joinder

简明释义

[ˈdʒɔɪndə(r)][ˈdʒɔɪndər]

n. 联合诉讼,共同诉讼;连接

英英释义

The act of joining or combining two or more parties or claims in a legal proceeding.

在法律程序中将两个或多个当事方或索赔结合在一起的行为。

A legal term used to describe the inclusion of additional parties in a lawsuit.

一个法律术语,用于描述在诉讼中加入额外当事方的情况。

单词用法

joinder of parties

当事方的加入

joinder of claims

索赔的加入

necessary joinder

必要的加入

permissive joinder

许可的加入

同义词

joining

连接

The joining of two parties in a contract is essential for its validity.

两个当事人在合同中的连接对其有效性至关重要。

addition

添加

The addition of new evidence can strengthen a case significantly.

新证据的添加可以显著增强案件的力度。

conjunction

结合

In legal terms, the conjunction of claims may lead to a more comprehensive judgment.

在法律术语中,索赔的结合可能会导致更全面的判决。

combination

组合

The combination of resources from both companies resulted in a successful merger.

两家公司资源的组合导致了一次成功的合并。

反义词

severance

分离

The court granted a severance of the cases due to lack of evidence.

法院因缺乏证据而批准了案件的分离。

disjoin

分开

The parties decided to disjoin their claims into separate lawsuits.

各方决定将其索赔分开为单独的诉讼。

例句

1.The alternative joinder that plaintiff puts forward two kinds of cause of action concerning contract and tort is extensively excluded, however, substantive law cannot provide basis for it.

在同一程序中就同一纠纷同时提起侵权之诉和合同之诉的起诉方式(重叠合并)广受排斥,然而实体法并不能为此提供依据。

2.The bases of joinder of punishments for plural crimes include the requests of punishments purpose, criminal law, existence of abolished interests and maximum of executing punishment.

刑罚目的的要求、刑法规定的要求、剥夺利益存在的要求和刑罚方法极限的要求是确定数罪并罚规则的根据。

3.The alternative joinder that plaintiff puts forward two kinds of cause of action concerning contract and tort is extensively excluded, however, substantive law cannot provide basis for it.

在同一程序中就同一纠纷同时提起侵权之诉和合同之诉的起诉方式(重叠合并)广受排斥,然而实体法并不能为此提供依据。

4.The imaginative joinder of offenses is an important appearance of the theory of the number of offenses.

想象竞合犯是罪数理论中的一个重要形态。

5.Although imaginative joinder of offenses is not expressly described by our current criminal law, this kind of crime pattern is admitted in theory.

想象竞合犯是非数罪形态之一,虽然我国现行刑法中并没有想象竞合犯的明文规定,但理论上普遍承认这种犯罪形态。

6.Some articles in the drafts of Tort Liability Law reject alternative joinder, which was self-contradictory as well.

有侵权行为法建议稿中的责任竞合条文虽排斥这种起诉方式,但它们是自相矛盾的。

7.Joinder of preliminary action is a litigation system to solve the problem of combination of rights of claims, enhancing the litigation of efficiency, saving judicial resources.

预备合并之诉,正是为解决请求权竞合难题、提高诉讼效率、节约司法资源而构建的一种诉讼制度。

8.The deep - seated reason of excluding alternative joinder is confusing substantive law with procedural law.

排斥重叠合并的深层原因是实体法与程序法的混同。

9.The essence of the imaginative joinder offenses is one crime.

想象竞合犯的本质是实质的一罪。

10.The court allowed the joinder 合并 of multiple defendants in a single lawsuit.

法院允许在单一诉讼中对多个被告进行joinder 合并

11.In class action lawsuits, joinder 合并 of many individuals is necessary.

在集体诉讼中,许多个人的joinder 合并是必要的。

12.The attorney filed a motion for joinder 合并 to include additional parties in the case.

律师提交了一项动议,要求进行joinder 合并以包括案件中的其他当事人。

13.The judge ruled that the joinder 合并 of claims was appropriate under the circumstances.

法官裁定在这种情况下进行索赔的joinder 合并是适当的。

14.A joinder 合并 of claims can simplify the legal process.

索赔的joinder 合并可以简化法律程序。

作文

In the realm of law, the term joinder refers to the joining of two or more legal issues, parties, or claims within a single lawsuit. This concept is crucial because it allows for the efficient resolution of related matters in one judicial proceeding rather than multiple, separate ones. For instance, when individuals are involved in the same incident that leads to different claims, joinder enables them to consolidate their cases. This not only saves time but also reduces the burden on the court system. Understanding joinder is essential for both legal professionals and individuals navigating the legal landscape. It can significantly impact the strategy employed in litigation. When parties decide to pursue joinder, they must consider various factors, such as whether the claims arise from the same transaction or occurrence and whether they share common questions of law or fact. If these conditions are met, courts generally favor joinder to promote judicial efficiency and avoid inconsistent verdicts. There are different types of joinder, including necessary and permissive joinder. Necessary joinder occurs when a party must be included in a lawsuit for it to proceed effectively. For example, if a contract dispute involves multiple parties who are jointly liable, all parties must be joined to ensure a fair resolution. On the other hand, permissive joinder allows parties to join a lawsuit at their discretion, provided their claims share a common issue. This flexibility can lead to more comprehensive resolutions, as interconnected issues are addressed simultaneously. The significance of joinder extends beyond mere procedural efficiency. It also reflects the principles of fairness and justice in the legal system. By allowing related claims to be heard together, joinder helps prevent situations where different courts might reach conflicting conclusions about similar facts or legal questions. This coherence is vital for upholding the integrity of the judicial process. Moreover, joinder can influence the outcomes of lawsuits. The presence of multiple parties may alter the dynamics of a case, affecting how evidence is presented and how arguments are framed. Legal representatives often strategize around joinder to strengthen their positions, knowing that the interplay of various claims can sway a judge or jury's perception. In conclusion, the concept of joinder is a fundamental aspect of legal proceedings that serves to streamline the judicial process and promote equitable outcomes. By allowing for the combination of related claims and parties, joinder enhances the efficiency of the legal system while ensuring that justice is served. Understanding this term is crucial for anyone involved in legal matters, as it underscores the importance of considering how interconnected issues can be effectively addressed within a single framework. As such, joinder stands as a testament to the principles of collaboration and unity within the often complex world of law.

在法律领域中,术语joinder指的是在单一诉讼中将两个或多个法律问题、当事人或索赔结合在一起。这个概念至关重要,因为它允许在一个司法程序中高效解决相关事项,而不是多个分开的程序。例如,当个人涉及同一事件并导致不同的索赔时,joinder使他们能够合并案件。这不仅节省了时间,还减少了法院系统的负担。理解joinder对法律专业人士和在法律环境中导航的个人至关重要。它可以显著影响诉讼中采用的策略。当各方决定追求joinder时,他们必须考虑各种因素,例如索赔是否源于相同的交易或事件,以及它们是否共享法律或事实的共同问题。如果满足这些条件,法院通常支持joinder以促进司法效率并避免不一致的裁决。joinderjoinder。必要的joinder发生在某一方必须被包含在诉讼中才能有效进行的情况下。例如,如果合同争议涉及多个共同负责的当事人,则所有当事人必须被联合,以确保公平解决。另一方面,许可的joinder允许当事人在其自由裁量权下加入诉讼,前提是其索赔共享一个共同的问题。这种灵活性可以导致更全面的解决方案,因为相互关联的问题同时得到解决。joinder的重要性不仅仅体现在程序效率上。它还反映了法律系统中的公平与正义原则。通过允许相关索赔一起审理,joinder有助于防止不同法院可能对类似事实或法律问题得出相互矛盾的结论。这种一致性对于维护司法过程的完整性至关重要。此外,joinder还可以影响诉讼的结果。多个当事人的存在可能会改变案件的动态,影响证据的呈现方式和论点的构建。法律代表通常围绕joinder进行战略布局,知道各种索赔之间的相互作用可能会影响法官或陪审团的看法。总之,joinder这一概念是法律程序的基本方面,旨在简化司法过程并促进公正的结果。通过允许相关索赔和当事人结合在一起,joinder增强了法律系统的效率,同时确保实现正义。理解这个术语对任何涉及法律事务的人来说至关重要,因为它强调了考虑如何在单一框架内有效解决相互关联的问题的重要性。因此,joinder作为法律世界中合作与团结原则的见证,彰显了其重要性。