double scale

简明释义

双标度

英英释义

例句

1.Using a double scale 双重比例 can help you visualize the project in both its full size and miniature form.

使用double scale 双重比例可以帮助你同时可视化项目的全尺寸和微型形式。

2.When creating the model, we had to reference the double scale 双重比例 to get the proportions right.

在制作模型时，我们必须参考double scale 双重比例以获得正确的比例。

3.The architect designed the building using a double scale 双重比例 to ensure accuracy in both large and small details.

建筑师使用了一个double scale 双重比例来确保大细节和小细节的准确性。

4.In cartography, a double scale 双重比例 allows users to understand distances on different levels of the map.

在制图中，double scale 双重比例允许用户理解地图上不同级别的距离。

5.The engineer explained how the double scale 双重比例 was crucial for the structural analysis.

工程师解释了double scale 双重比例对结构分析的重要性。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of a double scale is becoming increasingly relevant. A double scale refers to a situation where two different sets of criteria or measurements are applied to the same issue or problem, often leading to inconsistencies and confusion. This phenomenon can be observed in various fields, including education, economics, and even social justice.For instance, in the field of education, students may face a double scale when their performance is evaluated based on different standards. Consider a scenario where a school uses one grading system for its local students and another for international students. This discrepancy can create feelings of unfairness among students and may hinder their academic progress. It raises questions about the validity of the assessments and whether all students are being given an equal opportunity to succeed.Similarly, in economics, we often see a double scale when comparing the living standards of different countries. For example, a country may be classified as 'developed' based on certain economic indicators while simultaneously facing issues such as poverty and inequality. This selective application of criteria can obscure the true picture of a nation's prosperity and lead to misguided policies that fail to address the root causes of these problems.Moreover, the concept of a double scale is particularly significant in discussions surrounding social justice. Different communities may be subjected to varying levels of scrutiny and accountability, depending on their socioeconomic status or cultural background. For example, when discussing crime rates, a double scale may emerge if one community is labeled as 'dangerous' while another, with similar crime statistics, is viewed as 'troubled.' This inconsistency can perpetuate stereotypes and reinforce systemic inequalities.To address the challenges posed by a double scale, it is essential to promote transparency and consistency in our evaluations and judgments. We must strive to establish universal standards that apply equally to all individuals and groups. This requires not only awareness of the biases that inform our assessments but also a commitment to fairness and equity.In conclusion, the notion of a double scale serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in our evaluations of people, societies, and nations. By recognizing and addressing these discrepancies, we can work towards a more just and equitable world. It is crucial that we advocate for consistent standards and challenge the biases that perpetuate inequality. Only then can we ensure that everyone is judged by the same criteria and afforded the same opportunities for success, regardless of their background or circumstances.

在当今快速变化的世界中，‘双重标准’的概念变得越来越相关。‘双重标准’指的是对同一问题或困境应用两套不同的标准或测量标准的情况，这往往会导致不一致和混乱。这种现象可以在教育、经济甚至社会正义等多个领域观察到。例如，在教育领域，当学生的表现基于不同的标准进行评估时，他们可能面临‘双重标准’。考虑这样一个场景：一所学校对本地学生使用一种评分系统，而对国际学生使用另一种。这种差异可能会在学生中产生不公平感，并可能阻碍他们的学业进步。这引发了关于评估有效性的问题，以及所有学生是否都获得了平等成功机会的疑问。同样，在经济学中，我们常常看到在比较不同国家的生活标准时出现‘双重标准’。例如，一个国家可能根据某些经济指标被归类为“发达”，同时却面临贫困和不平等的问题。这种选择性标准的应用可能会掩盖一个国家繁荣的真实情况，并导致未能解决这些问题根源的误导性政策。此外，在社会正义的讨论中，‘双重标准’的概念尤为重要。不同社区可能受到不同程度的审查和问责，具体取决于其社会经济地位或文化背景。例如，在讨论犯罪率时，如果一个社区被标记为“危险”，而另一个具有类似犯罪统计的社区被视为“麻烦”，那么就可能出现‘双重标准’。这种不一致性可能会延续刻板印象并加强系统性不平等。为了应对‘双重标准’所带来的挑战，促进评估和判断的透明度和一致性至关重要。我们必须努力建立适用于所有个人和群体的普遍标准。这不仅需要意识到影响我们评估的偏见，还需要对公平和公正的承诺。总之，‘双重标准’的概念提醒我们在评估人、社会和国家时固有的复杂性。通过认识和解决这些差异，我们可以朝着一个更加公正和公平的世界努力。倡导一致的标准并挑战维持不平等的偏见至关重要。只有这样，我们才能确保每个人都按照相同的标准被评判，并获得相同的成功机会，无论他们的背景或处境如何。