. One of the most notable trends is the move towards a more standardized approach to learning and assessment. This shift has sparked debates among educators, policymakers, and parents alike, raising questions about the effectiveness and implications of standardized testing and curricula.The term standardized refers to the process of establishing uniform procedures and criteria to ensure consistency across various educational settings. In essence, standardized tests are designed to measure students' knowledge and skills in a consistent manner, allowing for comparisons between different individuals and groups. Proponents argue that this approach provides a clear benchmark for evaluating student performance and accountability in schools.However, critics of standardized testing argue that it can lead to a narrow focus on rote memorization rather than fostering critical thinking and creativity. For instance, many teachers feel pressured to teach to the test, prioritizing test preparation over deeper learning experiences. This phenomenon can stifle innovation in teaching methods and reduce the richness of the curriculum, as educators may feel compelled to cover specific content areas that are tested rather than exploring subjects in greater depth.Moreover, standardized assessments often fail to account for the diverse backgrounds and learning styles of students. Children come from various socio-economic, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds, which can significantly impact their performance on standardized tests. Critics argue that relying heavily on these assessments can perpetuate inequalities in the education system, as students from disadvantaged backgrounds may not have access to the same resources and support as their peers.Additionally, there is a growing concern that the emphasis on standardized testing can lead to a detrimental teaching environment. When educators are held accountable primarily for their students' test scores, they may feel compelled to cut corners or engage in unethical practices, such as teaching test-taking strategies instead of meaningful content. This situation can create a culture of fear and stress among both teachers and students, undermining the overall educational experience.Despite these criticisms, it is essential to recognize that standardized assessments can serve a valuable purpose when used appropriately. They can provide useful data for identifying areas where students may need additional support and help schools track progress over time. When combined with other forms of assessment, such as project-based learning and formative assessments, standardized tests can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of student learning.In conclusion, the debate surrounding standardized education is complex and multifaceted. While standardized tests can offer insights into student performance and help maintain accountability, they also have the potential to narrow the focus of education and exacerbate existing inequalities. As we move forward, it is crucial for educators and policymakers to strike a balance between maintaining high standards and fostering an inclusive, engaging, and holistic learning environment for all students. By doing so, we can ensure that education remains a tool for empowerment rather than a source of division.

在当今快速发展的世界中，教育的概念经历了重大的变革。最显著的趋势之一是向更为标准化的学习和评估方法的转变。这一变化在教育工作者、政策制定者和家长之间引发了辩论，提出了关于标准化测试和课程的有效性及其影响的问题。术语标准化指的是建立统一程序和标准的过程，以确保在各种教育环境中的一致性。本质上，标准化测试旨在以一致的方式衡量学生的知识和技能，从而允许对不同个体和群体之间进行比较。支持者认为，这种方法提供了一个明确的基准，用于评估学生表现和学校的问责制。然而，标准化测试的批评者认为，这可能导致对死记硬背的狭隘关注，而不是培养批判性思维和创造力。例如，许多教师感到压力，必须以考试为中心教学，优先考虑测试准备而非更深入的学习体验。这种现象可能抑制教学方法的创新，减少课程的丰富性，因为教育者可能感到被迫覆盖特定的测试内容，而不是更深入地探索主题。此外，标准化评估往往未能考虑学生的多样化背景和学习风格。儿童来自不同的社会经济、文化和语言背景，这可能会显著影响他们在标准化测试中的表现。批评者认为，过度依赖这些评估可能会加剧教育系统中的不平等，因为来自弱势背景的学生可能无法获得与同龄人相同的资源和支持。此外，人们越来越担心对标准化测试的强调可能导致有害的教学环境。当教育工作者主要因学生的考试成绩而被追究责任时，他们可能会感到被迫走捷径或参与不道德的行为，例如教授应试策略，而不是有意义的内容。这种情况可能在教师和学生之间创造出恐惧和压力的文化，削弱整体教育体验。尽管有这些批评，但必须认识到，当适当地使用时，标准化评估可以发挥有价值的作用。它们可以为识别学生可能需要额外支持的领域提供有用的数据，并帮助学校跟踪进展。当与其他形式的评估（例如基于项目的学习和形成性评估）结合使用时，标准化测试可以为学生学习的更全面理解做出贡献。总之，围绕标准化教育的辩论是复杂而多面的。虽然标准化测试可以提供有关学生表现的见解并帮助保持问责制，但它们也有可能缩小教育的关注范围，加剧现有的不平等。随着我们向前发展，教育工作者和政策制定者必须在保持高标准与促进包容性、参与性和整体学习环境之间取得平衡。通过这样做，我们可以确保教育仍然是赋权的工具，而不是分裂的源头。