contraband of war

简明释义

战时禁运品

英英释义

Contraband of war refers to goods that are prohibited from being supplied to an enemy during a conflict, typically because they could be used to support military operations.

战争违禁品是指在冲突期间禁止向敌方供应的物品,通常因为这些物品可能被用于支持军事行动。

例句

1.During the conflict, the navy intercepted a ship carrying contraband of war.

在冲突期间,海军拦截了一艘载有战争禁品的船只。

2.The government imposed strict penalties for those found trafficking in contraband of war.

政府对那些被发现贩卖战争禁品的人施加了严格的惩罚。

3.Intelligence reports indicated that the rebels were using contraband of war to gain an advantage.

情报报告显示叛军正在利用战争禁品来获得优势。

4.The court ruled that the seizure of contraband of war was lawful under international law.

法院裁定,根据国际法,查获战争禁品是合法的。

5.Customs officials are trained to identify contraband of war at border checkpoints.

海关官员接受培训,以识别边境检查点的战争禁品

作文

The term contraband of war refers to goods that are prohibited from being supplied to a belligerent during times of conflict. These goods can include weapons, ammunition, and other military supplies that could enhance the capabilities of one side in a war. The concept of contraband of war has historical roots in international law, particularly in the context of naval warfare, where blockades were often used to restrict an enemy's access to vital resources. Understanding this term is essential for comprehending the broader implications of warfare and the legal frameworks that govern it.Throughout history, the classification of certain goods as contraband of war has been a contentious issue. For instance, during World War I and World War II, various nations implemented strict regulations to prevent the shipment of contraband to their adversaries. This not only included traditional military supplies but also items such as food and medical supplies, which could indirectly support military efforts. The rationale behind this practice is that any resource that could potentially aid an enemy in sustaining their war effort should be restricted.In modern conflicts, the definition of contraband of war has evolved. The rise of asymmetric warfare, where non-state actors engage in combat against established military forces, has blurred the lines of what constitutes contraband. For example, in conflicts involving terrorist organizations, even seemingly benign goods can be classified as contraband if they are believed to support hostile activities. This has led to complex legal and ethical dilemmas regarding the shipment of humanitarian aid to regions affected by war.The enforcement of contraband of war regulations often falls to naval forces, which may intercept ships suspected of carrying prohibited goods. However, this raises questions about the legality of such actions under international law. Critics argue that the enforcement of these regulations can lead to violations of neutral rights, especially when innocent vessels are caught up in the crossfire of geopolitical tensions. As a result, the concept of contraband of war is not only a legal matter but also a moral one, as it involves balancing the needs of war with humanitarian considerations.Moreover, the implications of classifying goods as contraband of war extend beyond the battlefield. Economically, such classifications can cripple nations that rely on trade, leading to broader repercussions for global markets. Countries that are subjected to blockades or sanctions often face severe shortages of essential goods, impacting civilian populations far removed from the conflict itself. This raises significant ethical questions about the impact of war on non-combatants and the responsibilities of nations to protect human rights even amidst conflict.In conclusion, the term contraband of war encompasses a wide range of issues that intersect law, ethics, and economics. It reflects the complexities of modern warfare and the ongoing debates surrounding the regulation of goods during conflicts. Understanding this term is crucial for anyone studying international relations, military history, or humanitarian law. As we continue to navigate the challenges of contemporary warfare, the implications of contraband of war will remain a vital area of discussion and analysis.

“战争违禁品”一词指的是在冲突期间禁止向交战方提供的货物。这些货物可以包括武器、弹药以及其他可能增强一方战争能力的军事补给。“战争违禁品”的概念在国际法中有着历史渊源,特别是在海上战争的背景下,封锁常常用于限制敌方获取重要资源。理解这个术语对于理解战争的更广泛影响及其法律框架至关重要。纵观历史,将某些货物归类为“战争违禁品”一直是一个有争议的问题。例如,在第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战期间,各国实施了严格的规定,以防止违禁品运送到敌方。这不仅包括传统的军事补给,还包括食品和医疗用品等,间接支持军事行动。这一做法背后的理由是,任何可能帮助敌方维持战争努力的资源都应受到限制。在现代冲突中,“战争违禁品”的定义已经演变。非对称战争的兴起,即非国家行为者与建立的军事力量进行作战,模糊了违禁品的界限。例如,在涉及恐怖组织的冲突中,即使是看似无害的货物,如果被认为支持敌对活动,也可能被归类为违禁品。这导致了关于向战争受影响地区运输人道主义援助的复杂法律和伦理困境。“战争违禁品”法规的执行通常由海军力量负责,它们可能会拦截怀疑携带违禁货物的船只。然而,这引发了关于根据国际法此类行动合法性的质疑。批评者认为,执行这些规定可能导致中立权利的侵犯,尤其是在无辜船只卷入地缘政治紧张局势时。因此,“战争违禁品”的概念不仅是法律问题,也是道德问题,因为它涉及在战争中平衡战争需求与人道考虑。此外,将货物归类为“战争违禁品”的影响超出了战场。经济上,这种分类可能会削弱依赖贸易的国家,导致对全球市场产生更广泛的影响。受到封锁或制裁的国家往往面临基本商品的严重短缺,对远离冲突的平民人口造成影响。这引发了关于战争对非战斗人员影响的重要伦理问题,以及各国在冲突中保护人权的责任。总之,“战争违禁品”这一术语涵盖了法律、伦理和经济交汇的广泛问题。它反映了现代战争的复杂性以及围绕冲突期间货物管制的持续辩论。理解这个术语对任何研究国际关系、军事历史或人道法的人来说都是至关重要的。随着我们继续应对当代战争的挑战,“战争违禁品”的影响将始终是讨论和分析的重要领域。

相关单词

war

war详解:怎么读、什么意思、用法